Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1-mutated cancers are sensitive to the green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 5,
  • 1 and
  • 2Email author
Contributed equally
Cancer & Metabolism20197:4

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40170-019-0198-7

  • Received: 1 November 2018
  • Accepted: 9 April 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) occur in various types of cancer and induce metabolic alterations resulting from the neomorphic activity that causes production of D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG) at the expense of α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) and NADPH. To overcome metabolic stress induced by these alterations, IDH-mutated (IDHmut) cancers utilize rescue mechanisms comprising pathways in which glutaminase and glutamate dehydrogenase (GLUD) are involved. We hypothesized that inhibition of glutamate processing with the pleiotropic GLUD-inhibitor epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) would not only hamper D-2-HG production, but also decrease NAD(P)H and α-KG synthesis in IDHmut cancers, resulting in increased metabolic stress and increased sensitivity to radiotherapy.

Methods

We performed 13C-tracing studies to show that HCT116 colorectal cancer cells with an IDH1R132H knock-in allele depend more on glutaminolysis than on glycolysis for the production of D-2-HG. We treated HCT116 cells, HCT116-IDH1R132H cells, and HT1080 cells (carrying an IDH1R132C mutation) with EGCG and evaluated D-2-HG production, cell proliferation rates, and sensitivity to radiotherapy.

Results

Significant amounts of 13C from glutamate accumulate in D-2-HG in HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H but not in HCT116-IDH1wt/wt. Preventing glutamate processing in HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells with EGCG resulted in reduction of D-2-HG production. In addition, EGCG treatment decreased proliferation rates of IDH1mut cells and at high doses sensitized cancer cells to ionizing radiation. Effects of EGCG in IDH-mutated cell lines were diminished by treatment with the IDH1mut inhibitor AGI-5198.

Conclusions

This work shows that glutamate can be directly processed into D-2-HG and that reduction of glutamatolysis may be an effective and promising new treatment option for IDHmut cancers.

Keywords

  • IDH mutations
  • Metabolism
  • EGCG
  • Radiotherapy
  • Glutamate

Background

Acquisition of hotspot mutations in IDH1 and IDH2 are key events in the development of various types of cancer. The mutations are found in 80–90% of gliomas [13], in substantial percentages of acute myeloid leukemia [4], chondrosarcoma [5], osteosarcoma [6], and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [7], and are sporadically found in other cancer types [8, 9].

IDH1 and IDH2 are NADP+-dependent homodimeric enzymes that oxidize isocitrate (ICT) to α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) in cytosol and mitochondria, respectively [10]. The NADPH produced by these reactions contributes to the reductive potential of the cell [11]. Cancer-related mutations in IDH1 and IDH2 are mostly heterozygous and are always hotspot mutations involving arginine residues R132 in IDH1 and R140 or R172 in IDH2. The mutated subunits have acquired a neomorphic activity of reducing α-KG to D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG) while oxidizing NAPDH [12, 13]. Accumulation of D-2-HG competitively inhibits α-KG-dependent enzymes, including the ten-eleven translocation (TET) family of methylcytosine dioxygenases, resulting in a CpG island hypermethylator phenotype that is considered as a first step in malignant transformation [14, 15]. Whereas IDH mutations are involved in the initial steps of carcinogenesis, the metabolic and oxidative stress that comes with the mutation may eventually slow down tumor progression, explaining the better survival of patients carrying IDHmut gliomas [16, 17]. IDH mutations are however not associated with prolonged survival in non-glioma cancer patients, indicating tissue-specific effects that are currently not understood [1, 3, 18].

Small molecule inhibitors of mutant IDH1 and IDH2 enzymes have been developed to prevent the production of the alleged oncometabolite D-2-HG [19, 20]. However, blocking D-2-HG production also blocks NADPH oxidation and consequently decreases oxidative stress, desensitizing IDHmut cells for radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and inhibitors of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP), an important enzyme involved in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair [2124].

To improve the clinical outcomes of patients with IDHmut cancers, it is essential to increase, rather than decrease, metabolic stress. We previously showed that clinical IDHmut gliomas have dramatically altered expression profiles of genes involved in metabolism as compared to IDHwt gliomas. Based on these data, we proposed a model in which IDHmut gliomas utilize the neurotransmitter glutamate and lactate as fuels [25], whereas IDHwt gliomas predominantly use glucose [26]. According to that model, the shortage of α-KG in IDHmut gliomas is partially rescued by direct import of glutamate that is converted to α-KG by the NAD+-/NADP+-dependent enzymes glutamate dehydrogenase 1/2 (GLUD1/2). In IDHmut non-gliomas, residing in environments with low glutamate concentrations, this rescue pathway may start with the import of glutamine that is first converted to glutamate by mitochondrial glutaminase (GLS), followed by GLUD1/2-mediated further processing to α-KG. Multiple studies have shown that glutamine is a major carbon donor for D-2-HG [2729]. Alpha-KG can then be shuttled into the TCA cycle or converted to D-2-HG. We therefore hypothesized that inhibition of glutamate processing in IDHmut cancer cells would not only prevent D-2-HG production, but also NAD(P) H and α-KG synthesis, thus increasing metabolic stress and sensitizing IDHmut cancers to radiotherapy and chemotherapy [25, 30].

To test how different nutrients contribute to D-2-HG production in non-glioma tumors, we here employed HCT116 and HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H knock-in colorectal cancer cells and HT1080 cells, a fibrosarcoma cell line containing an endogenous IDH1R132C mutation. We performed carbon tracing studies and investigated the effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), an inhibitor of GLUD1/2 and of NADP-dependent enzymes, on D-2-HG synthesis and radiosensitivity of these cell lines.

Methods

Cell lines and compounds

HCT116-IH1wt/wt (parental) and HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H knock-in human colorectal cell lines were generated by AAV targeting technology GENESIS [31] and obtained from Horizon Discovery (Cambridge, UK). HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells (containing an endogenous IDH1wt/R132C mutation) were a kind gift of Dr. W. Hendriks (Dept. of Cell Biology, Radboudumc). Cell lines were cultured in DMEM (LONZA, Basel, Switzerland) supplemented with 10% FCS (Gibco, Waltham, MA) and 40 μg/μl gentamycin (Centrafarm, Etten-Leur, the Netherlands). Cell lines were checked for IDH1R132H expression by Western blotting of cytosolic protein extracts, using a mutation-specific antibody (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany; DIAH09). All experiments in this study were performed with cells below passage number 25 as IDH1R132H expression levels gradually dropped at higher passage numbers (data not shown). All chemicals were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) unless stated otherwise. EGCG (E4268) was stored in DMSO at a concentration of 25 mM under nitrogen gas and kept from light, or dissolved in distilled water directly before use. The IDH1mut inhibitor AGI-5198 was from MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, NJ).

13C-isotope tracing experiments

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and LC-MS experiments were performed to investigate the contribution of glutamine (Gln), glutamate (Glu), and glucose (Glc) as carbon donors for D-2-HG (see Fig. 1a). For NMR, HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H and HCT116 cells were grown to 50% confluency in T175 culture flasks (Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria) and incubated with glutamine-free DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FCS and 4 mM [1-13C]-glutamine or 4 mM [1-13C]-glutamate. EGCG (100 μM final concentration in distilled H2O) or solvent control was administered 2 h prior to the start of incubation. After 20 h of incubation, cells were placed on ice, washed twice with ice-cold PBS, and lysed in 2.5 ml methanol (MeOH) (− 20 °C) containing 280 mM formic acid as a 1H and 13C (naturally abundant) NMR reference compound. After 10 min, cell material was collected with a rubber policeman, thoroughly vortexed and centrifuged for 5 min at 1200×g to precipitate proteins. The protein content of the precipitated pellets was measured using a Pierce BCA protein assay kit (ThermoScientific, Rockford, IL) and used for data normalization. The metabolites in the supernatant were dried in a SpeedVac evaporator (Savant, Waltham, MA) and redissolved in 400 μl D2O for NMR analysis (Avance III 500 MHz, Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Carbon sources for D-2-HG production and 13C tracing studies. a Schematic model of metabolic pathways involved in the production of D-2-HG from extracellular glucose, glutamine, and glutamate; the 13C labeling patterns following incubation in culture medium containing 13C-labeled glucose (light circles) and glutamine or glutamate (dark circles). b Example of 13C NMR spectra of extracts of HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H and HCT116 cells cultured in medium with [1-13C]-glutamine (Gln*, blue) or [1-13C]-glutamate (Glu*, red). [1-13C]-D-2-HG (D-2-HG*) was detected at 181.8 ppm and could not be observed in parental HCT116 cells. c Quantified NMR results showing levels of Glu*, Gln*, and D-2-HG* in HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells, after incubation in medium with Gln* (blue) or Glu* (red). d LC-MS analysis of D-2-HG pool fractional enrichments in HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells after incubation with 13C-labeled substrates. Bar I displays the total amount of D-2-HG and the fractions that were derived from Gln* (blue) and Glc* (gray). Results were obtained from two separate measurements: in the first measurement cells were incubated in DMEM with Glc and Gln*; in the second measurement DMEM was supplemented with Glc* and Gln*. The difference in labeled fractions from these two measurements was assigned as the Glc* fraction. In a parallel experiment Gln and Gln* were substituted by Glu and Glu* respectively. Bar II shows the total amount of D-2-HG and the fractions that were derived from Glu* (red) and Glc* (gray). A third experiment was performed with DMEM containing Glu*, Gln, and Glc. Bar III displays the total amount of D-2-HG and the fraction that was derived from Glu* (red). Provided that both Glu and Gln are available from the culture medium, production of Glu-derived D-2-HG (red) was substantial. Gln* and Glc* fractions were not measured in experiment III. Supplemented metabolite concentrations were always the same: 5.5 mM glucose and 4 mM glutamine and/or 4 mM glutamate

NMR spectra were acquired with pulse-acquire experiments. For 1H NMR, the settings were TR = 18 s, 90° flip angle, NS = 16; and for 13C, TR = 5.1 s, 30° flip angle, NS = 7000, and proton-decoupling. The spectra were analyzed with Bruker Topspin software. Integrated peak intensities of D-2-HG, Glu, and Gln were corrected for T1 saturation, number of contributing spins, and cell number and were referenced to formic acid to obtain concentrations.

Because total amounts of D-2-HG are difficult to obtain from 1H spectra, due to overlapping resonances of D-2-HG and glutamate, total and 13C-labeled D-2-HG pools were examined with LC-MS. To this end, HCT116 and HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells were grown to 50% confluency in 10 cm culture dishes (Greiner Bio-One) and incubated with Glc- and Gln-free DMEM with and without 10% FCS and different combinations of non-labeled and 13C-labeled Glc, Gln, or Glu. In all experiments, the final total Glc concentration was 5.5 mM and Glu and/or Gln concentrations were 4 mM. LC-MS was performed as described before [32].

Proliferation assays

Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 500 cells/well (HCT116 cell lines) or 1000 cells/well (HT1080) and left to adhere overnight. The following day varying concentrations of EGCG or vehicle were added. For AGI-5198 experiments, cells were cultured at least 3 days in the presence of 5 μM AGI-5198, and the compound was left on the cells during the entire experiment [21]. At days 2, 4, and 6 after seeding, total cell protein content was measured using SRB assays, as described [33]. In short, cells were washed twice with PBS and fixated overnight at 4 °C in 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid. After fixation, plates were washed four times with distilled H2O and stored at − 20 °C until analysis. Plates were stained with 0.5% (w/v) SRB dissolved in 1% (v/v) acetic acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated in the dark for 20 min. After washing four times with 1% acetic acid, plates were dried at 60 °C. Protein-bound SRB was solubilized with 150 μl 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 10. Optical densities were measured at 560 nm on a microplate reader (Bio-rad, Hercules, CA). Proliferation is expressed as fold increase, normalized for the protein content of control cells 1 day after plating.

Alternatively, cell proliferation was measured using the xCELLigence Real-Time Cell Analyzer system (ACEA Biosciences, San Diego, CA). Cells were plated in duplicate at a density of 1000 cells/well on ACEA E16 view plates. The next day, EGCG or vehicle was added to the wells. Doubling times were calculated over 48 h, using dedicated ACEA software.

GLUD1/2 and IDH enzymatic assays

IDH1 was expressed as glutathione S-transferase (GST)-fusion protein in pDEST15 and purified on glutathione beads (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) as described [34]. Purified bovine GLUD1/2 was purchased from Serva (Heidelberg, Germany). Enzyme reactions were initiated by adding 4 μg IDH1 enzyme to a mixture of 100 μM NADP+, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM isocitrate, and 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4). GLUD1/2 activity was measured in reactions containing 0.1 U bovine GLUD1/2 enzyme, 500 μM NAD+, 10 mM glutamate, and 2 mM ADP in phosphate buffer (pH 8.0). Stoichiometric production of NADPH and NADH was measured by real-time monitoring of NADPH or NADH absorbance at 340 nm with 20 s intervals on an Omega Fluostar (BMG Labtech, Ortneberg, Germany).

Colony-forming assays after ionizing radiation (IR)

Cells, cultured with or without AGI-5198, were seeded in 6-well plates (30–5000 cells/well) and left to adhere overnight. Cells were treated with 0, 20, 50, or 100 μM EGCG for 24 h and irradiated with 0, 2, or 4 Gy (IR, 3.1 Gy/min; XRAD 320 ix; Precision XRT; N. Brandford, CT, USA). After 72 h, the medium was refreshed and cells were cultured for another 7 days (without EGCG) and fixated with 70% ethanol (10 min, 4 °C). After drying at 60 °C, colonies were stained with 0.5% (w/v) crystal violet (Merck) in distilled water. Colonies consisting of 50 cells or more were considered to be derived from cells surviving radiotherapy and were manually counted. The effect of EGCG on radiotherapy-induced cell death was expressed as surviving fraction, normalized to plating efficiency.

DNA-double strand break (DSB) detection

Cells (cultured with or without AGI-5198) were plated at a density of 300,000 cells/well in 6-well plates and left to adhere overnight. After 24 h incubation with EGCG (0, 50, or 100 μM), cells were irradiated with 0, 2, or 4 Gy. After 30 min, cytosolic extracts were prepared in 1× RIPA buffer (Cell Signaling Technologies) containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). Cell extracts were sonicated to release nuclear proteins. Protein samples (25 μg) were electrophoresed on 10% SDS-PAGE gels and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose (GE Healthcare). Blots were stained with anti-γH2AX antibody (Ser139; #2577; Cell Signaling Technologies) and anti-γ-tubulin (C20) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, sc-7396), followed by appropriate secondary antibodies labeled with IRDye680 or IRDye800 (ThermoFisher). Signals were visualized and quantified using the Odyssey system (Li-COR, Lincoln, NE).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism v5.03 (GraphPad Software, LaJolla, CA). The difference in mean values between various groups was assessed using an unpaired Student’s t test, unless mentioned otherwise. P values are marked as follows: < 0.05 (*); < 0.01 (**); < 0.001 (***), < 0.0001 (****). Differences were considered statistically significant when P values were < 0.05.

Results

Glutamine and glutamate are carbon donors for D-2-HG production

To find support for the hypothesis that glutaminolysis and/or glutamatolysis is a rescue mechanism for IDHmut cancers, we used the HCT116 cell line and its isogenic knock-in variant HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H. The balanced expression of both alleles makes this variant more representative for clinical cancers than overexpression models [35]. We used [1-13C]-labeled glutamine (Gln*) and glutamate (Glu*) at similar concentrations to trace the routing of carbons from Gln and Glu to D-2-HG. Labeled carbon from Glu or Gln that enters the TCA cycle is lost as carbon dioxide by oxidative decarboxylation of α-KG (see Fig. 1a).

13C-NMR spectra of extracts of IDH1mut cells, cultured for 20 h in Gln*-containing DMEM, showed 13C resonances for Glu and D-2-HG, demonstrating significant carbon fluxes from Gln to Glu and to D-2-HG (see blue graph in upper panel of Fig. 1b for a representative NMR spectrum). In similar experiments with Glu* instead of Gln* in the medium, we observed 13C resonances for Gln and D-2-HG, next to that for Glu, demonstrating carbon flux from Glu to Gln and to D-2-HG (see red spectrum in the upper panel of Fig. 1b, c). Whereas cells take up less Glu* than Gln*, the ratio D-2-HG*/Glu* (0.36, n = 2) was higher than that of D-2-HG*/Gln* in the Gln* incubation experiments (0.08, n = 6; see Fig. 1c). Since D-2-HG was not detected in parental HCT116 cells (see lower panel of Fig. 1b), these cells were not used for further 13C experiments.

Relative contributions of Glu, Gln, and Glc carbons to the total pool of D-2-HG were assessed with LC-MS of extracts of cells, cultured 20 h in medium with Glu* or Gln*, together with Glc* ([1,6-13C2]-glucose). Experiments with Gln* + Glc* in the medium revealed that 64 ± 8.5% of D-2-HG was derived from Gln* whereas 22 ± 3.8% was derived from Glc* (n = 5; see Fig. 1d, medium formulation I). When cells were cultured in Glu* + Glc*-containing DMEM in the absence of Gln, the total amount of D-2-HG decreased, with 53 ± 3.1% of carbons originating from Glu* and 31 ± 1.8% from Glc* (n = 3; Fig. 1d, formulation II). Only small amounts of non-labeled D-2-HG were detected when cells were cultured in medium formulations I and II. When cultured in DMEM with Glu* and non-labeled Gln and Glc, the total amount of D-2-HG was highest (Fig. 1d, formulation III). Of all intracellular D-2-HG, 41 ± 0.2% was derived from Glu* (n = 3). The latter experiment showed that direct glutamate contribution is substantial even in the presence of glutamine and that the availability of Gln is a prerequisite for increased D-2-HG production.

EGCG inhibits proliferation of IDH mut cells more effectively than proliferation of IDH wt cells

Our finding that the glutamine-glutamate pathway is an important carbon donor for D-2-HG via α-KG suggests that blocking this pathway not only decreases α-KG availability and D-2-HG production, but also increases oxidative stress [21]. In line with this hypothesis, inhibiting GLUD1/2 by EGCG dose-dependently reduced growth rates of HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells more than of parental HCT116 cells (Fig. 2a). Because the IDH1mut inhibitor AGI-5198 prevents D-2-HG production and NADPH oxidation [21], it is expected to annihilate the metabolic stress that is caused by the IDH mutation, thereby reducing the effects of EGCG. Indeed, AGI-5198 treatment antagonized the inhibitory effect of EGCG to the level that was observed for parental HCT116 cells (Fig. 2b). This finding was supported in experiments with HT1080 cells, in which AGI-5198 treatment resulted in significantly increased proliferation rates, while decreasing sensitivity to EGCG (Fig. 2c).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Proliferation assays of the isogenic cell line pair HCT116 and HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H with EGCG. a Doubling times of cells as measured on the xCELLigence. Doubling times for HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H (red bars) were significantly higher compared to its wild-type counterpart (blue bars). Supplementation of EGCG to the culture medium increased doubling times in both cell lines, but this effect was more significant in HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H. b SRB assay of HCT116 cells cultured with EGCG (dotted lines) or vehicle (solid lines). HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H (red lines) cells had slower proliferation rates as compared to HCT116 (blue lines). Addition of AGI-5198 (gray lines) rescued the proliferation rates of IDH1R132H cells to HCT116 baseline levels. EGCG inhibited proliferation of HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H more than HCT116, and this inhibitory effect was abolished by AGI-5198. Similar results were obtained for HT10180 cells (c)

EGCG inhibits GLUD1/2 and IDH1 activity

EGCG is an inhibitor of GLUD but also of other NADP+-dependent enzymes [36], which could contribute to the reduction in growth rates of HCT116 and HT1080 cells. We therefore tested the effects of EGCG on enzymatic activities of wild-type IDH1 and GLUD1/2 in biochemical assays, quantifying NAD(P) H production by 340 nm absorption. These experiments revealed dose-dependent inhibition of both GLUD1/2 and of IDH1 activity (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

EGCG inhibits the activity of IDH1 and GLUD1/2. IDH1 (a) and GLUD1/2 (b) activities were inhibited by EGCG, but this effect was much more pronounced in GLUD1/2. Activity was determined by measuring NADP(H)-generated absorption at 340 nm. Activity was corrected for absorption measured with cofactors, without the addition of enzyme

EGCG reduces D-2-HG production in HCT116-IDH1 wt/R132H

The effect of EGCG on IDH1 and GLUD1/2 activity predicts that EGCG inhibits the formation of α-KG and D-2-HG in IDH1mut cells. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the effects of EGCG on D-2-HG production in HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells using LC-MS. Total amounts of D-2-HG were decreased in cells treated with EGCG (Fig. 4a). This alteration was most apparent in cells incubated in DMEM containing Glc, Glu, and Gln. EGCG treatment decreased carbon flux from Glu* to D-2-HG, although this difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 4b). Because EGCG binds to serum albumin [37], possibly diminishing cellular uptake, we repeated the LC-MS experiment, but now cultured cells in serum-free medium. Under these conditions, EGCG treatment resulted in a significant reduction of 13C- flux from *Glu to D-2-HG (Additional file 1: Figure S1).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

LC-MS analysis of D-2-HG pools after treatment with EGCG. HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells were incubated in DMEM with 10% FCS, supplemented with glucose, glutamine, and/or glutamate as indicated in the presence or absence of EGCG (shaded vs. non-shaded bars respectively). a Total pools of D-2-HG after incubation in medium containing Glc and Gln (I), Glc and Glu (II), or Glc, Gln, and Glu (III). Total D-2-HG levels decreased when cultured with EGCG. Fractional enrichments (FE) of D-2-HG are displayed in b. Blue bars display the fractions of D-2-HG that were derived from Gln* (dark blue) and both Gln* and Glc* (light blue) after incubation in DMEM with Glc + Gln* (formulation Ia) and Glc* + Gln* (formulation Ib) respectively. Red bars display the fractions of D-2-HG that were derived from Glu* (dark red) and both Glu* and Glc* (light red) after incubation in DMEM with Glc + Glu* (formulation IIa) and Glc* + Glu* (formulation IIb) respectively, and the fraction of D-2-HG derived from Glu* (dark red) after incubation in DMEM with Glc, Gln, and Glu* (formulation III)

EGCG increases sensitivity of HCT116-IDH1 wt/R132H cells to radiotherapy

Because EGCG inhibits GLUD1/2 and IDH1 activity and thus NADH and NADPH production, it is expected to increase oxidative stress and sensitize cells for ionizing radiation. Colony formation assays showed that EGCG increased the sensitivity to IR of both cell lines, although at low doses (20 μM) EGCG appeared to protect cells against radiotherapy (Fig. 5a, Table 1). At higher doses of EGCG, HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells were significantly more sensitive to IR than HCT116 cells. Inhibition of IDH1R132H activity with AGI-5198 resulted in decreased radiosensitivity of EGCG-treated HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells (dotted gray lines).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

EGCG increases radiosensitivity in HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells. a Colony formation assay of HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells shows increased sensitivity to IR after treatment with EGCG compared to in HCT116. Surviving fractions were 5% (± 0.5%) vs. 16% (± 2%) for IDH1wt/R132H and IDH1wt cells, respectively, when cultured with 100 μM EGCG and irradiated with 4Gy. b Western blot quantification of phosphorylated H2AX foci in HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H and HCT116 cells, cultured with or without 100 μM EGCG and irradiated at 2 or 4 Gy. Endogenous H2AX-phosphorylation was higher in HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells than in HCT116 cells. Thirty minutes after IR, γH2AX levels further increased to higher levels in HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H than in HCT116 cells. The same trend could be observed in HT1080 (+ AGI-5198) cells (c)

Table 1

Cell survival of irradiated cells. Surviving fractions are presented as percentage surviving colonies (± standard deviation), normalized to the non-irradiated control per EGCG treatment condition. Colonies > 50 cells were considered to be derived from cells that survived radiotherapy. Surviving fractions were normalized to plating efficiency. The surviving fractions are also visualized in Fig. 5a

 

EGCG (μM)

IR (Gy)

0

20

50

100

HCT116

 0

100 (± 0)

100 (± 0)

100 (± 0)

100 (± 0)

 2

74 (± 12)

62 (± 3)

48 (± 11)

50 (± 3)

 4

44 (± 9)

37 (± 6)

19 (± 1)

16 (± 2)

HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H

 0

100 (± 0)

100 (± 0)

100 (± 0)

100 (± 0)

 2

33 (± 8)

50 (± 3)

39 (± 6)

16 (± 0.5)

 4

24 (± 5)

28 (± 7)

5 (± 0.5)

5 (± 0.5)

HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H + AGI-5198

 0

100 (± 0)

100 (± 0)

100 (± 0)

100 (± 0)

 2

44 (± 11)

46 (± 9)

55 (± 3)

57 (± 17)

 4

13 (± 4)

18 (± 2)

21 (± 2)

22 (± 6)

In addition to colony assays, we also measured γH2AX to assess IR sensitivity. Phosphorylation of histone H2AX is a rapid response to DNA-DSBs [38]. To test the direct IR-induced DNA damage, we determined levels of γH2AX in HCT116, HCT116-IDHwt/R132H, and HT1080 cells with and without AGI-5198, 30 min after irradiation with 0, 2, or 4 Gy. Endogenous levels of γH2AX were higher in HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H than in HCT116 cells (Fig. 5b) as reported before [21]. Higher irradiation doses resulted in increased levels of γH2AX, and there was a slight trend towards increased γH2AX levels after EGCG treatment of HCT116-IDHwt/R132H, but not HCT116, cells. A similar trend was observed in HT1080 cells although differences did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 5c). Of note, treatment with AGI-5198 reduced the amount of γH2AX as was shown before [21].

Discussion

Since the discovery of the frequent occurrence of IDH1 mutations in various types of cancer, research has mainly focused on the oncogenic effects of D-2-HG, the product of the mutant enzyme [39]. Recognizing the oncogenic role of D-2-HG, IDH1mut- and IDH2mut-specific drugs have been developed that inhibit the activity of the mutant enzymes [19]. We recently showed that these inhibitors not only inhibit the production of D-2-HG, but also prevent NADPH oxidation [21]. This results in normalization of the redox status of the cell and thus decreased sensitivity to IR, which may imply that these inhibitors are contra-indicated for combination treatment with IR. In glioma, mutations in IDH1 are considered ancestral, driving gliomagenesis but not necessarily glioma progression [17]. In the initial stages of neoplastic transformation, D-2-HG affects the epigenome through inhibition of α-KG-dependent DNA-and histone-demethylases [40]. However, to overcome metabolic stress induced by IDH mutations [41], during the progression of the disease, IDHmut cells need to adopt rescue mechanisms that supply the cells with the required basic level of α-KG to remain viable. The existence of such rescue pathways could explain the finding that α-KG levels are only slightly reduced in the IDH1wt/R132H-mutant glioma model E478 [32], a finding that was also made in other studies [13, 42]. Identification of these pathways potentially allows the rational selection of metabolic inhibitors for therapeutic applications.

Previous in vitro and in vivo studies reported that IDHmut cells rely on glutaminolysis for anaplerosis of glutamate and production of reduced glutathione, an important scavenger of reactive oxygen species [26, 29, 43, 44]. We recently postulated that metabolic rescue mechanisms involve direct import and anaplerotic consumption of glutamate and lactate in IDHmut, but not IDHwt gliomas based on transcriptome and MR spectroscopy experiments [16, 25, 30]. Glutamate import is regulated via excitatory amino acid transporters (EAAT) which are expressed at high levels in IDHmut-glioma cells [25] but at low levels in HCT116 cells [45]. In the present work, we provide direct evidence using 13C-tracing that glutamine and glutamate are carbon sources for D-2-HG production, even in HCT116-IDH1mut cells. In this study, we used in vitro glutamate concentrations of 4 mM, which is higher than what is observed in plasma in vivo and higher than in the extracellular space in normal brain [46]. An open question is what the levels of extracellular glutamate concentrations are in brain tumors. As shown in Fig. 1, the presence of glutamine in culture medium increased the intracellular pool of D-2-HG in HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells. In medium with *Glu in the absence of Gln, less D-2-HG was produced but the contribution of *Glu-derived carbon in D-2-HG was relatively high. We postulate that the lower total D-2-HG pools are attributed to lower uptake of glutamate relative to glutamine by HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells.

Most research on IDHmut cancers is currently performed on cell lines that overexpress IDH1mut [47, 48]. Recent evidence suggests that the IDH mutation may be one of the initial mutations that occur in glioma [49, 50]. Establishing tumor models that carry the endogenous IDH1wt/R132H mutation is difficult [51, 52], and overexpression models are not necessarily representative for the heterozygous mutation that occurs in these cancers [53]. Therefore, we here used the heterozygous HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H knock-in cell line, one of the few in vitro models carrying a heterozygous IDH1wt/R132H mutation. The use of the isogenic cell line pair (HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H and HCT116) allowed us to link the IDH1 mutation to sensitivity to GLUD inhibition. Our results may also have relevance to other IDH1mut cancer types, as IDH mutations are also found in colorectal cancers, although at low frequency [17, 54]. Even though the importance of glutamate and glutamine as an anaplerotic fuel might differ between cancer types due to the nature of cells, inhibition of the processing pathway downstream of glutamine will hamper the cancer cells either way.

Previous studies have shown that the glutaminase (GLS) inhibitor BPTES inhibits proliferation of IDHmut cells [48]. The potential of cells to bypass GLS activity by directly using glutamate instead of glutamine is a possible explanation for the relatively small inhibitory effect of BPTES in that study. Therefore, inhibiting glutamatolysis at the level of GLUD1/2 may be a more effective strategy. EGCG affects the production of D-2-HG, among others, by diminishing the supply of α-KG by inhibition of GLUD1/2 but likely also by inhibition of the IDH1wt subunit, and simultaneously deteriorates the redox status by inhibiting NAD(P) H production. In this way, EGCG has clear benefits over inhibitors that only inhibit GLS or mutant IDH activity directly. Glu-derived D-2-HG production was inhibited more by EGCG than Gln-derived D-2-HG. We explain this by the fact that GLUD has both a mitochondrial and cytosolic isoform, while GLS is mitochondrial. As EGCG cannot enter the mitochondrial matrix [55] Gln may lead to the production of mitochondrial glutamate and α-KG that may be processed in the TCA cycle instead of being converted in the cytosol D-2-HG.

Cell growth was reduced by EGCG in both HCT116 and HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cell lines. We attribute this to the fact that EGCG inhibits multiple NADP+-dependent enzymes including IDH1wt [36]. We hypothesize that the significantly larger effect of EGCG on HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells is caused by a higher GLUD dependency compared to HCT116 cells. However, it should be realized that EGCG is a pleiotropic compound, and activities other than GLUD and IDH inhibition also may have played a role in the observed effects.

A direct relationship between EGCG and increased oxidative stress was established by its sensitizing effect on radiotherapy, which was significantly higher in HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells, as demonstrated by decreased survival in colony forming assays and as suggested by increased DNA-DSB after IR at high doses of EGCG. Interestingly, a recent report described that D-2-HG in IDH1mut cancers inhibits the activity of the α-KG-dependent DNA repair enzyme alkB homolog (ALKBH) [56]. This may provide an additional explanation for increased baseline sensitivity of IDH1mut cancers to radiation therapy and alkylating chemotherapy. The decreased IR sensitivity of HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H treated with AGI-5198 is in agreement with this hypothesis.

EGCG has several other effects next to the inhibition of GLUD. It can inhibit histone and DNA demethylases, reactivate tumor suppressor genes [5759], and inhibit fatty acid synthase [60] and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, the rate-limiting enzyme in the pentose phosphate pathway and a provider of NADPH [61]. Furthermore, EGCG has been reported to inhibit epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced activation of the EGF-receptor (EGFR) [62], a frequently encountered aberrant oncogenic pathway in glioblastoma and many other cancers. The combination of these effects provides a solid rationale to test EGCG as an adjuvant treatment to radiotherapy, and possibly chemotherapy, also in IDHwt cancers. However, our data also show that the effects of EGCG may be dose-dependent, having a radioprotective effect on HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells at low doses. This may be due to both its anti-oxidative and pro-oxidative effects [63] and warrants extra investigation.

One problem that requires attention is the bioavailability and stability of EGCG in vivo [55, 64, 65]. Anticancer effects of EGCG can be diminished due to oxidation of the compound [66], resulting in low circulating doses after oral administration [67, 68]. Furthermore, EGCG in the circulation is mostly albumin-associated, increasing stability but decreasing bioavailability [37]. Methods to increase bioavailability via nanomedicine and controlled delivery are currently being explored [69, 70].

Conclusions

HCT116-IDH1wt/R132H cells use glutamine and glutamate as direct sources for α-KG anaplerosis and D-2-HG production. EGCG, a derivative of green tea, inhibits glutamate processing at the level of GLUD1/2, reduces proliferation rates, decreases production of D-2-HG, and increases sensitivity to radiotherapy in IDH1wt/R132H cells. Additional studies are required to test these concepts in vivo and to investigate effective ways of delivering EGCG to the brain.

Notes

Abbreviations

ALKBH: 

AlkB homolog

BSA: 

Bovine serum albumin

D-2-HG: 

D-2-hydroxyglutarate

D-2-HG*: 

[1-13C]- D-2-hydroxyglutarate

D2O: 

Deuterated water

DAPI: 

4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole

DSB: 

Double-strand break

EGCG: 

Epigallocatechin-3-gallate

EGF: 

Epidermal growth factor

EGFR: 

Epidermal growth factor receptor

FCS: 

Fetal calf serum

Glc: 

Glucose

Glc*: 

[1,6-13C2]-glucose

Gln: 

Glutamine

Gln*: 

[1-13C]-glutamine

GLS: 

Glutaminase

Glu: 

Glutamate

Glu*: 

[1-13C]-glutamate

GLUD: 

Glutamate dehydrogenase

H2AX: 

H2A histone family member X

ICT: 

Isocitrate

IDH: 

Isocitrate dehydrogenase

IR: 

Ionizing radiation

LC-MS: 

Liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy

NMR: 

Nuclear magnetic resonance

NS: 

Number of averages

PARP: 

Poly-ADP ribose polymerase

SRB: 

Sulforhodamine B

TCA: 

Tricarboxylic acid

TET: 

Ten-eleven translocation

TR: 

Repetition time

α-KG: 

α-ketoglutarate

γH2AX: 

Phosphorylated H2AX

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. S. Pusch from DKFZ Heidelberg, Germany for providing IDH1 GST-fusion proteins and prof. Dr. R. van Noorden and M. Khurshed (Amsterdam UMC) for helpful discussions.

Funding

This work was supported by Dutch Cancer Society grant UvA 2014-6839 (KL). TP was supported by EFRO/GO project Ultrasense NMR.

Availability of data and materials

Data is available from the corresponding author upon request.

Authors’ contributions

KL, TP, and CH were responsible for the cell culture. TP and VB designed, performed, and analyzed all the NMR experiments, supervised by AH. AR and SL performed the LC-MS experiments, supervised by RW, analyzed together with TP and VB. Cell proliferation and enzymatic assays were performed and analyzed by KL. Colony-forming assays and DNA-DSB experiments were designed by, performed, and analyzed by KL, RM, and PS. TP, KL, RM, WL, AH, and VB interpreted the experimental results. TP, KL, WL, and AH wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 Nijmegen, HB, The Netherlands
(2)
Department of Biochemistry, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Geert Grooteplein 26, 6525 Nijmegen, GA, The Netherlands
(3)
Department of Medical Biology, Cancer Center Amsterdam at the Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 Amsterdam, AZ, The Netherlands
(4)
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 Nijmegen, HB, The Netherlands
(5)
Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapy and OncoImmunology Laboratory, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 Nijmegen, HB, The Netherlands

References

  1. Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P, et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008;321(5897):1807–12.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Ohgaki H, Kleihues P. Genetic pathways to primary and secondary glioblastoma. Am J Pathol. 2007;170(5):1445–53.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Yan H, Parsons DW, Jin G, McLendon R, Rasheed BA, Yuan W, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(8):765–73.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Mardis ER, Ding L, Dooling DJ, Larson DE, McLellan MD, Chen K, et al. Recurring mutations found by sequencing an acute myeloid leukemia genome. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1058–66.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Amary MF, Bacsi K, Maggiani F, Damato S, Halai D, Berisha F, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent events in central chondrosarcoma and central and periosteal chondromas but not in other mesenchymal tumours. J Pathol. 2011;224(3):334–43.Google Scholar
  6. Iannaci G, Luise R, Sapere P, Costanzo RM, Rossiello R. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma: a very rare case report of primary tumor of the colon-rectum and review of the literature. Pathol Res Pract. 2013;209(6):393–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Borger DR, Tanabe KK, Fan KC, Lopez HU, Fantin VR, Straley KS, et al. Frequent mutation of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 and IDH2 in cholangiocarcinoma identified through broad-based tumor genotyping. Oncologist. 2012;17(1):72–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fathi AT, Sadrzadeh H, Comander AH, Higgins MJ, Bardia A, Perry A, et al. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation in breast adenocarcinoma is associated with elevated levels of serum and urine 2-hydroxyglutarate. Oncologist. 2014;19(6):602–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Hinsch A, Brolund M, Hube-Magg C, Kluth M, Simon R, Moller-Koop C, et al. Immunohistochemically detected IDH1(R132H) mutation is rare and mostly heterogeneous in prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2018;36(6):877–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Leonardi R, Subramanian C, Jackowski S, Rock CO. Cancer-associated isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations inactivate NADPH-dependent reductive carboxylation. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(18):14615–20.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Bleeker FE, Atai NA, Lamba S, Jonker A, Rijkeboer D, Bosch KS, et al. The prognostic IDH1( R132 ) mutation is associated with reduced NADP+-dependent IDH activity in glioblastoma. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119(4):487–94.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. van Lith SA, Navis AC, Lenting K, Verrijp K, Schepens JT, Hendriks WJ, et al. Identification of a novel inactivating mutation in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1-R314C) in a high grade astrocytoma. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30486.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Dang L, White DW, Gross S, Bennett BD, Bittinger MA, Driggers EM, et al. Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature. 2009;462(7274):739–44.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Kats LM, Reschke M, Taulli R, Pozdnyakova O, Burgess K, Bhargava P, et al. Proto-oncogenic role of mutant IDH2 in leukemia initiation and maintenance. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14(3):329–41.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Chowdhury R, Yeoh KK, Tian YM, Hillringhaus L, Bagg EA, Rose NR, et al. The oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate inhibits histone lysine demethylases. EMBO Rep. 2011;12(5):463–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. van Lith SA, Navis AC, Verrijp K, Niclou SP, Bjerkvig R, Wesseling P, et al. Glutamate as chemotactic fuel for diffuse glioma cells: are they glutamate suckers? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1846(1):66–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Molenaar RJ, Radivoyevitch T, Maciejewski JP, van Noorden CJ, Bleeker FE. The driver and passenger effects of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations in oncogenesis and survival prolongation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1846(2):326–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Molenaar RJ, Thota S, Nagata Y, Patel B, Clemente M, Przychodzen B, et al. Clinical and biological implications of ancestral and non-ancestral IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in myeloid neoplasms. Leukemia. 2015;29(11):2134–42.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Rohle D, Popovici-Muller J, Palaskas N, Turcan S, Grommes C, Campos C, et al. An inhibitor of mutant IDH1 delays growth and promotes differentiation of glioma cells. Science. 2013;340(6132):626–30.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Stein EM, DiNardo CD, Pollyea DA, Fathi AT, Roboz GJ, Altman JK, et al. Enasidenib in mutant IDH2 relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2017;130(6):722–31.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Molenaar RJ, Botman D, Smits MA, Hira VV, van Lith SA, Stap J, et al. Radioprotection of IDH1-mutated cancer cells by the IDH1-mutant inhibitor AGI-5198. Cancer Res. 2015;75(22):4790–802.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Khurshed M, Aarnoudse N, Hulsbos R, Hira VVV, van Laarhoven HWM, Wilmink JW, et al. IDH1-mutant cancer cells are sensitive to cisplatin and an IDH1-mutant inhibitor counteracts this sensitivity. FASEB J. 2018:fj201800547R. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201800547R.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Molenaar RJ, Radivoyevitch T, Nagata Y, Khurshed M, Przychodzen B, Makishima H, et al. IDH1/2 mutations sensitize acute myeloid leukemia to PARP inhibition and this is reversed by IDH1/2-mutant inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(7):1705–15.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Lu Y, Kwintkiewicz J, Liu Y, Tech K, Frady LN, Su YT, et al. Chemosensitivity of IDH1-mutated gliomas due to an impairment in PARP1-mediated DNA repair. Cancer Res. 2017;77(7):1709–18.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Lenting K, Khurshed M, Peeters TH, van den Heuvel C, van Lith SAM, de Bitter T, et al. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1-mutated human gliomas depend on lactate and glutamate to alleviate metabolic stress. FASEB J. 2019;33(1):557–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fack F, Tardito S, Hochart G, Oudin A, Zheng L, Fritah S, et al. Altered metabolic landscape in IDH-mutant gliomas affects phospholipid, energy, and oxidative stress pathways. EMBO Mol Med. 2017;9(12):1681–95.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Izquierdo-Garcia JL, Viswanath P, Eriksson P, Chaumeil MM, Pieper RO, Phillips JJ, et al. Metabolic reprogramming in mutant IDH1 glioma cells. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0118781.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Viswanath P, Chaumeil MM, Ronen SM. Molecular imaging of metabolic reprogramming in mutant IDH cells. Front Oncol. 2016;6:60.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Salamanca-Cardona L, Shah H, Poot AJ, Correa FM, Di Gialleonardo V, Lui H, et al. In vivo imaging of glutamine metabolism to the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate in IDH1/2 mutant tumors. Cell Metab. 2017;26(6):830–41 e3.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Khurshed M, Molenaar RJ, Lenting K, Leenders WP, van Noorden CJF. In silico gene expression analysis reveals glycolysis and acetate anaplerosis in IDH1 wild-type glioma and lactate and glutamate anaplerosis in IDH1-mutated glioma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:49165–77.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Fernandez SL, Russell DW, Hurlin PJ. Development of human gene reporter cell lines using rAAV mediated homologous recombination. Biol Proced Online. 2007;9:84–90.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Navis AC, Niclou SP, Fack F, Stieber D, van Lith S, Verrijp K, et al. Increased mitochondrial activity in a novel IDH1-R132H mutant human oligodendroglioma xenograft model: in situ detection of 2-HG and alpha-KG. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2013;1:18.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Vichai V, Kirtikara K. Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(3):1112–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pusch S, Schweizer L, Beck AC, Lehmler JM, Weissert S, Balss J, et al. D-2-Hydroxyglutarate producing neo-enzymatic activity inversely correlates with frequency of the type of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations found in glioma. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2014;2:19.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Lenting K, Verhaak R, Ter Laan M, Wesseling P, Leenders W. Glioma: experimental models and reality. Acta Neuropathol. 2017;133:263–82.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Shin ES, Park J, Shin JM, Cho D, Cho SY, Shin DW, et al. Catechin gallates are NADP+-competitive inhibitors of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and other enzymes that employ NADP+ as a coenzyme. Bioorg Med Chem. 2008;16(7):3580–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Zinellu A, Sotgia S, Scanu B, Forteschi M, Giordo R, Cossu A, et al. Human serum albumin increases the stability of green tea catechins in aqueous physiological conditions. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0134690.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Redon C, Pilch D, Rogakou E, Sedelnikova O, Newrock K, Bonner W. Histone H2A variants H2AX and H2AZ. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002;12(2):162–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Borodovsky A, Seltzer MJ, Riggins GJ. Altered cancer cell metabolism in gliomas with mutant IDH1 or IDH2. Curr Opin Oncol. 2012;24(1):83–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Malzkorn B, Wolter M, Riemenschneider MJ, Reifenberger G. Unraveling the glioma epigenome: from molecular mechanisms to novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Brain Pathol. 2011;21(6):619–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Shi J, Sun B, Shi W, Zuo H, Cui D, Ni L, et al. Decreasing GSH and increasing ROS in chemosensitivity gliomas with IDH1 mutation. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(2):655–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Reitman ZJ, Jin G, Karoly ED, Spasojevic I, Yang J, Kinzler KW, et al. Profiling the effects of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations on the cellular metabolome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(8):3270–5.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Izquierdo-Garcia JL, Viswanath P, Eriksson P, Cai L, Radoul M, Chaumeil MM, et al. IDH1 mutation induces reprogramming of pyruvate metabolism. Cancer Res. 2015;75(15):2999–3009.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. McBrayer SK, Mayers JR, DiNatale GJ, Shi DD, Khanal J, Chakraborty AA, et al. Transaminase inhibition by 2-hydroxyglutarate impairs glutamate biosynthesis and redox homeostasis in glioma. Cell. 2018;175(1):101–16 e25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Pedraz-Cuesta E, Christensen S, Jensen AA, Jensen NF, Bunch L, Romer MU, et al. The glutamate transport inhibitor DL-Threo-beta-Benzyloxyaspartic acid (DL-TBOA) differentially affects SN38- and oxaliplatin-induced death of drug-resistant colorectal cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:411.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Hawkins RA. The blood-brain barrier and glutamate. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(3):867S–74S.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Izquierdo-Garcia JL, Cai LM, Chaumeil MM, Eriksson P, Robinson AE, Pieper RO, et al. Glioma cells with the IDH1 mutation modulate metabolic fractional flux through pyruvate carboxylase. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e108289.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Seltzer MJ, Bennett BD, Joshi AD, Gao P, Thomas AG, Ferraris DV, et al. Inhibition of glutaminase preferentially slows growth of glioma cells with mutant IDH1. Cancer Res. 2010;70(22):8981–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Johnson BE, Mazor T, Hong C, Barnes M, Aihara K, McLean CY, et al. Mutational analysis reveals the origin and therapy-driven evolution of recurrent glioma. Science. 2014;343(6167):189–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Watanabe T, Nobusawa S, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H. IDH1 mutations are early events in the development of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. Am J Pathol. 2009;174(4):1149–53.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Piaskowski S, Bienkowski M, Stoczynska-Fidelus E, Stawski R, Sieruta M, Szybka M, et al. Glioma cells showing IDH1 mutation cannot be propagated in standard cell culture conditions. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(6):968–70.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Luchman HA, Stechishin OD, Dang NH, Blough MD, Chesnelong C, Kelly JJ, et al. An in vivo patient-derived model of endogenous IDH1-mutant glioma. Neuro-Oncology. 2012;14(2):184–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Garrett M, Sperry J, Braas D, Yan W, Le TM, Mottahedeh J, et al. Metabolic characterization of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant and IDH wildtype gliomaspheres uncovers cell type-specific vulnerabilities. Cancer Metab. 2018;6:4.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Li J, Huang J, Huang F, Jin Q, Zhu H, Wang X, et al. Decreased expression of IDH1-R132H correlates with poor survival in gastrointestinal cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(45):73638–50.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Weng Z, Zhou P, Salminen WF, Yang X, Harrill AH, Cao Z, et al. Green tea epigallocatechin gallate binds to and inhibits respiratory complexes in swelling but not normal rat hepatic mitochondria. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;443(3):1097–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang P, Wu J, Ma S, Zhang L, Yao J, Hoadley KA, et al. Oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate inhibits ALKBH DNA repair enzymes and sensitizes IDH mutant cells to alkylating agents. Cell Rep. 2015;13(11):2353–61.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Khan MA, Hussain A, Sundaram MK, Alalami U, Gunasekera D, Ramesh L, et al. (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate reverses the expression of various tumor-suppressor genes by inhibiting DNA methyltransferases and histone deacetylases in human cervical cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2015;33(4):1976–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Gao Y, Tollefsbol TO. Impact of epigenetic dietary components on cancer through histone modifications. Curr Med Chem. 2015;22(17):2051–64.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Nandakumar V, Vaid M, Katiyar SK. (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate reactivates silenced tumor suppressor genes, Cip1/p21 and p16INK4a, by reducing DNA methylation and increasing histones acetylation in human skin cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32(4):537–44.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Puig T, Relat J, Marrero PF, Haro D, Brunet J, Colomer R. Green tea catechin inhibits fatty acid synthase without stimulating carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 or inducing weight loss in experimental animals. Anticancer Res. 2008;28(6A):3671–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Gelman SJ, Naser F, Mahieu NG, McKenzie LD, Dunn GP, Chheda MG, et al. Consumption of NADPH for 2-HG synthesis increases pentose phosphate pathway flux and sensitizes cells to oxidative stress. Cell Rep. 2018;22(2):512–22.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Liang YC, Lin-shiau SY, Chen CF, Lin JK. Suppression of extracellular signals and cell proliferation through EGF receptor binding by (-)-epigallocatechin gallate in human A431 epidermoid carcinoma cells. J Cell Biochem. 1997;67(1):55–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Kim HS, Quon MJ, Kim JA. New insights into the mechanisms of polyphenols beyond antioxidant properties; lessons from the green tea polyphenol, epigallocatechin 3-gallate. Redox Biol. 2014;2:187–95.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Le CT, Leenders WPJ, Molenaar RJ, van Noorden CJF. Effects of the green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate on glioma: a critical evaluation of the literature. Nutr Cancer. 2018;70(3):317–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Kaur H, Kumar B, Chakrabarti A, Medhi B, Modi M, Radotra BD, et al. A new therapeutic approach for brain delivery of epigallocatechin gallate: development and characterization studies. Curr Drug Deliv. 2019;16(1):59–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Krupkova O, Ferguson SJ, Wuertz-Kozak K. Stability of (-)-epigallocatechin gallate and its activity in liquid formulations and delivery systems. J Nutr Biochem. 2016;37:1–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Lin LC, Wang MN, Tseng TY, Sung JS, Tsai TH. Pharmacokinetics of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in conscious and freely moving rats and its brain regional distribution. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55(4):1517–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Zeng L, Holly JM, Perks CM. Effects of physiological levels of the green tea extract epigallocatechin-3-gallate on breast cancer cells. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014;5:61.Google Scholar
  69. Tyagi N, De R, Begun J, Popat A. Cancer therapeutics with epigallocatechin-3-gallate encapsulated in biopolymeric nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 2017;518(1–2):220–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Velavan B, Divya T, Sureshkumar A, Sudhandiran G. Nano-chemotherapeutic efficacy of (-) -epigallocatechin 3-gallate mediating apoptosis in A549cells: involvement of reactive oxygen species mediated Nrf2/Keap1signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;503:1723–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement