Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Ets-1 global gene expression profile reveals associations with metabolism and oxidative stress in ovarian and breast cancers

Cancer & Metabolism20131:17

https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-3002-1-17

©  Verschoor et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

  • Received: 26 February 2013
  • Accepted: 2 July 2013
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The Ets-1 proto-oncogene is frequently upregulated in cancer cells, with known involvement in cancer angiogenesis, metastasis, and more recently energy metabolism. In this study we have performed various bioinformatic analyses on existing microarray data to further clarify the role of Ets-1 in ovarian cancer, and validated these results with functional assays.

Methods

Functional pathway analyses were conducted on existing microarray data comparing 2008 and 2008-Ets1 ovarian cancer cells. Methods included over-representation analysis, functional class scoring and pathway topology, and network representations were visualized in Cytoscape. Oxidative stress regulation was examined in ovarian cancer cells by measuring protein expression and enzyme activity of glutathione peroxidases, as well as intracellular reactive oxygen species using dichlorofluorescin fluorescence. A stable Ets-1 knockdown MDA-MB-231 cell line was created using short hairpin RNA, and glycolytic dependence of these cells was measured following treatment with 2-deoxy-D-glucose and Hoechst nuclear staining to determine cell number. High-resolution respirometry was performed to measure changes in basal oxygen flux between MDA-MB-231 cells and MDA-Ets1KD variants.

Results

Enrichments in oxidoreductase activity and various metabolic pathways were observed upon integration of the different analyses, suggesting that Ets-1 is important in their regulation. As oxidative stress is closely associated with these pathways, we functionally validated our observations by showing that Ets-1 overexpression resulted in decreased reactive oxygen species with increased glutathione peroxidase expression and activity, thereby regulating cellular oxidative stress. To extend our findings to another cancer type, we developed an Ets-1 knockdown breast cancer cell model, which displayed decreased glycolytic dependence and increased oxygen consumption following Ets-1 knockdown confirming our earlier findings.

Conclusions

Collectively, this study confirms the important role of Ets-1 in the regulation of cancer energy metabolism in ovarian and breast cancers. Furthermore, Ets-1 is a key regulator of oxidative stress in ovarian cancer cells by mediating alterations in glutathione antioxidant capacity.

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Ets-1
  • Metabolism
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Oxidative stress

Background

Ets-1 is a member of the E-26 (Ets) family of transcription factors, and was first characterized as a proto-oncogene of the retroviral v-ets oncogene in avian leukemia retrovirus E26 [1]. This family of transcription factors currently comprises 28 members, many of which are known to be elevated in various cancers [2, 3] including Ets-2 [4–9], Friend leukemia integration 1 [10], Ets-related gene [4], Polyomavirus enhancer activator 3 homolog [11, 12], Ets-related molecule [11], Prostate epithelium-specific Ets transcription factor [13] and E74-like factor-3 [11]. All known Ets family members contain a core double-stranded DNA binding element that recognizes the consensus sequence GGAA/T [14, 15]. Because the Ets binding element is simple and generic, there is significant functional redundancy among Ets factors, allowing for complex transcriptional networks depending on which factors are bound to a specific promoter. The diverse functional roles of these factors include differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, malignant transformation and metastasis, which are all processes relevant to the study of cancer.

High levels of Ets-1 expression are observed in a wide variety of cancer types including those of the breast, prostate and ovary; this suggests that the association between Ets-1 expression and tumor progression is a generalized phenomena [16]. Ets-1 upregulation appears to associate specifically with more advanced, invasive tumors in breast and ovarian carcinomas [17–22], and is positively correlated with the enhanced metastatic potential of numerous cancers [17, 23–26]. Indeed, there are many well-established target genes for Ets-1 that are closely linked to cancer progression, particularly mediators of extracellular matrix degradation, cancer cell migration and angiogenesis [16, 25, 27–31]. Thus, the consequences of Ets-1 overexpression are particularly relevant to the study of ovarian cancer as this type of malignancy is very difficult to detect, and is most commonly diagnosed at advanced stages of disease progression that include metastases. Comparing the transcriptional programs of cancer cells that express low levels of Ets-1 protein to those that express Ets-1 protein in abundance will create a gene expression profile illustrating some of the key differences between invasive and non-invasive ovarian cancer cells.

Recently, our laboratory showed the importance of Ets-1 as a regulator of cellular metabolism in ovarian cancer cells, where Ets-1 overexpression resulted in increased glycolysis while suppressing oxidative phosphorylation, a phenomena known as the Warburg effect [32]. The objective of the present study was to examine the functional interactions of the potential downstream targets of Ets-1 identified in the microarray analysis from our previous work. In our previous study, we used a stable Ets-1 overexpression model in 2008 ovarian cancer cells to conduct whole genome microarray analysis, which we have more comprehensively examined here to further clarify the role of Ets-1 in ovarian tumorigenesis. We have utilized three different approaches of bioinformatic pathway analysis, and compared them to identify the pathway associations that are common to each method in order to delineate the most important pathways represented following Ets-1 overexpression. The findings from our pathway-based network analyses illustrate the importance of Ets-1 expression in cancer-associated metabolic regulation in ovarian cancer.

The most novel finding among other commonly enriched functional pathways we identified was likely that of pathways involving the regulation of cellular redox status. To provide some validation for this finding, we examined the protein expression of elevated targets involved in the regulation of cellular redox status, and measured intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in ovarian cancer cells overexpressing Ets-1. Additionally, to investigate the ability of our findings to extend to other types of human cancer, we developed an Ets-1 knockdown model in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, as aggressive breast cancer is frequently associated with the overexpression of Ets-1 [17, 21, 22, 33]. Because metabolic pathways were the most common pathway association with changes to Ets-1, and because we have previously established an association between energy metabolism and Ets-1 in ovarian cancer cells, we used this model to examine the significance of Ets-1 knockdown on glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation. We observed that Ets-1 regulation of cancer-specific metabolic changes is a phenomenon that also exists in breast cancer cells, thus complementing our previous work and suggesting that Ets-1 regulation of metabolism may be a generalized phenomenon.

Methods

Cell culture

The human ovarian carcinoma cell line 2008 was kindly provided by Dr Paul Andrews (Georgetown University, Rockville, MD, US) [34]. MDA-MB-231 human mammary epithelial adenocarcinoma cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC# HTB-26). The 2008 cells were maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 2% penicillin/streptomycin. MDA-MB-231 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 2% penicillin/streptomycin. Stable cell lines 2008-Ets1 and MDA-Ets1KD were maintained in growth medium as described with the addition of 200 ng/ml selective antibiotic. All cells were kept at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Media and supplements were purchased from Invitrogen Life Technologies (Burlington, ONT, Canada), and fetal bovine serum from Fisher Scientific (Ottawa, ONT, Canada). All reagents were purchased from Sigma (Oakville, ONT, Canada).

Microarray pathway analysis

Ontological analysis was performed using the online software DAVID [35]. Gene lists composed of probe sets showing absolute linear fold-change differences ≥2 and q-values ≤0.05 were compared against the HuGene-1_0-st-v1 background list supplied by DAVID. Functional annotation charts were produced for ontological categories of interest comprising at least 10 genes, and functional annotation clustering was performed at high classification stringency. Ranked gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed to identify significantly enriched gene sets between 2008 and 2008-Ets1 gene expression profiles as described previously [36, 37].

Complex network analysis and visualization was performed using Cytoscape, an open source bioinformatics software package [38]. The Network analyzer plugin was used to perform statistical calculations and visualizations of topological parameters and centrality measures for the biological networks generated from the various analyses [39]. Normalized gene expression data from the microarray was used to create a large, comprehensive network using Reactome Function Interaction (FI) using a size of 10 and an average correlation minimum of 0.75 [40]. This plugin utilizes the Reactome FI network of human protein interactions to create a specific sub-network based on the differentially regulated genes in the microarray. The Enrichment Map plugin [41] was used to generate networks derived from the GSEA results, and the MCODE plugin [42] was used to further cluster the GSEA enrichment map.

Protein isolation and western blot analysis

Whole cell lysates were collected, 30 μg of protein was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE electrophoresis, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and blocked for 1 h in 5% skim milk Tris-buffered saline with Tween. Membranes were incubated overnight with antibody reactive to Ets-1 (Abcam, Boston, MA, US), glutathione peroxidases 1 and 2 (GPX1 and 2; Abcam) or Actin (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, US) in 0.5% Tris-buffered saline with Tween. Following primary antibody incubation, membranes were washed and incubated for 2 h with horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-mouse or anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G secondary antibody (Cell Signaling). Proteins were detected by ECL chemiluminescence reagent (Amersham Biosciences, Baie D’Urfe, QC, Canada), and exposed to film. Densitometry analysis was performed using ImageJ software developed by Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA [43].

Intracellular reactive oxygen species and glutathione peroxidase activity assays

Intracellular ROS levels were measured using CM2-H2DCFDA reagent (Invitrogen), which is cleaved once inside the cell allowing the DCF dye to bind to ROS species, resulting in fluorescence. Cells were plated in 96-well plates and grown to 70% to 90% confluency in phenol red-free medium. CM2-H2DCFDA reagent was reconstituted in dimethyl sulfoxide, and 10 μM was added to each experimental well using phenol red-free medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum. Following a 30 min incubation to allow the dye to load into cells, plates were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and allowed to recover in phenol red-free medium for 10 minutes. Plates were then treated with 250 μM H2O2 and read in a Cytofluor fluorescent plate reader at 485 nm excitation and 530 nm emission for 1 h. Plates were then stained with crystal violet, dried overnight, solubilized with SDS, and read at 570 nm. Arbitrary fluorescent values were normalized to crystal violet absorbance values, and reported as arbitrary fluorescent units (AFU). Glutathione peroxidase enzyme activity was measured using the GPX activity kit from Enzo Life Sciences (Farmingdale, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer instructions.

Ets-1 knockdown breast cancer model

MDA-MB-231 cells were plated in 6-well plates at 1.5 × 105 cells per well, incubated for 24 h, then transfected with 1 μg of the pSM2 retroviral vector (Open Biosystems, Huntsville, AL, US) containing a pre-designed short hairpin RNA sequence targeting Ets-1 (SH2588-A-5) or a non-silencing control vector (RHS1703) using Arrest-Into (Open Biosystems). Plates were exposed to selection medium containing 2 μg/ml Puromycin over 3 weeks, and surviving clones were isolated, expanded and tested for Ets-1 protein expression via western blotting. The clone with the lowest Ets-1 protein expression was expanded and will be referred to as MDA-Ets1KD cells in this study.

RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent as indicated by the manufacturer (Invitrogen). RNA samples were DNase treated using Turbo DNA-free™ as per the manufacturer’s directions (Invitrogen), and 3 μg of total cellular RNA was reverse-transcribed using the Superscript III First Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time PCR was conducted using Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix UDG (Invitrogen) with primers sequences listed in Additional file 1. All target gene expression was normalized to the pooled gene expression values of β-actin, B-2 macroglobulin, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and RNA polymerase II as housekeeping controls. Data were normalized and efficiency corrected using the ΔΔCt method of relative quantification, where statistical significance and standard error were determined from ΔCt values.

Measurement of glycolytic dependency

The glycolytic dependency assays were performed as described previously [32]. Briefly, cells were treated with 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG), which was administered at concentrations ranging from 1 to 7.5 mM over 96 h, at which time a Hoechst DNA content assay (Invitrogen) was performed. Cell number was standardized to fluorescence for each cell type by comparison with a standard curve of known cell numbers.

Oxygen consumption assay

The oxygen consumption assay was performed as described previously [32]. Briefly, harvested cells were added to the oxygraph chambers containing 1.8 mL of KCl medium and the total O2 concentration and flux was recorded at one second intervals throughout the duration of the experiment. Once the oxygen concentration stabilized, cells were permeabilized with digitonin and treated with various respiratory substrates and inhibitors. OROBOROS software was used for data acquisition and analysis (OROBOROS Instruments GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria).

Statistical analysis

Data is presented as the mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. Statistically significant differences between sample groups were determined using a Student’s t-test or analysis of variance where applicable, with a P-value ≤0.05 considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Global gene expression analysis

We previously performed comparative microarray analysis of 2008 and 2008-Ets1 ovarian cancer cells [32, 44], which revealed a large amount of differentially regulated genes. Subsequent real-time qRT-PCR validation was examined, and gene expression changes greater than 1.5-fold were deemed valid and included in this study. The complete raw data is available via the GEO database under accession number [GEO:GSE21129].

Reactome FI was used to create a global human interaction network for the differentially regulated genes in our microarray data set (Figure 1). This plugin was specifically created to find network patterns pertaining to cancer, by building a network of highly interacting gene groups, referred to as modules. To decrease the complexity of the network generated, the module size was set to a minimum of 10 interacting genes, average correlation set to 0.75, and false discovery rate (FDR) set to 0.25 [40]. The resulting network contained 275 nodes of curated and predicted protein interactions clustered into 16 functional modules as delineated by different node coloring (Figure 1). Functional pathway enrichment analysis (FDR <0.01) was performed on the large network to identify the major pathways and ontological terms associated with each module of interacting genes. The module functions with the highest gene set ratio, and thereby the most important pathways annotated, included cell cycle regulation, RNA splicing, wingless-type (WNT) signaling and metabolic pathways, as well as insulin synthesis and secretion (identified by colored outlines in Figure 1). The gene set ratio is a measure of the number of enriched genes present in a data set compared to the total number of genes within the curated gene set, and thus a good indicator of the relative importance of each pathway within the data set. The individual genes contained in the most important outlined modules are detailed in Additional file 2.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Global functional interaction network. Reactome FI was used to create a functional interaction network, which is divided into modules as defined by node coloring, and further delineated by functional pathway enrichments into outlined, color-coded groups. Major associations among the curated and predicted interactions included cell cycle regulatory, RNA slicing, metabolism, WNT signaling, and insulin-related pathways (FDR <0.01). Network was generated in Cytoscape.

Gene ontology

Functional annotation clustering of the differentially regulated genes was completed using DAVID, an online database of functional annotation tools. This software identifies which annotation groups are enriched in a list of differentially expressed genes by grouping functionally similar terms associated with these genes into annotation clusters. Meaningful functional relationships can then be inferred from the functional categories that are significantly over-represented within the list of enriched genes. Under the highest classification stringency, eight annotation clusters were identified as significantly enriched in our microarray data set (Table 1). Clusters relevant to our functional pathway enrichment analysis (Figure 1) included oxidoreductase activity relating to fatty acid desaturation (cluster 1), unsaturated fatty acid metabolism (cluster 2), D-Aspartate:2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase activity (cluster 3), and dihydrodiol dehydrogenase activity (cluster 4). We have reported the P-value and fold enrichment for each annotation cluster. The P-value represents the threshold of EASE Score, which is a modified Fisher exact P-value used for gene-enrichment analysis to determine the significance of the gene set enrichment. The measure of fold enrichment represents a ratio of the proportion of input genes present within a gene set compared to the number of genes that term represents in the human genome background data set [35]. Thus, a low P-value combined with a high fold enrichment together indicate a high magnitude of enrichment for that particular ontology term. Our findings indicated that the best enrichments relating to Ets-1 overexpression included fatty acid desaturation (annotation clusters 1 and 2) and dihydrodiol dehydrogenase activity (annotation cluster 4).
Table 1

Functional annotation clustering of genes associated with Ets-1 overexpression

Annotation cluster

Index

Term

P

Fold enrichment

1

INTERPRO

IPR010257:Fatty acid desaturase, type 1, N-terminal

0.00

15.75

GOTERM_MF_ALL

GO:0016717~Oxidoreductase activity (O or H2O as acceptor)

0.00

13.63

INTERPRO

IPR005804:Fatty acid desaturase, type 1

0.00

13.13

2

PANTHER_FAMILY

PTHR19353:Fatty acid desaturase 2

0.001

20.40

INTERPRO

IPR012171:Fatty acid/sphingolipid desaturase

0.001

19.69

PIR_SUPERFAMILY

PIRSF015921:Fatty acid desaturase/sphingolipid desaturase

0.001

19.22

GOTERM_BP_ALL

GO:0006636~Unsaturated fatty acid biosynthetic process

0.001

14.89

GOTERM_BP_ALL

GO:0033559~Unsaturated fatty acid metabolic process

0.001

14.89

3

KEGG_REACTION

R05053:D-aspartate + D-4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate <=> Oxaloacetate + L-erythro-4-hydroxyglutamate

0.001

2.78

KEGG_COMPOUND

C05947:L-erythro-4-hydroxyglutamate

0.001

2.76

KEGG_COMPOUND

C05946:D-4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate

0.001

2.76

KEGG_COMPOUND

C00036:Oxaloacetate

0.001

2.76

KEGG_COMPOUND

C00402:D-aspartate

0.001

2.76

4

GOTERM_MF_ALL

GO:0047115~trans-1,2-dihydrobenzene-1,2-diol dehydrogenase activity

0.001

20.44

EC_NUMBER

1.1.1.213

0.001

16.92

EC_NUMBER

14.3.1.20

0.001

16.92

5

PIR_SUPERFAMILY

PIRSF001191:Matrix metalloproteinase, stromelysin type

0.01

5.34

INTERPRO

IPR002477:Peptidoglycan binding-like

0.02

4.92

PANTHER_FAMILY

PTHR10201:Matrix metalloproteinase

0.02

4.43

INTERPRO

IPR000585:Hemopexin

0.03

4.10

INTERPRO

IPR006026:Peptidase, metallopeptidases

0.04

3.79

GOTERM_BP_ALL

GO:0000270~Peptidoglycan metabolic process

0.05

3.54

6

INTERPRO

IPR001314:Peptidase S1A, chymotrypsin

0.02

2.28

INTERPRO

IPR001254:Peptidase S1 and S6, chymotrypsin/Hap

0.04

2.10

PANTHER_FAMILY

PTHR19355:Serine protease-related

0.04

2.10

7

INTERPRO

IPR001039:MHC class I, alpha chain, alpha1 and alpha 2

0.02

4.69

PANTHER_FAMILY

PTHR16675:MHC class 1-related

0.03

4.08

INTERPRO

IPR011161:MHC classi-like antigen recognition

0.04

9.94

GOTERM_CC_ALL

GO:0042612~MHC class I protein complex

0.04

3.91

8

INTERPRO

IPR010579:MHC class I, alpha chain, C-terminal

0.01

14.77

PFAM

PF06623:MHC_I_C

0.01

14.63

Gene set enrichment analysis

To examine the biological pathways enriched in the data set in an unbiased, systematic method, GSEA was performed [36]. This software examines gene expression data at the level of gene sets, which are based on existing biological pathway or co-expression data from published research within the Molecular Signature Database. GSEA results were also applied to Enrichment Map in Cytoscape to generate a large network of enriched gene sets, then the large network was clustered using MCODE to generate five sub-networks of interrelated gene sets (Figure 2). The largest cluster included several signaling pathways, most notably extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 5 (ERK5), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), epidermal growth factor (EGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), MET proto-oncogene and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) pathways. Relevant to our other analyses, clusters containing gene sets involved in mitochondrial metabolism and fatty acid metabolic processes were also identified (gene lists provided in Additional file 3). More detailed description of these gene sets can be found in the MsigDB database [36].
Figure 2
Figure 2

Enrichment map of gene set enrichment analysis. The map shows enriched gene sets in 2008 versus 2008-Ets1 ovarian cancer cells clustered by MCODE to generate sub-networks of the interrelated gene sets. Red nodes indicate enrichment (upregulation) in 2008 cells, green nodes represent enrichment (upregulation) in 2008-Ets1 cells. Node size is representative of the number of enriched genes in the gene set. The largest cluster includes the signaling pathways of ERK5, MAPK, EGF, PDGF, MET and GPCR. Notably, clusters with gene sets involved in mitochondrial metabolism and fatty acid metabolic processes were also identified. Network was generated in Cytoscape.

Comparison of bioinformatic data

Pathway analysis of microarray data is a powerful tool for the identification of the underlying biological significance of a large gene expression lists, allowing for improved understanding of high-throughput data. There exist three distinct methods for conducting pathway analyses, including over-representation analysis, functional class scoring and pathway topology analysis. Each approach generates a list of significantly enriched pathways present within the input gene list, however there are limitations and advantages to each of these methods as reviewed by Khatri et al.[45]. For this study, we chose to analyze our gene expression data using each of these approaches, and then compared the results to determine the most important pathway associations present following Ets-1 overexpression in 2008 ovarian cancer cells. Oxidoreductase activity was a common pathway association between DAVID (over-representation analysis) and GSEA (functional class scoring) methods, whereas antigen presentation was enriched in both GSEA (functional class scoring) and Reactome (pathway topology analysis) analyses (Figure 3). Interestingly, metabolic pathway associations were found using all analysis methods, suggesting that this observation is the most significant finding within our Ets-1 overexpression model of ovarian cancer.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Integrating various bioinformatic analyses. Venn diagram representing the overlapping enrichments from the various bioinformatic pathway analyses (Figures 1 and 2, Table 1) employed on the microarray expression data. The functional interaction network and ontological analyses both included enrichments in antigen presentation, and the ontological analysis shared oxidoreductase activity enrichment with the gene set enrichment analysis. All three analyses found enrichments in various metabolic pathways.

Ets-1 overexpression affects oxidative stress in cancer cells

Because enrichments in various metabolic pathways and oxidoreductase activity were observed in each of the bioinformatic analyses we examined (Figure 3), we investigated the association between oxidative stress and Ets-1 expression. The upregulation of GPX-1 and GPX-2 was validated via western blot, where the protein expression of both factors was increased in response to Ets-1 induction by 3.10-fold and 2.25-fold respectively (Figure 4A). Functionally, intracellular ROS levels were significantly lower in 2008-Ets1 cells (1233.99 AFU) compared to 2008 cells (1872.73 AFU) (Figure 4B). The activity of GPX enzymes was significantly higher in 2008-Ets1 cells (7725.66 U/mL/mg) than in 2008 cells (3944.22 U/mL/mg) (Figure 4C).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Ets-1 regulated oxidative stress in ovarian cancer cells. (A) The protein expression of Ets1, GPX-1 and GPX-2 were examined via western blot, and normalized to Actin expression by densitometry analysis. Ets-1 overexpressing cells show 3.10-fold and 2.25-fold inductions in GPX-1 and GPX-2 protein levels, respectively. (B) Intracellular ROS levels were measured using the fluorescent CM2-H2DCFDA reagent in ovarian cancer cells. 2008-Ets1 cells contained lower ROS levels than 2008 cells (1233.99 AFU and 1872.73 AFU, respectively). (C) The activity of glutathione peroxidase enzymes was measured using a colorimetric assay, where Ets-1 overexpressing cells were observed to have significantly higher activity than parental cells (7725.66 U/mL/mg and 3944.22 U/mL/mg, respectively).

Breast cancer cell metabolism is regulated by Ets-1

As we have previously shown that Ets-1 regulates energy metabolism in ovarian cancer cells, for this study we endeavored to extend those findings to breast cancer cells. The Ets-1 knockdown cell line MDA-Ets1KD was generated, because the aggressive MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line expresses Ets-1 in abundance, where Ets-1 expression is decreased to 22.7% of parental levels (Figure 5A). To determine whether this cell model expressed the same differences in metabolic genes as we observed in our previous microarray analysis [32], we performed real-time qRT-PCR on the breast cancer cell model. The gene expression of PDHA, CYC1, NDUFAB1 and SDHB were increased in MDA-Ets1KD cells, whereas the expression of G6PD was downregulated (Figure 5B). The inverse relationship observed between the expression levels of these genes in our ovarian and breast cancer cell models suggest that Ets-1 regulates the expression of these factors in a similar manner in breast cancer cells.
Figure 5
Figure 5

Breast cancer cell model of Ets-1 expression knockdown. MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were stably depleted of Ets-1 expression via targeted shRNA knockdown. (A) The Ets-1 knockdown cell line MDA-Ets1KD expresses Ets-1 protein at 22.7% of parental protein levels in MDA-MB-231 cells. (B) Real-time qRT-PCR of the breast cancer Ets-1 expression model. The gene expression of PDHA, CYC1, NDUFAB1 and SDHB were increased in MDA-Ets1KD cells, whereas the expression of G6PD was downregulated.

To examine the functional consequences of decreased Ets-1 expression in breast cancer cells, we examined glycolytic dependence and oxygen consumption in MDA-Ets1KD cells. Cells were treated with various amounts of the glycolytic inhibitor 2-DG, and representative growth curves were generated for each cell line. When inhibited with 2-DG, the growth of MDA-Ets1KD cells was decreased to a lesser extent than that of MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 6A). The dose at which 50% of cells had stopped proliferating, or 2-DG IC50, was greater in MDA-Ets1KD cells with an IC50 of 3.94 mM compared to an IC50 of 2.03 mM for MDA-MB-231 cells. Basal oxygen consumption was measured using high-resolution respirometry, and MDA-Est1KD cells were observed to consume significantly more oxygen (41.80 pmol/106 cells/s) than parental MDA-MB-231 cells (21.07 pmol/106 cells/s) (Figure 6B).
Figure 6
Figure 6

Effect of Ets-1 knockdown on breast cancer cell metabolism. (A) MDA-MB-231 and MDA-Ets1KD cells were treated with various amounts of the glycolytic inhibitor 2-DG, and representative growth curves were generated for each cell line. The 2-DG IC50 was greater in MDA-Ets1KD cells, with an IC50 of 3.94 mM compared to an IC50 of 2.03 mM for MDA-MB-231 cells. (B) Basal oxygen consumption was measured using high-resolution respirometry, and MDA-Est1KD cells were observed to consume significantly more oxygen (41.80 pmol/106 cells/s) than parental MDA-MB-231 cells (21.07 pmol/106 cells/s).

Discussion

Our analysis shows that the expression of Ets-1 in cancer cells results in a transcriptional program that confers enhanced cancer progression and development through the alteration of metabolism and redox status. Ets-1 is widely expressed by tumor cells, endothelial cells and tumor-associated fibroblasts, where it is known to contribute to tumor angiogenesis and cancer cell invasion [20, 29, 30, 46–64]. Ets transcription factors are increasingly associated with such interactions between tumor and stromal cells, particularly in the context of extracellular matrix remodeling. Numerous Ets proteins are aberrantly expressed in both tumor and stromal cells, resulting in the overexpression of tumor-promoting factors such as matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, MMP-3, MMP-9, urokinase plasminogen activator (PLAU/uPA), vascular endothelial growth factor and endothelium-specific tyrosine kinase 2 [3, 30, 31, 47–50, 55, 61, 65]. The functional interaction analyses in this study further strengthen the importance of Ets-1 in regulating cancer metastasis due to the pathway associations we have observed in WNT, vascular endothelial growth factor, and MMP signaling, as well as ERK5, MAPK, EGF, PDGF, MET and GPCR pathways.

We have previously shown that our Ets-1 ovarian cancer expression model results in changes to cellular metabolism, particularly in the context of glucose utilization and oxygen consumption [32]. Several genes involved in glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway and other glycolysis feeder pathways were increased following the overexpression of Ets-1, while key enzymes in the oxidative phosphorylation pathway and the electron transport chain were repressed. Functionally, these cells are unable to grow effectively when glucose is depleted or blocked, suggesting that Ets-1 expression results in a greater reliance on glycolysis for energy generation. In accordance with these results, cellular oxygen consumption was significantly decreased in cancer cells expressing Ets-1, suggesting that electrons are passing through the electron transport chain and generating ROS at a decreased rate. In this study, we were able to repeat these findings in a breast cancer Ets-1 knockdown model, giving more strength to our theory that Ets-1 is integral in regulating cancer cell metabolism. In further support of this role, each of the different pathway analysis approaches used identified enrichments in metabolic pathways, as represented in Figure 3.

Cancer cells display enhanced anabolic nutrient processing, leading to increased rates of protein, nucleic acid and lipid biosynthesis and metabolism. Fatty acid metabolism affects several important pathways involved in cancer progression including cellular signaling and energy processing [66]. The bioinformatics analyses employed here showed enrichments in various fatty acid metabolic pathways, particularly relating to fatty acid desaturation. Fatty acid desaturation by the delta-5 and delta-6 desaturases upregulated by Ets-1 in this study, fatty acid desaturase-1 and −2, result in the production of arachidonic acid, which is associated with breast cancer progression, metastasis and angiogenesis [67–69]. The metabolism of arachidonic acid by lipoxygenases and cyclooxygenases leads to increased ROS production, likely through the stimulation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-oxidases, leading to the activation of the MAPK pathway, which in turn leads to increased cell proliferation [70]. Though we have not validated this association functionally, the upregulation of fatty acid desaturation by Ets-1 represents another potential mechanism by which this transcription factor enhances cancer progression, and warrants further investigation.

An inevitable consequence of cellular metabolism is the production of ROS, an effect that is amplified in cancer cells due to their altered metabolism, in addition to mitochondrial dysfunction and alterations in antioxidant pathways [16]. As a result of elevated levels of ROS, cancer cells are under high amounts of oxidative stress, leading to enhanced tumor progression. As a signaling molecule, ROS can activate several proliferative signaling pathways including MAPK/ERK, PI3K/Akt and NF-κB [16]. Thus, ROS encourage cancer proliferation, metastasis and angiogenesis, while also inducing apoptosis when left unchecked by cellular antioxidant systems. The pathway analyses in this study have shown common enrichment in metabolic and oxidoreductase pathways in response to Ets-1 overexpression in ovarian cancer cells. These pathways are all important in regulating oxidative stress and cellular redox state, thus it is not surprising that we also observed decreased ROS levels and increased GPX activity in Ets-1 overexpressing cancer cells. GPXs are integral to the control of H2O2 in cells, and as such have dual pro- and anti-carcinogenic roles depending on the stage of tumor development.

Cancer initiation is facilitated by low levels of GPX enzymes leading to the failure to protect against DNA damage, resulting in genomic instability [71]. In established tumors, loss of GPX activity may promote proliferation and metastasis by allowing the ROS-mediated activation of associated signaling pathways. However, high levels of GPX activity would prevent cellular oxidative damage due to excessive ROS levels leading to improved cancer cell survival through the inhibition of ROS-induced apoptosis. In this study, we have observed the upregulation of GPX1 and 2 protein expression, increased GPX enzyme activity, and decreased intracellular ROS in response to Ets-1 overexpression in ovarian cancer cells. In addition to being relevant to cell apoptosis, the upregulation of GPX1 is also associated with chemotherapeutic resistance in breast cancer [72, 73]. GPX2 overexpression is associated with increased cancer cell proliferation through WNT signaling, resistance to apoptosis by reducing ROS, and enhanced growth in breast and intestinal cancers [74–77]. These findings suggest that Ets-1 is important in regulating cellular ROS levels, and thereby regulating cellular redox status and the response to oxidative stress in cancer cells. In further support of this theory, our laboratory has previously shown that Ets-1 transcription can be induced by nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) in 2008 ovarian cancer cells [78]. As a master regulator of redox state, Nrf2 initiates key antioxidant pathways to defend against oxidative stress. Notably, this factor is also increased in many types of cancer, and mutations that confer permanent stabilization of Nrf2 are frequently observed [79]. Considering the findings presented in this study, it is possible that Nrf2-mediated induction of Ets-1 is central to the regulation of antioxidant capacity in cancer cells, and thus this may be a promising focus for future studies.

Conclusions

In this study we have identified some novel pathway associations for Ets-1 transcriptional control, though further study is required to confirm the nature of the gene interactions therein. Interestingly, we have found that several enriched metabolic and oxidative stress pathways are differentially expressed in an ovarian cancer cell model of Ets-1 overexpression. The study of cancer metabolism is a rapidly emerging field in the context of cancer research, though the groundwork for this research was built almost half a century ago [80]. One of the main byproducts of metabolism is ROS, which are produced in excess in cancer cells due to high metabolic rates and mitochondrial dysfunction. We have previously shown that Ets-1 is transcriptionally activated by H2O2 in ovarian cancer cells via Nrf2 antioxidant response element binding within the Ets-1 promoter [78]. Aggressive cancer cells are often chronically exposed to high levels of oxidative stress, which could explain why Ets-1 is commonly upregulated in these cancers. Therefore, we suggest that increased levels of ROS produced from cancer cells result in the induction of Nrf2 and subsequently Ets-1, which is then involved in a largely undefined transcriptional network that confers metabolic reliance on glycolysis and fat metabolism to fulfill the cancer cell’s high energy needs. As ROS have such integral roles in cancer progression, an intimate understanding of the underlying mechanisms that achieve elevated levels of ROS will open the door to novel molecular avenues for drug development.

Abbreviations

2-DG: 

2-Deoxy-D-glucose

AFU: 

Arbitrary fluorescent units

EGF: 

Epidermal growth factor

ERK: 

Extracellular-signal-regulated kinase

Ets: 

E-26

FDR: 

False discovery rate

FI: 

Function interaction

GPCR: 

G protein-coupled receptor

GPX: 

Glutathione peroxidases

GSEA: 

Gene set enrichment analysis

IC50: 

Dose at which 50% of cells stop proliferating

MAPK: 

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

MMP: 

Matrix metalloproteinase

Nrf2: 

Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2

PDGF: 

Platelet-derived growth factor

qRT-PCR: 

Quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction

ROS: 

Reactive oxygen species

WNT: 

Wingless-type.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grant funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). We thank Leigh Wilson and Darren Hamerlick for their excellent technical assistance in generating stable cell lines, glycolytic dependency assays, and oxygen consumption assays.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Science, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street W, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5, Canada
(2)
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street W, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5, Canada
(3)
Juravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession Street, Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2, Canada

References

  1. Leprince D, Gegonne A, Coll J, de Taisne C, Schneeberger A, Lagrou C, Stehelin D: A putative second cell-derived oncogene of the avian leukaemia retrovirus E26. Nature. 1983, 306 (5941): 395-397. 10.1038/306395a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Oikawa T, Yamada T: Molecular biology of the Ets family of transcription factors. Gene. 2003, 303: 11-34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Seth A, Watson DK: ETS transcription factors and their emerging roles in human cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2005, 41 (16): 2462-2478. 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.08.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldus CD, Liyanarachchi S, Mrozek K, Auer H, Tanner SM, Guimond M, Ruppert AS, Mohamed N, Davuluri RV, Caligiuri MA, Bloomfield CD, de la Chapelle A: Acute myeloid leukemia with complex karyotypes and abnormal chromosome 21: Amplification discloses overexpression of APP, ETS2, and ERG genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101 (11): 3915-3920. 10.1073/pnas.0400272101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Foos G, Garcia-Ramirez JJ, Galang CK, Hauser CA: Elevated expression of Ets2 or distinct portions of Ets2 can reverse Ras-mediated cellular transformation. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273 (30): 18871-18880. 10.1074/jbc.273.30.18871.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Foos G, Hauser CA: Altered Ets transcription factor activity in prostate tumor cells inhibits anchorage-independent growth, survival, and invasiveness. Oncogene. 2000, 19 (48): 5507-5516. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203946.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Santoro A, Maggio A, Carbone P, Mirto S, Caronia F, Acuto S: Amplification of ETS2 oncogene in acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia with t(6;21;18). Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1992, 58 (1): 71-75. 10.1016/0165-4608(92)90137-W.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sapi E, Flick MB, Rodov S, Kacinski BM: Ets-2 transdominant mutant abolishes anchorage-independent growth and macrophage colony-stimulating factor-stimulated invasion by BT20 breast carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 1998, 58 (5): 1027-1033.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sementchenko VI, Schweinfest CW, Papas TS, Watson DK: ETS2 function is required to maintain the transformed state of human prostate cancer cells. Oncogene. 1998, 17 (22): 2883-2888. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202220.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Poppe B, Vandesompele J, Schoch C, Lindvall C, Mrozek K, Bloomfield CD, Beverloo HB, Michaux L, Dastugue N, Herens C, Yigit N, De Paepe A, Hagemeijer A, Speleman F: Expression analyses identify MLL as a prominent target of 11q23 amplification and support an etiologic role for MLL gain of function in myeloid malignancies. Blood. 2004, 103 (1): 229-235. 10.1182/blood-2003-06-2163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kurpios NA, Sabolic NA, Shepherd TG, Fidalgo GM, Hassell JA: Function of PEA3 Ets transcription factors in mammary gland development and oncogenesis. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2003, 8 (2): 177-190. 10.1023/A:1025948823955.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Shepherd TG, Kockeritz L, Szrajber MR, Muller WJ, Hassell JA: The pea3 subfamily ets genes are required for HER2/Neu-mediated mammary oncogenesis. Curr Biol. 2001, 11 (22): 1739-1748. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00536-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghadersohi A, Sood AK: Prostate epithelium-derived Ets transcription factor mRNA is overexpressed in human breast tumors and is a candidate breast tumor marker and a breast tumor antigen. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7 (9): 2731-2738.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dittmer J: The biology of the Ets1 proto-oncogene. Mol Cancer. 2003, 2: 29-10.1186/1476-4598-2-29.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Graves BJ, Petersen JM: Specificity within the ets family of transcription factors. Adv Cancer Res. 1998, 75: 1-55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Verschoor ML, Wilson LA, Singh G: Mechanisms associated with mitochondrial-generated reactive oxygen species in cancer. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2010, 88 (3): 204-219. 10.1139/Y09-135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Buggy Y, Maguire TM, McGreal G, McDermott E, Hill AD, O’Higgins N, Duffy MJ: Overexpression of the Ets-1 transcription factor in human breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004, 91 (7): 1308-1315. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602128.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Davidson B, Reich R, Goldberg I, Gotlieb WH, Kopolovic J, Berner A, Ben-Baruch G, Bryne M, Nesland JM: Ets-1 messenger RNA expression is a novel marker of poor survival in ovarian carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7 (3): 551-557.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Davidson B, Risberg B, Goldberg I, Nesland JM, Berner A, Trope CG, Kristensen GB, Bryne M, Reich R: Ets-1 mRNA expression in effusions of serous ovarian carcinoma patients is a marker of poor outcome. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001, 25 (12): 1493-1500. 10.1097/00000478-200112000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fujimoto J, Aoki I, Toyoki H, Khatun S, Sato E, Sakaguchi H, Tamaya T: Clinical implications of expression of ETS-1 related to angiogenesis in metastatic lesions of ovarian cancers. Oncology. 2004, 66 (5): 420-428. 10.1159/000079491.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Katayama S, Nakayama T, Ito M, Naito S, Sekine I: Expression of the ets-1 proto-oncogene in human breast carcinoma: differential expression with histological grading and growth pattern. Histol Histopathol. 2005, 20 (1): 119-126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Span PN, Manders P, Heuvel JJ, Thomas CM, Bosch RR, Beex LV, Sweep CG: Expression of the transcription factor Ets-1 is an independent prognostic marker for relapse-free survival in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2002, 21 (55): 8506-8509. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Alipov G, Nakayama T, Ito M, Kawai K, Naito S, Nakashima M, Niino D, Sekine I: Overexpression of Ets-1 proto-oncogene in latent and clinical prostatic carcinomas. Histopathology. 2005, 46 (2): 202-208. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02059.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chang XZ, Yu J, Zhang XH, Yin J, Wang T, Cao XC: Enhanced expression of trophinin promotes invasive and metastatic potential of human gallbladder cancer cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009, 135 (4): 581-590. 10.1007/s00432-008-0492-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sasaki H, Yukiue H, Moiriyama S, Kobayashi Y, Nakashima Y, Kaji M, Kiriyama M, Fukai I, Yamakawa Y, Fujii Y: Clinical significance of matrix metalloproteinase-7 and Ets-1 gene expression in patients with lung cancer. J Surg Res. 2001, 101 (2): 242-247. 10.1006/jsre.2001.6279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Saeki H, Oda S, Kawaguchi H, Ohno S, Kuwano H, Maehara Y, Sugimachi K: Concurrent overexpression of Ets-1 and c-Met correlates with a phenotype of high cellular motility in human esophageal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2002, 98 (1): 8-13. 10.1002/ijc.10163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ghosh S, Basu M, Roy SS: ETS-1 protein regulates vascular endothelial growth factor-induced matrix metalloproteinase-9 and matrix metalloproteinase-13 expression in human ovarian carcinoma cell line SKOV-3. J Biol Chem. 2012, 287 (18): 15001-15015. 10.1074/jbc.M111.284034.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin Z, Liu Y, Sun Y, He X: Expression of Ets-1, Ang-2 and maspin in ovarian cancer and their role in tumor angiogenesis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2011, 30: 31-10.1186/1756-9966-30-31.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Okuducu AF, Zils U, Michaelis SA, Michaelides S, von Deimling A: Ets-1 is up-regulated together with its target gene products matrix metalloproteinase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in atypical and anaplastic meningiomas. Histopathology. 2006, 48 (7): 836-845. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02432.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Park YH, Jung HH, Ahn JS, Im YH: Ets-1 upregulates HER2-induced MMP-1 expression in breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008, 377 (2): 389-394. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.09.135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sementchenko VI, Watson DK: Ets target genes: past, present and future. Oncogene. 2000, 19 (55): 6533-6548. 10.1038/sj.onc.1204034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Verschoor ML, Wilson LA, Verschoor CP, Singh G: Ets-1 regulates energy metabolism in cancer cells. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (10): e13565-10.1371/journal.pone.0013565.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang Y, Yan LX, Wu QN, Du ZM, Chen J, Liao DZ, Huang MY, Hou JH, Wu QL, Zeng MS, Huang WL, Zeng YX, Shao JY: miR-125b is methylated and functions as a tumor suppressor by regulating the ETS1 proto-oncogene in human invasive breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2011, 71 (10): 3552-3562. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2435.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Andrews PA, Albright KD: Mitochondrial defects in cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)-resistant human ovarian carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 1992, 52 (7): 1895-1901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. da Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA: Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009, 4 (1): 44-57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, Mesirov JP: Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102 (43): 15545-15550. 10.1073/pnas.0506580102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, Lehar J, Puigserver P, Carlsson E, Ridderstrale M, Laurila E, Houstis N, Daly MJ, Patterson N, Mesirov JP, Golub TR, Tamayo P, Spiegelman B, Lander ES, Hirschhorn JN, Altshuler D, Groop LC: PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 2003, 34 (3): 267-273. 10.1038/ng1180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Ideker T: Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics. 2011, 27 (3): 431-432. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq675.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Assenov Y, Ramirez F, Schelhorn SE, Lengauer T, Albrecht M: Computing topological parameters of biological networks. Bioinformatics. 2008, 24 (2): 282-284. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm554.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wu G, Feng X, Stein L: A human functional protein interaction network and its application to cancer data analysis. Genome Biol. 2010, 11 (5): R53-10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-r53.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Merico D, Isserlin R, Stueker O, Emili A, Bader GD: Enrichment map: a network-based method for gene-set enrichment visualization and interpretation. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (11): e13984-10.1371/journal.pone.0013984.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Bader GD, Hogue CW: An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003, 4: 2-10.1186/1471-2105-4-2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW: NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012, 9 (7): 671-675. 10.1038/nmeth.2089.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilson LA, Yamamoto H, Singh G: Role of the transcription factor Ets-1 in cisplatin resistance. Mol Cancer Ther. 2004, 3 (7): 823-832.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Khatri P, Sirota M, Butte AJ: Ten years of pathway analysis: current approaches and outstanding challenges. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012, 8 (2): e1002375-10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002375.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Adam M, Schmidt D, Wardelmann E, Wernert N, Albers P: Angiogenetic protooncogene ets-1 induced neovascularization is involved in the metastatic process of testicular germ cell tumors. Eur Urol. 2003, 44 (3): 329-336. 10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00262-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Behrens P, Mathiak M, Mangold E, Kirdorf S, Wellmann A, Fogt F, Rothe M, Florin A, Wernert N: Stromal expression of invasion-promoting, matrix-degrading proteases MMP-1 and −9 and the Ets 1 transcription factor in HNPCC carcinomas and sporadic colorectal cancers. Int J Cancer. 2003, 107 (2): 183-188. 10.1002/ijc.11336.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Behrens P, Rothe M, Wellmann A, Krischler J, Wernert N: The Ets-1 transcription factor is up-regulated together with MMP 1 and MMP 9 in the stroma of pre-invasive breast cancer. J Pathol. 2001, 194 (1): 43-50. 10.1002/path.844.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Bolon I, Gouyer V, Devouassoux M, Vandenbunder B, Wernert N, Moro D, Brambilla C, Brambilla E: Expression of c-ets-1, collagenase 1, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator genes in lung carcinomas. Am J Pathol. 1995, 147 (5): 1298-1310.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Hahne JC, Fuchs T, El Mustapha H, Okuducu AF, Bories JC, Wernert N: Expression pattern of matrix metalloproteinase and TIMP genes in fibroblasts derived from Ets-1 knock-out mice compared to wild-type mouse fibroblasts. Int J Mol Med. 2006, 18 (1): 153-159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Hahne JC, Okuducu AF, Kaminski A, Florin A, Soncin F, Wernert N: Ets-1 expression promotes epithelial cell transformation by inducing migration, invasion and anchorage-independent growth. Oncogene. 2005, 24 (34): 5384-5388. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208761.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Hahne JC, Okuducu AF, Sahin A, Fafeur V, Kiriakidis S, Wernert N: The transcription factor ETS-1: its role in tumour development and strategies for its inhibition. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2008, 8 (11): 1095-1105. 10.2174/138955708785909934.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Khatun S, Fujimoto J, Toyoki H, Tamaya T: Clinical implications of expression of ETS-1 in relation to angiogenesis in ovarian cancers. Cancer Sci. 2003, 94 (9): 769-773. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01517.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lefter LP, Dima S, Sunamura M, Furukawa T, Sato Y, Abe M, Chivu M, Popescu I, Horii A: Transcriptional silencing of ETS-1 efficiently suppresses angiogenesis of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Gene Ther. 2009, 16 (2): 137-148. 10.1038/cgt.2008.65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Nakada M, Yamashita J, Okada Y, Sato H: Ets-1 positively regulates expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and invasiveness of astrocytic tumors. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1999, 58 (4): 329-334. 10.1097/00005072-199904000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Rothhammer T, Hahne JC, Florin A, Poser I, Soncin F, Wernert N, Bosserhoff AK: The Ets-1 transcription factor is involved in the development and invasion of malignant melanoma. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004, 61 (1): 118-128. 10.1007/s00018-003-3337-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sahin A, Velten M, Pietsch T, Knuefermann P, Okuducu AF, Hahne JC, Wernert N: Inactivation of Ets 1 transcription factor by a specific decoy strategy reduces rat C6 glioma cell proliferation and mmp-9 expression. Int J Mol Med. 2005, 15 (5): 771-776.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Sahin A, Vercamer C, Kaminski A, Fuchs T, Florin A, Hahne JC, Mattot V, Pourtier-Manzanedo A, Pietsch T, Fafeur V, Wernert N: Dominant-negative inhibition of Ets 1 suppresses tumor growth, invasion and migration in rat C6 glioma cells and reveals differentially expressed Ets 1 target genes. Int J Oncol. 2009, 34 (2): 377-389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Sakaguchi H, Fujimoto J, Aoki I, Toyoki H, Sato E, Tamaya T: Expression of E26 transformation specific (ETS-1) related to angiogenesis in ovarian endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2004, 82 (2): 507-510. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.02.103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Shimizu S, Kageyama M, Yasuda M, Sasaki D, Naito S, Yamamoto T, Kiuchi Y: Stimulation of in vitro angiogenesis by nitric oxide through the induction of transcription factor ETS-1. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004, 36 (1): 114-122. 10.1016/S1357-2725(03)00170-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Watabe T, Yoshida K, Shindoh M, Kaya M, Fujikawa K, Sato H, Seiki M, Ishii S, Fujinaga K: The Ets-1 and Ets-2 transcription factors activate the promoters for invasion-associated urokinase and collagenase genes in response to epidermal growth factor. Int J Cancer. 1998, 77 (1): 128-137. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980703)77:1<128::AID-IJC20>3.0.CO;2-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Wernert N, Stanjek A, Kiriakidis S, Hugel A, Jha HC, Mazitschek R, Giannis A: Inhibition of angiogenesis in vivo by ets-1 antisense oligonucleotides-inhibition of Ets-1 transcription factor expression by the antibiotic fumagillin. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1999, 38 (21): 3228-3231. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19991102)38:21<3228::AID-ANIE3228>3.0.CO;2-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Yasuda M, Ohzeki Y, Shimizu S, Naito S, Ohtsuru A, Yamamoto T, Kuroiwa Y: Stimulation of in vitro angiogenesis by hydrogen peroxide and the relation with ETS-1 in endothelial cells. Life Sci. 1999, 64 (4): 249-258.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhan Y, Brown C, Maynard E, Anshelevich A, Ni W, Ho IC, Oettgen P: Ets-1 is a critical regulator of Ang II-mediated vascular inflammation and remodeling. J Clin Invest. 2005, 115 (9): 2508-2516. 10.1172/JCI24403.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Oda N, Abe M, Sato Y: ETS-1 converts endothelial cells to the angiogenic phenotype by inducing the expression of matrix metalloproteinases and integrin beta3. J Cell Physiol. 1999, 178 (2): 121-132. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199902)178:2<121::AID-JCP1>3.0.CO;2-F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Liu Y: Fatty acid oxidation is a dominant bioenergetic pathway in prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2006, 9 (3): 230-234. 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500879.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Martinez-Orozco R, Navarro-Tito N, Soto-Guzman A, Castro-Sanchez L, Perez Salazar E: Arachidonic acid promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal-like transition in mammary epithelial cells MCF10A. Eur J Cell Biol. 2010, 89 (6): 476-488. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2009.12.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Chang NW, Wu CT, Chen DR, Yeh CY, Lin C: High levels of arachidonic acid and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha in breast cancer tissues are associated with promoting cancer cell proliferation. J Nutr Biochem. 2013, 24 (1): 274-281. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2012.06.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wen ZH, Su YC, Lai PL, Zhang Y, Xu YF, Zhao A, Yao GY, Jia CH, Lin J, Xu S, Wang L, Wang XK, Liu AL, Jiang Y, Dai YF, Bai XC: Critical role of arachidonic acid-activated mTOR signaling in breast carcinogenesis and angiogenesis. Oncogene. 2013, 32 (2): 160-170. 10.1038/onc.2012.47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Cho KJ, Seo JM, Kim JH: Bioactive lipoxygenase metabolites stimulation of NADPH oxidases and reactive oxygen species. Mol Cells. 2011, 32 (1): 1-5. 10.1007/s10059-011-1021-7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Brigelius-Flohe R, Kipp A: Glutathione peroxidases in different stages of carcinogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009, 1790 (11): 1555-1568. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.03.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Gouaze V, Mirault ME, Carpentier S, Salvayre R, Levade T, Andrieu-Abadie N: Glutathione peroxidase-1 overexpression prevents ceramide production and partially inhibits apoptosis in doxorubicin-treated human breast carcinoma cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2001, 60 (3): 488-496.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Vibet S, Goupille C, Bougnoux P, Steghens JP, Gore J, Maheo K: Sensitization by docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) of breast cancer cells to anthracyclines through loss of glutathione peroxidase (GPx1) response. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008, 44 (7): 1483-1491. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.01.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Yan W, Chen X: GPX2, a direct target of p63, inhibits oxidative stress-induced apoptosis in a p53-dependent manner. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281 (12): 7856-7862. 10.1074/jbc.M512655200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Naiki-Ito A, Asamoto M, Hokaiwado N, Takahashi S, Yamashita H, Tsuda H, Ogawa K, Shirai T: Gpx2 is an overexpressed gene in rat breast cancers induced by three different chemical carcinogens. Cancer Res. 2007, 67 (23): 11353-11358. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2226.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Chu FF, Esworthy RS, Chu PG, Longmate JA, Huycke MM, Wilczynski S, Doroshow JH: Bacteria-induced intestinal cancer in mice with disrupted Gpx1 and Gpx2 genes. Cancer Res. 2004, 64 (3): 962-968. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-2272.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Banning A, Kipp A, Schmitmeier S, Lowinger M, Florian S, Krehl S, Thalmann S, Thierbach R, Steinberg P, Brigelius-Flohe R: Glutathione peroxidase 2 inhibits cyclooxygenase-2-mediated migration and invasion of HT-29 adenocarcinoma cells but supports their growth as tumors in nude mice. Cancer Res. 2008, 68 (23): 9746-9753. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1321.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Wilson LA, Gemin A, Espiritu R, Singh G: ets-1 is transcriptionally up-regulated by H2O2 via an antioxidant response element. FASEB J. 2005, 19 (14): 2085-2087.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Hayes JD, McMahon M: NRF2 and KEAP1 mutations: permanent activation of an adaptive response in cancer. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009, 34 (4): 176-188. 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.12.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Warburg O: On the origin of cancer cells. Science. 1956, 123 (3191): 309-314. 10.1126/science.123.3191.309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Verschoor et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

Cancer & Metabolism

ISSN: 2049-3002