Research
Open Access

Respiratory complex I is essential to induce a Warburg profile in mitochondria-defective tumor cells

  • Claudia Calabrese1,
  • Luisa Iommarini2,
  • Ivana Kurelac1,
  • Maria Antonietta Calvaruso2,
  • Mariantonietta Capristo2,
  • Pier-Luigi Lollini3,
  • Patrizia Nanni3,
  • Christian Bergamini2,
  • Giordano Nicoletti4,
  • Carla De Giovanni3,
  • Anna Ghelli2,
  • Valentina Giorgio5,
  • Mariano Francesco Caratozzolo6,
  • Flaviana Marzano6,
  • Caterina Manzari7,
  • Christine M Betts3,
  • Valerio Carelli8,
  • Claudio Ceccarelli9,
  • Marcella Attimonelli7,
  • Giovanni Romeo1,
  • Romana Fato2,
  • Michela Rugolo2,
  • Apollonia Tullo6,
  • Giuseppe Gasparre1Email author and
  • Anna Maria Porcelli2, 10Email author
Cancer & Metabolism20131:11

https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-3002-1-11

©  Calabrese et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

Received: 5 November 2012

Accepted: 27 February 2013

Published: 18 March 2013

Abstract

Background

Aerobic glycolysis, namely the Warburg effect, is the main hallmark of cancer cells. Mitochondrial respiratory dysfunction has been proposed to be one of the major causes for such glycolytic shift. This hypothesis has been revisited as tumors appear to undergo waves of gene regulation during progression, some of which rely on functional mitochondria. In this framework, the role of mitochondrial complex I is still debated, in particular with respect to the effect of mitochondrial DNA mutations in cancer metabolism. The aim of this work is to provide the proof of concept that functional complex I is necessary to sustain tumor progression.

Methods

Complex I-null osteosarcoma cells were complemented with allotopically expressed complex I subunit 1 (MT-ND1). Complex I re-assembly and function recovery, also in terms of NADH consumption, were assessed. Clones were tested for their ability to grow in soft agar and to generate tumor masses in nude mice. Hypoxia levels were evaluated via pimonidazole staining and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) immunoblotting and histochemical staining. 454-pyrosequencing was implemented to obtain global transcriptomic profiling of allotopic and non-allotopic xenografts.

Results

Complementation of a truncative mutation in the gene encoding MT-ND1, showed that a functional enzyme was required to perform the glycolytic shift during the hypoxia response and to induce a Warburg profile in vitro and in vivo, fostering cancer progression. Such trigger was mediated by HIF-1α, whose stabilization was regulated after recovery of the balance between α-ketoglutarate and succinate due to a recuperation of NADH consumption that followed complex I rescue.

Conclusion

Respiratory complex I is essential for the induction of Warburg effect and adaptation to hypoxia of cancer cells, allowing them to sustain tumor growth. Differently from other mitochondrial tumor suppressor genes, therefore, a complex I severe mutation such as the one here reported may confer anti-tumorigenic properties, highlighting the prognostic values of such genetic markers in cancer.

Keywords

Complex I mtDNA mutation HIF-1α Mitochondria Cancer Warburg effect Allotopic expression

Background

Aerobic glycolysis is one of the main hallmarks of cancer cells. The seminal observation by Otto Warburg at the beginning of last century [1, 2] has fostered compelling efforts in elucidating the profound metabolic changes that transformed cells undergo from initial tumor to the spread of metastases, which to date remain largely obscure. It is still unclear why highly proliferative and invasive cancer cells settle for an energetically less efficient aerobic glycolysis, rather than oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), which generates far more ATP from a single glucose molecule. The shift toward glycolysis has been ascribed to four potential causes, namely (i) a mitochondrial dysfunction, which forces cells to rely on glycolysis, (ii) an upregulation of glycolytic genes driven by the activation of oncogenes, (iii) the triggering of a strong hypoxic response that turns down oxygen-dependent respiration and (iv) the redirection of glucose catabolism towards macromolecular biosynthesis [3, 4].

The classical Warburg hypothesis has recently been revisited, as tumors with active mitochondrial metabolism have been identified, indicating that aerobic glycolysis does not necessarily involve a decrease in mitochondrial function [5]. It is likely that glycolytic and oxidative metabolisms interchange in a wave pattern during the proliferation and transformation of cancer cells, constantly subjected to selective pressures in terms of nutrients and oxygen availability, determined by the ever-changing tumor microenvironment [6]. In this context, mitochondria might represent the main hub for the wave-like regulation of cancer metabolism [7]. In fact, they host a number of essential metabolic processes, such as the oxygen-dependent ATP production, redox regulation and biosynthetic reactions [8]. Moreover, mitochondria are involved in the regulation of hypoxic adaptation [9], a process that must be triggered in any solid neoplasia to overcome the initial steps of tumorigenesis and is controlled by hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) [10].

During O2 deprivation, HIF-1α stabilization and activation is needed for cells to respond to hypoxia, upregulating the expression of pivotal glycolytic genes [11]. Therefore, in this condition, HIF-1α increases glycolysis and suppresses the tricarboxylic acids (TCA) cycle and, ultimately, mitochondrial respiration [12, 13]. HIF-1α stabilization is tightly controlled by prolyl-hydroxylases (PHDs), enzymes whose HIF-1α-degrading activity is allosterically regulated by α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) and succinate (SA), two key metabolites of the TCA cycle, which feeds reducing equivalents to the respiratory chain for ATP production. In this frame, we have recently shown that a dysfunction in complex I (CI), caused by the severe m.3571insC/MT-ND1 mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutation, strongly contributes to HIF-1α destabilization and lack of hypoxia adaptation, which eventually leads to an antitumorigenic effect [14, 15]. Complex I is the largest and least understood component of the respiratory chain, which catalyzes the transfer of electrons from NADH to flavin mononucleotide and then to ubiquinone [16]. The holoenzyme function is necessary for ATP production and for the maintenance of cellular redox state, such as NAD+/NADH ratio and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels [17]. Complex I dysfunction, specifically that induced by the occurrence of mutations in respiratory genes encoded within the multicopy mtDNA, has generally been described as pro-tumorigenic [18, 19]. An open debate scans the evidence that mtDNA mutations, according to their overall effect on the respiratory chain and, indirectly, on other oxidative metabolism pathways, may not behave univocally as pro-tumorigenic and pro-metastatic events [15, 20]. Mutations in CI genes encoded within the mtDNA, in fact, have been shown both to foster and inhibit the replication of tumors in which they occur, a two-sided effect that depends on the percentage of mutant mtDNA copies (heteroplasmy) and on the capacity of the mutation to disassemble CI [21]. Therefore, it is likely that CI may no longer be looked upon as an enzyme that merely contributes to mitochondrial function. Nevertheless, although its role in determining the fate of cancer cells upon deregulation of their metabolic switch during tumor progression is considered increasingly crucial, it remains ambiguous. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms through which CI may regulate metabolic adaptation in tumorigenesis still remain practically uninvestigated.

In the attempt to assign a role to CI within the Warburg effect, we have demonstrated that this mitochondrial enzyme is required in order to perform the metabolic switch towards glycolysis during the hypoxia response, a pivotal goal in the metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells.

Methods

Cell lines

In this study, 143B osteosarcoma-derived cybrids harboring the homoplasmic m.3571insC mutation in MT-ND1[HGCN:7455], their counterpart OS-93ND1, allotopically complemented with wild-type MT-ND1 and their wild-type mtDNA counterpart (CC) were used. Mock cells transfected with empty vector are indicated as OS-93. Cybrids were obtained and cultured as previously described [15].

Nucleic acid extraction

DNA from snap-frozen xenografts and cultured cells (7 × 105) was extracted with GenElute™ Mammalian Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy). RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen, Milan, Italy) was used to extract RNA from snap-frozen xenografts. Cell lines RNA was obtained using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Milan, Italy) and following manufacturer’s instructions.

MT-ND1 allotopic construct

Wild-type MT-ND1 was cloned from cDNA of TPC1 cells derived from a papillary thyroid carcinoma [22] and inserted into a p3XFLAG-CMV™-14 expression vector (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy). The MT-ND1 sequence was identical to the mtDNA revised Cambridge Reference Sequence (rCRS) [GenBank:NC_012920.1]. FLAG epitope was excluded from the transgene frame in order not to affect protein folding. COX10 [GenBank:U09466] 3′- and 5′-UTR were cloned according to Bonnet et al. [23]. The 5′-UTR from nuclear-encoded mitochondrial protein COX10 was cloned upstream of nND1 for mRNA targeting to the mitochondria outer membrane, along with mitochondrial targeting sequence (N-terminal MTS). The 3′-UTR from COX10 was inserted downstream of nND1 in order to ensure mRNA stability. Site-directed in vitro mutagenesis was performed with the QuikChange Lightning Multi Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Strategene, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Oligonucleotides designed for this purpose are available on request.

Cell transfection, selection and assessment of allotopic MT-ND1 expression

Cells were transfected with p3XFLAG-CMV™-14 empty vector and with the nND1 allotopic construct by using Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen, Milan, Italy) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Stable clones were obtained by selection with 400 μg/mL G418 (Invitrogen, Milan, Italy) and the antibiotic resistant clones were double-selected by growing them in DMEM without glucose supplemented with 5 mM galactose, 5 mM Na-pyruvate and 10% FBS, in order to eliminate false positive clones. The expression of allotopic ND1 was assessed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Total RNA was extracted from OS-93 and OS-93ND1 clones and 1 μg was used for retrotranscription with Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Monza, Italy), by using random hexameric primers. Primer and TaqMan® probes sequences were designed using Primer3 software [24] and the presence of 3′ intra-/inter-primer similarity was ruled out using IDT OligoAnalyzer tool [25]. Sequences are available upon request. Allotopic nND1 PCR product spanned the region between the COX10 MTS and 5′-nND1, in order to exclude any endogenous transcript, and the normalization was performed on pCMV levels, which is present in plasmid DNA but not translated, in order to exclude plasmid DNA contamination. Human ACTB gene[GenBank:M28424] was used as reference gene. The PCR reaction was performed with LightCycler® 480 Probes Master and run in LightCycler®480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche Diagnostics, Monza, Italy), using the following conditions: 95°C, 5 minutes; 45 cycles of 95°C, 15 sec, and 60°C, 45 sec. Absolute quantification was performed using a standard curve prepared by serial dilutions of purified p3XFLAG-CMV™-14 containing the allotopic construct.

mtDNA sequencing and low heteroplasmy detection

Whole mtDNA resequencing was performed as previously described [26] in order to verify that xenografts had not accumulated mutations apart from the m.3571insC. Mutant load of m.3571insC was determined using fluorescent PCR (F-PCR) and denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) according to previously optimized protocols for mutations in difficult sequence contexts such as homopolymers [27]. Each analysis was performed in triplicate.

SDS-PAGE

Mitochondrial enriched fraction was obtained by the subcellular fractionation in the presence of digitonine (50 μg/mL) [28]. Total lysates were prepared from 30 mg of xenografts as previously described [15]. Mitochondrial proteins (40 μg) or total xenograft and cell lysates (80 μg) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane as previously reported [15].

Western blot

Nitrocellulose membranes were incubated with antibodies against voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) (1:1000, BioVision, Mountain View, CA, USA), ND1 (1:1000, a gift from A. Lombes, Unite de Recherche INSERM 153, Hospital de la Salpetriere, Paris, France), HIF-1α (1:1000, Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX, USA), LDHA (1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy). Secondary antibodies used were peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit (1:2000, Jackson ImmunoResearch, Suffolk, England). Chemiluminescence signals were obtained with Kodak molecular imaging apparatus (Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). Coomassie staining was used as the loading control.

Complex I In-Gel-Activity (CI-IGA) assay

Mitochondrial enriched fractions (for sample preparation see section SDS-PAGE) were solubilized with n-dodecyl-maltoside (2.5 g/g protein) as previously reported [29]. Proteins (100 μg) were separated by 4 to 13% Blue Native gradient gel (BN-PAGE) and CI-IGA was detected as previously described [30].

NAD+/NADH ratio determination

Aliquotes of 1.5 × 106 cells were washed and resuspended in 1 mL of ice-cold PBS and extracted for NADH and NAD+ determination. For NADH analysis, cell suspension was treated with 0.5 M potassium hydroxide containing 50% (v/v) ethanol and 35% (w/v) cesium chloride, immediately cooled on ice, centrifuged at 4°C to remove insoluble material and the supernatant (100 μL) was injected on C18 column. For NAD+ determination, cell suspension was treated with 1 M perchloric acid, immediately cooled on ice, and centrifuged at 4°C to remove insoluble material. Perchloric acid was neutralized with potassium hydroxide and centrifuged immediately before injection. The supernatant was injected (100 μL) on C18 column. The pyridine nucleotides were extracted and detected as described [31] on a Kinetex reversed phase C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), with a two-pump Waters 510 system equipped with a variable volume injector. Absorbance at 260 nm for NAD+ and at 340 nm for NADH was monitored by a photodiode array detector (Waters 996). NADH and NAD+ peaks were identified by comparison of their retention times with those of standards and confirmed by co-elution with standards. The quantification was obtained from peak area measurement compared to standard curves.

ATP synthesis measurement

The rate of mitochondrial ATP synthesis driven by CI and CII was performed in aliquots of digitonin-permeabilized cells and normalized on citrate synthase (CS) activity as previously described [32]. Briefly, aliquots (0.1 to 0.2 mg protein) were incubated with 5 mM malate plus 5 mM pyruvate (CI substrates) or with 10 mM succinate (CII substrate) plus 2 μg/mL rotenone. The reaction was started by addition of 0.2 mM ADP in the presence of luciferine/luciferase, and chemiluminescence was evaluated as a function of time with a luminometer. After addition of 10 μM oligomycin, the chemiluminescence signal was calibrated with an internal ATP standard.

Oxygen consumption rate (OCR)

OCR in adherent cells was measured with an XF24 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, Billerica MA, USA). Cells were seeded in XF24 cell culture microplates at 3 × 104 cells/well in 200 μL of DMEM containing 4.5 g/L glucose and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 24 h. Assays were performed as previously reported [32]. Data are expressed as pmoles of O2 per minute per 3 × 104 cells.

Mitochondrial membrane potential determination

Cells (3 × 105) were seeded onto 24 mm-diameter round glass coverslips and grown for 2 days. Mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) was measured by the accumulation of tetramethylrhodamine methyl esther (TMRM) as previously reported [30]. Data were acquired and analyzed using MetaFluor software (Universal Imaging Corp., Downington, PA, USA). Clusters of several mitochondria were identified as regions of interest, and fields not containing cells were taken as background. Sequential digital images and fluorescence intensity were acquired every minute. Fluorescence values were obtained by subtracting background values from those of corresponding mitochondrial areas of interest, for each time point, and expressed as percentage of T0 (100%).

Soft agar

Anchorage-independent cell growth was determined in 0.33% agarose with a 0.5% agarose underlayer. Cell suspensions (2 × 104 cells) were plated in semisolid medium, in absence or presence of 1 μM dimethyloxallylglycine (DMOG). Colonies were counted after 7 days at a magnification of 10× with an inverted microscope (Nikon Diaphot, Nikon Instruments, Florence, Italy). Plate pictures and magnifications were obtained with a Kodak molecular imaging apparatus (Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). Effects of DMOG on HIF-1α stabilization were validated by western blotting (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The index of colony forming ability was calculated as the ratio between untreated OS-93ND1 and OS-93 cells and then used for normalization of DMOG-treated cells. The t-test was used for statistical comparison.

In vivo tumor growth analysis

Cells (3 × 106) were suspended in 0.2 mL sterile PBS and injected subcutaneously in 4 to 7 week-old athymic Crl:CD-1-Foxn1 nu/nu mice (referred to as nude mice, purchased from Charles River, Lecco, Italy). Experiments were authorized by the institutional review board of the University of Bologna and performed according to Italian and European guidelines. Individually tagged virgin female mice (10 per experimental group) were used. Tumor growth was assessed with a caliper; volume was calculated as:
Π √ a * b 3 / 6

where a = maximal tumor diameter, and b = tumor diameter perpendicular to a.

Electron microscopy

Xenograft biopsies were immediately collected and processed as previously described [15]. Samples were observed with a JEM-1011 Transmission Electron Microscope (Jeol Ltd, Milan, Italy).

cDNA library preparation and mRNA sequencing

Ultradeep pyrosequencing was performed using 454 GS FLX Titanium platform (Roche Diagnostics, Monza, Italy). RNA quality was assessed by a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Total RNA from each sample (5 to 8 μg) was used for poly(A) mRNA selection, using Oligotex mRNA kit (Qiagen, Milan, Italy). The poly(A)-enriched RNA samples were reverse-transcribed into cDNA using random-sequence primers. cDNA libraries preparation and subsequent pyrosequencing (applying 200-nucleotide cycles) were carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

RNA-Seq data analysis

RNA-seq reads obtained (Additional file 2: Table S1) were tested for sequence quality by FastQC [33] (Additional file 3: Figure S2) and those ≥100 bp were mapped onto the hg18/NCBI36-annotated human genome, using the Next Generation Sequencing. TRanscriptome profile Explorer (NGS-Trex) platform [34]. Multiple mappings were allowed to avoid too large a cutoff derived from paralogous genes (Additional file 4; Methods). Genes were considered expressed if at least one read was mapped. Raw digital expression read count per gene (considering all the mapped mRNA isoforms together) was used for the differential expression analysis with the edgeR [35] package of Bioconductor [36] (Additional file 4; Methods). Only genes with at least one read in all the four samples studied were considered in the statistical analysis using Fisher’s exact test. A P-value ≤0.05 was used as the threshold to consider a gene as differentially expressed (DE). The Bioconductor goseq [37] package was used to associate all DE genes to Gene Ontology (GO) categories and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways (Additional file 4; Methods), while the GeneMania server [38] was used to carry out gene network analyses by searching among several interaction databases, related bibliographic references and for GO categories enrichment within only overexpressed genes found in each group. The HIF-1α pathway reconstruction was manually curated [39–44] from interaction databases (BioGRID, HPRD, Pathway Commons, GEO dataset), with GeneMania and from NCBI Interaction and GeneRIF sections of the HIF-1A gene entry [45]. Representation of upregulated and downregulated genes in the heatmaps was prepared using the limma package of R [46], applying a hierarchical clustering onto log2 normalized digital gene expression values (Additional file 4; Methods). Validation of RNA-Seq data was performed with qRT-PCR as indicated in Additional file 4; Methods.

Immunohistochemical analysis

Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis with antibodies against NDUFB8 subunit of CI (Invitrogen, Milan, Italy) and HIF-1α (Upstate Biotech, Billerica, MA, USA) was performed as previously reported [47]. The semi-quantitative analysis of the stained sections was done by light-microscopy at 100× magnification. The evaluation of cytoplasmic NDUFB8 immunostaining was performed according to the percentage of positive cells (range 0 to 4) and to the staining intensity (range 0 to 3) using a modified immunoreactivity score (IRS) [48, 49]. The final staining evaluation for each sample was obtained by combining the two values (range 0 to 12). The population of cells with a positive HIF-1α nuclear immunostaining was quantified using a computerized, morphometric, interactive, digital image analysis as previously described [50]. The labeling index was expressed as the percentage of the labeled nuclear area over the total nuclear area for tumor cells in the section.

Pimonidazole staining

Animals were injected intraperitoneally with 60 mg/kg pimonidazole (Hypoxyprobe-1 Plus Kit, HPI, Burlington, MA, USA) 3 h prior to sacrifice. Xenografts were treated and fluorescence visualized as previously reported [15].

α-KG and SA measurements

Measurements of metabolites α-KG and SA were carried out in ex vivo cell lines derived from OST-93 and OST-93ND1 essentially as previously described [15]. The t-test was used for statistical comparison.

Statistical analyses

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for all statistical analyses unless otherwise indicated.

Results

Allotopic MT-ND1 expression corrects CI-dependent mitochondrial energetic dysfunction

In order to recover CI function, we took advantage of the previously characterized osteosarcoma cell models (OS-93) bearing the quasi-homoplasmic disruptive m.3571insC mutation in the MT-ND1 gene, which encodes the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (ND1) of CI [14, 15] (Additional file 5: Figure S3A). The mutation was complemented by recoding MT-ND1 for cytosolic translation (nND1) using in vitro site-directed mutagenesis (Additional file 5: Figure S3B). A eukaryotic expression construct was designed with the aim to facilitate nND1 mRNA targeting to the outer mitochondrial membrane [23] (Additional file 5: Figure S3C). ND1-null OS-93 cells were then transfected with the allotopic construct to generate OS-93ND1 clones, in which nND1 mRNA expression was confirmed by qRT-PCR (Additional file 5: Figure S3D). Western blot analysis on enriched mitochondrial fractions showed that ND1 was present exclusively in OS-93ND1 allotopic clones (Figure 1A), indicating that the protein was correctly synthesized and localized within mitochondria. We next addressed the issue of genetic revertants by measuring the precise load of mutant mtDNA by F-PCR (Figure 1B) and DHPLC (Additional file 6: Figure S4). Genetic revertants were not carried along in subsequent analyses. Moreover, by sequencing the whole MT-ND1 gene, clones were repeatedly controlled so that no additional mutations had accumulated that could complement the m.3571insC, for example, via recovery of the open reading frame. No difference in growth rate was found in glucose medium between CI-deficient and CI-competent cell clones (Additional file 7: Figure S5), indicating their basal metabolism to be mainly glycolytic, as it occurs generally when cells grow in vitro in presence of nutrients and oxygen. In order to verify whether the nND1 subunit was able to restore functional CI, the bioenergetics competence and redox state of cell clones were explored. CI-IGA analysis showed a band corresponding to fully assembled and functional CI in both wild-type mtDNA control (CC) and in OS-93ND1 cells, but not in OS-93 (Figure 1C), indicating a recovery of CI activity. This finding was confirmed by measuring the NAD+/NADH ratio, which was significantly recuperated by about 50% in OS-93ND1 compared to OS-93 cells (Figure 1D), likely due to recuperated consumption of NADH in the allotopic clone, albeit not as much as in control cells (Figure 1E). The basal respiration of OS-93ND1 clones was higher than in OS-93 and it was inhibited by oligomycin, indicating at least a partial rescue of phosphorylation capacity (Figure 1F). Furthermore, respiration was stimulated by addition of the uncoupler trifluorocarbonylcyanide phenylhydrazone (FCCP) and largely inhibited by rotenone and antimycin A (AA), confirming the rescue of CI function (Figure 1F). This finding was strengthened by the fact that OS-93ND1 cells partially but significantly recuperated CI-driven ATP synthesis compared to OS-93, as evaluated in digitonin-permeabilized cells in the presence of specific substrates (Figure 1G). No difference in CII-driven ATP synthesis was detected between allotopic and ND1-null cells, suggesting no alteration of the remaining spans of oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 1G). Moreover, similarly to CC, mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) was maintained in allotopic cells after the addition of the ATP-synthase inhibitor oligomycin, whereas OS-93 cells rapidly depolarized (Figure 1H). Taken together, these results demonstrate that ND1 allotopic expression permitted recovery of a functional CI and rescued cellular bioenergetics competence.
Figure 1

Expression and functional effects of allotopic nND1. (A) Western blot analysis for ND1 in control (CC), OS-93 and OS-93ND1 representative clones. Voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) was used as a loading control. One representative experiment of three is shown. (B) m.3571insC mutation load evaluation by fluorescent (F)-PCR. Wild-type and mutant fragments are distinguished based on the length of the homopolymeric stretch, where 7C corresponds to the C insertion. (C) Complex I in-gel activity (CI-IGA) assay in isolated mitochondria. CI-IGA band is indicated with an arrow. One representative experiment of four is shown. (D-E) NAD+/NADH ratio and NADH levels were measured in cell lysates. Data (mean ± SD) are expressed as pmoles of NADH and normalized for protein content (n = 3; *P <0.05; **P <0.01). (F) Oxygen consumption rate (OCR). Measurements were performed upon injection of 1 μM oligomycin (O), 0.1 μM trifluorocarbonylcyanide phenylhydrazone (FCCP) (F), 1 μM rotenone (R) and 1 μM antimycin A (AA). The inset shows the OCR control cell line (CC) profile, analogous to that of OS-93ND1 cells. Data (mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM)) are expressed as pmoles of O2 per minute per 3 × 104 cells (n = 3). (G) Mitochondrial ATP synthesis driven by pyruvate/malate and succinate, CI and CII substrates, respectively. CS, citrate synthase. (n = 4; #undetectable value; **OS-93 vs CC, P <0.01; **OS-93ND1 vs OS-93, P <0.01; *CC vs OS-93ND1, P <0.05). (H) Mitochondrial membrane potential evaluation in CC, OS-93 and OS-93ND1 cells. Arrows indicate the addition of 6 μM oligomycin (O) and 4 μM FCCP (F). Data are mean ± SEM (n = 6). Fluorescence readings following the addition of oligomycin and preceding that of FCCP revealed a statistically significant difference (P <0.05) for all time points between OS-93 and both CC and OS-93ND1 cells.

Complex I-competent allotopic clones recover tumorigenic potential

To address the question of whether CI function is required for cancer cell growth, CC, OS-93 and OS-93ND1 were tested for their capacity to grow in an anchorage-independent manner. Allotopically complemented cells formed larger and significantly more numerous colonies than their mock clones (Figure 2A-B). Cells were injected in nude mice to determine their tumorigenic potential in vivo. Similar to controls, OS-93ND1-derived tumors (OST-93ND1) grew significantly larger than those derived from OS-93 cells (OST-93) (Figure 2C), demonstrating that the recovery of CI function in vivo (Figure 2D) is required for tumor growth. We have previously demonstrated that in the presence of a quasi-homoplasmic m.3571insC mutation, mitochondrial morphology is heavily deranged [15]. In fact, electron micrographs of OST-93 tumors showed large mitochondria with clear matrix and almost total loss of cristae (Figure 2E). On the other hand, OST-93ND1 and CC tumors presented with a population of mitochondria mostly with darker matrix and normal cristae (Figure 2E), indicating that the recovery of CI function was strictly associated with a recuperation of a normal mitochondrial morphology. These findings confirm the beneficial effects of allotopic ND1 expression on mitochondria in vivo. In order to rule out that such recovery might be due to a genetic reversion occurring during xenograft growth, we resequenced the mtDNA derived from the tumors and no other mutations apart from the m.3571insC were detected. Occurrence of revertant genotypes was also excluded by F-PCR (Figure 2F) and DHPLC analysis (Additional file 8: Figure S6). Overall, these data clearly indicate that CI function is required to sustain tumor growth in vivo.
Figure 2

Complex I (CI) function is required for recovery of tumorigenic potential in vitro and in vivo. (A) Representative images of anchorage-independent colony growth in soft agar of control (CC), OS-93 and OS-93ND1 cell lines. (B) Colony count on soft agar plate after 7 days; data are mean ± SD (n = 3, *P <0.05). (C) Tumor growth induced upon injection of CC, OS-93 and OS-93ND1 cell lines in nude mice. Data are mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 3, 5 to 10 animals inoculated in each experiment; *P < 0.05; *CC and OS-93ND1 versus OS-93). (D) CI-in gel activity (IGA) assay in tumor homogenates from CC, OST-93 and OST-93ND1 tumors. One representative experiment of three is shown. (E) Representative electron micrographs of CC, OST-93 and OST-93ND1 tumors. Asterisks indicate diverse mitochondrial morphology. (F) Fluorescent-PCR analysis of the m.3571insC in OS-93 and OS-93ND1 cell lines and xenografts (OST). All xenografts maintained the same m.3571insC mutant load as their corresponding cell lines (>90%).

We next addressed the involvement of ROS, since they have been shown to positively contribute to tumor growth and metastasis [18, 51]. Hydrogen peroxide and superoxide levels were measured in the absence and in presence of AA (Additional file 4; Methods), an inhibitor of complex III (CIII) and the main superoxide inducer [17]. We previously reported that CI-ablated cells may be expected to produce fewer radicals, due to lack of one of the two ROS production sites [14, 15], a trend we also observed here between CC and both OS-93 and allotopic OS-93ND1 (Additional file 9: Figure S7A-B), albeit not significant. Further, upon AA treatment, a significant increase in ROS levels was observed only in CC, whereas no increase was shown to occur in OS-93 and OS-93ND1 cells. These findings suggest that the severe CI mutation may not permit the normal electron flow through the complex and the rest of the respiratory chain, failing to ensure a minimal amount of electrons required for production of radicals, even in the presence of inhibited CIII. In allotopic cells, we failed to detect a rescue of ROS levels, indicating that the amount of fully re-assembled CI was lower than in CC cells, finally allowing us to rule out a major ROS contribution in determining the different tumorigenic potential of allotopic compared to CI-deficient cells.

Global transcriptomic profiling reveals a HIF-1α-regulated Warburg phenotype in allotopic tumors

With the aim of dissecting the molecular pathways determining tumor growth or arrest in dependence of CI recovery, we next conducted a global transcriptomic profiling on OST-93 and OST-93ND1 xenografts. We found 521 DE genes, out of which 226 upregulated in OST-93 and 296 in OST-93ND1 samples (Figure 3A and Additional file 2: Table S1), with fold changes ranging between 2.0 and 13.8. The most significant GO categories among OST-93ND1 upregulated genes included the activation of the translational apparatus (Additional file 10: Table S2).
Figure 3

Transcriptional profile of OST-93 and OST-93 ND1 xenografts. (A) Heatmap displaying expression levels of the 521 differentially expressed (DE) genes in the samples analyzed. Dark red = upregulated genes; cyan = downregulated genes. (B) The transcriptional profile of the Warburg phenotype. Heatmap showing gene expression profile of 21 DE genes from the hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) activation pathway. Genes are ordered by decreasing log2 fold change. Glucose transporters and glycolytic genes are marked in red. (C) Glucose uptake and glycolytic reactions. Genes overexpressed in OST-93ND1 xenografts are labeled in red. Red circles represent glucose molecules. (D) Quantitative real-time PCR validation performed on biological replicates of OST-93 (n = 2) and OST-93ND1 (n = 7) for 9/21 HIF-1α-responsive genes found DE in RNA-Seq (*P <0.05).

We have previously demonstrated that CI-deficient tumors are unable to respond to hypoxia via the destabilization of transcription factor HIF-1α [14, 15]. In order to assess the involvement of HIF-1α-responsive targets, we specifically looked at such pathways within the set of DE genes. Interestingly, 21 out of 521 genes were downstream targets of HIF-1α (Figure 3B), most of which were known to be overexpressed during the hypoxia response. Remarkably, HIF-1α-responsive NDRG1, LGALS3 and IGFBP3, overexpressed in OST-93ND1 tumors, were among the top-ranked DE genes detected here, with a false discovery rate (FDR) <5% (Additional file 2: Table S1). In agreement with data on known HIF-1α-repressed gene targets, a significant under-expression of MCM10, BRCA1 and TPM1 was found in OST-93ND1 tumors, suggesting an overall activation of the HIF-1α-regulated pathway occurring exclusively in allotopic xenografts (Figure 3B). Among HIF-1α-responsive genes, a cluster of four belonging to the glycolytic pathway (PFKP, GAPDH, PGK1 and LDHA) and two encoding glucose transporters (SLC2A1, SLC2A3) were significantly overexpressed in OST-93ND1 tumors (Figure 3B-C). No other significant differential expression was evident from the transcriptomic data analysis regarding genes involved in cellular metabolism, indicating that glycolysis may be prevalently responsible for the higher growth ability of CI-competent cancer cells, suggesting the existence of a Warburg transcriptional profile in such tumors. Transcriptomic data were confirmed and validated by qRT-PCR (Figure 3D), which highly correlated (R2 = 0.91) with the RNA-Seq data (Additional file 11: Figure S8).

HIF-1α stabilization occurs upon CI recovery and decreased α-KG/SA ratio

To assess whether restoring CI via nND1 expression affected HIF-1α stabilization, IHC analysis was performed on OST-93 and OST-93ND1 xenografts. Positive staining of both the NDUFB8 CI subunit and HIF-1α was found only in OST-93ND1 tumors (Figure 4A panels a-d). Both OST-93 and OST-93ND1 masses positively stained with hypoxic marker pimonidazole, indicating that HIF-1α was not stabilized in OST-93 tumors despite the low-oxygen tension microenvironment in vivo (Figure 4A panels e-f). The strong association between CI and HIF-1α stabilization was furthermore evident from the high correlation (R2 = 0.898) of the NDUFB8 and HIF-1α IHC staining (Figure 4B). Moreover, the protein expression levels of HIF-1α and its downstream target LDHA, were increased only in OST-93ND1 xenografts, demonstrating that HIF-1α was only functional in CI-competent tumors (Figure 4C). Since HIF-1α turnover is known to be affected by the α-KG/SA ratio, we investigated the levels of these two tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle metabolites in OST-93- and OST-93ND1-derived cells. The α-KG/SA ratio was significantly higher in OST-93 compared to OST-93ND1 (Figure 4D), clearly indicating that CI function influenced the balance of these TCA cycle metabolites and in turn, permitted HIF-1α stabilization. Last, we attempted to verify whether HIF-1α was responsible for the augmented tumorigenic potential of allotopic compared to CI-deficient cells. To this aim, we used the potent HIF-1α stabilizer DMOG, a specific inhibitor of PHDs, to force HIF-1α stabilization in cells, and evaluated their tumorigenic potential in soft agar. Interestingly, DMOG-treated OS-93 CI-deficient cells displayed a significantly increased colony-forming ability by about 50% (P <0.05).
Figure 4

Complex I (CI) rescue correlates with decrease in α-ketoglutarate (α-KG)/ succinate (SA) ratio and recovery of hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) stabilization. (A) Representative immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of CI (NDUFB8) and HIF-1α in OST-93 and OST-93ND1 xenografts. Positive NDUFB8 (b) and HIF-1α staining (d) is observed in OST-93ND1 but not in OST-93 xenografts (a, c); magnification 100×. Pimonidazole staining of representative OST-93 and OST-93ND1 xenografts (e, f); magnification 63×. (B) Correlation between NDUFB8 and HIF-1α IHC staining scores. X-axis represents NDUFB8 staining scores obtained considering the percentage of positive cells and staining intensity. Y-axis represents the percentage of HIF-1α-positive nuclei. (C) Western blot analysis of HIF-1α and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) protein levels in OST-93 and OST-93ND1 tumors. Coomassie staining was used as loading control (input). (D) The ratio of α-KG and SA levels was calculated by measurements for each metabolite in OST-93- and OST-93ND1-derived cell lines. Data are mean ± SD (n = 3, *P <0.05). (E) Scheme of the metabolic changes in the absence/recovery of functional CI in cancer cells. Non-functional CI leading to an increase of the α-KG/SA ratio (left panel), which may foster activity of prolyl-hydroxylases (PHDs) with subsequent HIF-1α degradation even at low oxygen. Inactivation of HIF-1α leads to the downregulation of glycolysis needed to compensate for the defective mitochondrial respiration. This scenario may not allow the metabolic adaptation of tumor cells, possibly inducing a short-circuited mitochondrial compensatory proliferation. Due to a recuperated NADH consumption, CI rescue restores the α-KG/SA balance (right panel), hence not preventing HIF-1α stabilization. HIF-1α may therefore translocate into the nucleus with HIF-1β and activate transcription of target genes (red ovals and rectangles), among which those contributing to increase the glycolytic flux, hence conferring a Warburg phenotype and allowing tumor adaptation and growth. Red elements indicate activation or overexpression.

Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrate that functional mitochondrial CI is required for the induction of the Warburg phenotype, namely the metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells towards glycolysis during tumor progression in vivo. Our results strongly indicate that the mechanism through which CI regulates the glycolytic shift is mediated by HIF-1α stabilization, allowing tumor cells to adapt to hypoxia and persist in proliferation.

In the last few years the Warburg effect has been widely debated, in particular with respect to the role of mitochondria in the regulation of cancer metabolism. In fact, at least three of the four potential causes of the Warburg effect revolve around metabolic processes that converge directly or indirectly to mitochondria. In this framework, it is interesting that two key enzymes of the TCA cycle, namely FH and SDH (complex II of the respiratory chain) are de facto tumor suppressor genes whose loss-of-function mutations provide a permissive environment for oncogenic hits to trigger transformation [52]. The widely shown mechanism through which they facilitate tumor growth/adaptation is the stabilization of HIF-1α, the master mediator of progression towards malignancy, via the imbalance of TCA cycle metabolites α-KG and SA [53]. Our results show that, in contrast to what occurs with FH and SDH, severe CI loss-of-function mutations impinge on the cells ability to stabilize HIF-1α despite hypoxia, via a shift in the α-KG/SA ratio in favor of α-KG. We attempted to provide a functional connection between these phenomena via the evaluation of the NAD+/NADH ratio, which we confirmed to be decreased in CI-deficient cells, likely due to a lower NADH consumption in absence of the complex. It has long been known that NADH accumulation contributes to the allosteric inhibition of α-KG dehydrogenase, with subsequent α-KG accumulation [54], which may lead to HIF-1α destabilization and hence triggering of pseudonormoxia.

These findings suggest that a novel two-way relationship exists between HIF-1α and mitochondria, besides the well-known negative regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase by pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1, which is a known positive target of HIF-1α [12, 13]. It has been proposed that a slowdown in oxidative metabolism may confer an advantage to tumor cells by decreasing their oxygen requirements and by inducing anabolic reactions [8, 55]. Nevertheless, there is also evidence for a correlation between CI inhibition and HIF-1α destabilization, as shown using pharmacological treatment with respiratory chain inhibitors [56, 57]. Moreover, several studies have shown that loss of respiratory CIII may contribute to ROS-mediated destabilization of HIF-1α [58, 59], similar to the disassembling CI mutations that we have extensively reported [14, 15]. We previously proved that the homoplasmic m.3571insC/MT-ND1 mtDNA mutation causes a complete loss of CI activity, hampering tumor growth both in vitro and in vivo[15]. Such types of homoplasmic disruptive mutations impinging on CI function do occur in human cancers, where they are generally associated to the oncocytic phenotype and to an indolent, low aggressive behavior, and even to a higher chromosomal stability [14, 21, 60–63].

In order to provide a proof of concept that CI function is necessary for recovery of tumor growth, we complemented the OS-93 cell line with the wild-type MT-ND1 using an allotopic expression strategy. The xenografts subjected to the next generation RNA-Seq technique showed significant upregulation of ribosomal biogenesis and protein translation in tumors with a functional CI (Additional file 10: Table S2), a profile previously defined as a molecular marker of cancer phenotype. In fact, an augmented synthesis of ribosomes, and consequently of proteins, can sustain the high rate of proliferation required by cancer cells [64, 65]. Moreover, a significant upregulation of HIF-1α-responsive genes was detected in allotopic tumors, in particular those involved in glycolytic metabolism. They were all found to be overexpressed in cells with intact CI, defining a glycolytic transcriptional profile typical of fast-growing tumors [5, 6, 44, 66]. The indication that such a HIF-1α-mediated Warburg profile is essential to tumor progression was provided by the rescue of anchorage-independent cell growth upon forced stabilization of the transcription factor by DMOG.

Further studies in vivo are warranted to definitely prove that pseudonormoxia is the main determinant of the decreased tumorigenic potential of CI-deficient cells. Nonetheless, our in vitro data support the hypothesis that a strong metabolic impairment impacts on the HIF-1α-dependent adaptive ability of cancer cells, likely via a TCA imbalance. In fact, HIF-1α degradation is mediated by the PHD enzymes, which hydroxylate the transcription factor using α-KG in a reaction that in turn produces SA, an allosteric inhibitor of the PHDs [53]. Recovery of CI activity was shown here to restore a physiological α-KG/SA ratio, indicating that TCA cycle reactivation may be necessary to provide the metabolic conditions for the induction of a hypoxic response with a consequent HIF-1α stabilization (Figure 4E). Such a condition may well depend on a re-balanced ratio of NAD+/NADH, which followed CI recovery. In fact, such a metabolite-sensing mechanism and allosteric enzyme regulation may represent a quick route through which cancer cells can respond to the selective pressure of the ever-changing tumor microenvironment, as several studies underline [67]. A similar regulation may be crucial to carry out the switch between glycolytic and oxidative metabolism in specific phases of tumor progression, as explained in a recently proposed wave-like model of regulation of tumor metabolism [6].

Revitalization of mitochondrial function has been proposed as one of the phases following hypoxic adaptation, when nutrients and oxygen are again available to cancer cells. In this context, inactivating CI mtDNA mutations, such as m.3571insC/MT-ND1, may exhibit their effect only at mitochondrial-dependent stages of tumor progression. These effects have been shown to vary, depending on mutant load and mutation type [21]. For instance, the m.3571insC mutation investigated here has been shown to exhibit anti-tumorigenic effects when present above the 83% threshold [15]. On the other hand, some missense CI mtDNA mutations have been demonstrated to promote tumor growth [18, 19]. Overall, it is reasonable to suggest that although a certain degree of mitochondrial dysfunction can be advantageous when selective pressures operate, total impairment of OXPHOS may not sustain tumor progression. It is therefore of paramount importance to note that both the degree of heteroplasmy and the type of mutation (missense vs truncating) must be carefully taken into account when considering the prognostic value of such genetic markers, since they may determine a completely opposite tumor fate, according to whether CI is functional or not [15, 20, 21, 68, 69]. From our results, in fact, it has emerged that intact CI is needed for adaptation to hypoxia, which is in agreement with previous reports showing that HIF-1α stabilization requires functional OXPHOS in conditions of oxygen shortage [59, 70].

Conclusions

The role of CI in the induction of the Warburg phenotype and hypoxia response in cancer cells suggests that it may no longer be considered an enzyme that merely contributes to mitochondrial function, but that it may be pivotal in determining the fate of cancer cells after deregulation of their metabolic switch during tumor progression. Therefore, CI, far from being considered a tumor suppressor, ought more likely to be looked upon as a lethality modifier of cancer cells when complete loss-of-function mutations occur. Such concepts, epitomized by the definition of oncojanus mitochondrial mutations [15], has potential applications in establishing prognostic criteria, since genetic markers such as CI-disruptive mutations may have a strong impact on the successful metabolic adaptation of the neoplasia.

Authors’ information

Co-first authors: Claudia Calabrese, Luisa Iommarini and Ivana Kurelac; co-last authors: Giuseppe Gasparre and Anna Maria Porcelli.

Abbreviations

AA: 

Antimycin A

AC: 

Aconitase

α-KG: 

α-ketoglutarate

ANOVA: 

Analysis of variance

BN-PAGE: 

Blue native polyacrlylammide gel electrophoresis

bp: 

Base pair

CC: 

Control cell line

CI: 

Complex I

CS: 

Citrate synthase

DE: 

Differentially expressed

DHPLC: 

Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography

DMEM: 

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium

DMOG: 

Dimethyloxallylglycine

FBS: 

Fetal bovine serum

FCCP: 

Trifluorocarbonylcyanide phenylhydrazone

FDR: 

False discovery rate

FH: 

Fumarate hydratase

F-PCR: 

Fluorescent polymerase chain reaction

GO: 

Gene ontology

HIF-1α: 

Hypoxia inducible factor-1α

IDH: 

Isocitrate dehydrogenase

IGA: 

In gel activity

IHC: 

Immunohistochemical

IRS: 

Immunoreactivity score

KEGG: 

Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes

KG-D: 

α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase

LDHA: 

: Lactate dehydrogenase A

MDH: 

Malate dehydrogenase

mtDNA: 

Mitochondrial DNA

NGS-Trex: 

Next generation sequencing-TRanscriptome profile explorer

OCR: 

Oxygen consumption rate

OXPHOS: 

Oxidative phosphorylation

PBS: 

Phosphate-buffered saline

PHD: 

Prolyl-hydroxylase

qRT-PCR: 

Quantitative real-time PCR

rCRS: 

Revised Cambridge Reference Sequence

ROS: 

Reactive oxygen species

SA: 

Succinate

S-CoA-s: 

Succinyl-CoA synthase

SDH: 

Succinate dehydrogenase

TCA: 

Tricarboxylic acid

TMRM: 

Tetramethylrhodamine methyl esther

UTR: 

Untranslated region

VDAC: 

Voltage-dependent anion channel.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr A Martinuzzi (IRCCS E. Medea, Conegliano Veneto, Italy) for cybrid generation and to Prof. P Bernardi (University of Padua, Italy) for allowing use of the SeaHorse technology. This work was supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR) grants FIRB Futuro in Ricerca “TRANSMIT” 2008 to GG, and PRIN 2008 to AMP. This work was also supported by the Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC IG8810) to GR, by Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Puglia to MA and by grant DISCO TRIP from the Fondazione Umberto Veronesi to GG. IK is supported by a triennial Borromeo AIRC fellowship. LI is supported by an annual fellowship from the Fondazione Umberto Veronesi.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dip. Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche (DIMEC), U.O. Genetica Medica, Pol. Universitario S. Orsola-Malpighi, Università di Bologna
(2)
Dip. Farmacia e Biotecnologie (FABIT), Università di Bologna
(3)
Dip. Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Università di Bologna
(4)
Laboratorio di Oncologia Sperimentale, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli
(5)
Dip. Scienze Biomediche, Università di Padova
(6)
Istituto di Tecnologie Biomediche - ITB, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR)
(7)
Dip. Bioscienze, Biotecnologie e Scienze Farmacologiche, Università di Bari
(8)
IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche
(9)
Dip. Sc. Radiologiche ed Istopatologiche, Pol. Universitario S.Orsola-Malpighi, Università di Bologna
(10)
Centro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca Industriale Scienze della Vita e Tecnologie per la Salute, Università di Bologna

References

  1. Koppenol WH, Bounds PL, Dang CV: Otto Warburg’s contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010, 11: 325-337.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Warburg O, Posener K, Negelein E: Uber den Stoffwechsel der Carcinomzelle. Biochem Zeitschr. 1924, 152: 309-344.Google Scholar
  3. Ward PS, Thompson CB: Metabolic reprogramming: a cancer hallmark even Warburg did not anticipate. Cancer Cell. 2012, 21: 297-308. 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.014.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. DeBerardinis RJ, Lum JJ, Hatzivassiliou G, Thompson CB: The biology of cancer: metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation. Cell Metab. 2008, 7: 11-20. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Moreno-Sanchez R, Rodriguez-Enriquez S, Marin-Hernandez A, Saavedra E: Energy metabolism in tumor cells. Febs J. 2007, 274: 1393-1418. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05686.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Smolkova K, Plecita-Hlavata L, Bellance N, Benard G, Rossignol R, Jezek P: Waves of gene regulation suppress and then restore oxidative phosphorylation in cancer cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010, 43: 950-968.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandra D, Singh KK: Genetic insights into OXPHOS defect and its role in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1807, 2011: 620-625.Google Scholar
  8. Galluzzi L, Morselli E, Kepp O, Vitale I, Rigoni A, Vacchelli E, Michaud M, Zischka H, Castedo M, Kroemer G: Mitochondrial gateways to cancer. Mol Aspects Med. 2010, 31: 1-20. 10.1016/j.mam.2009.08.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chavez A, Miranda LF, Pichiule P, Chavez JC: Mitochondria and hypoxia-induced gene expression mediated by hypoxia-inducible factors. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2008, 1147: 312-320. 10.1196/annals.1427.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Semenza GL: Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) pathway. Sci STKE. 2007, 2007: cm8-10.1126/stke.4072007cm8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Semenza GL, Roth PH, Fang HM, Wang GL: Transcriptional regulation of genes encoding glycolytic enzymes by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 23757-23763.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim JW, Tchernyshyov I, Semenza GL, Dang CV: HIF-1-mediated expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: a metabolic switch required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia. Cell Metab. 2006, 3: 177-185. 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.02.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Papandreou I, Cairns RA, Fontana L, Lim AL, Denko NC: HIF-1 mediates adaptation to hypoxia by actively downregulating mitochondrial oxygen consumption. Cell Metab. 2006, 3: 187-197. 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.01.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Porcelli AM, Ghelli A, Ceccarelli C, Lang M, Cenacchi G, Capristo M, Pennisi LF, Morra I, Ciccarelli E, Melcarne A, Bartoletti-Stella A, Salfi N, Tallini G, Martinuzzi A, Carelli V, Attimonelli M, Rugolo M, Romeo G, Gasparre G: The genetic and metabolic signature of oncocytic transformation implicates HIF1alpha destabilization. Hum Mol Genet. 2010, 19: 1019-1032. 10.1093/hmg/ddp566.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gasparre G, Kurelac I, Capristo M, Iommarini L, Ghelli A, Ceccarelli C, Nicoletti G, Nanni P, De Giovanni C, Scotlandi K, Betts CM, Carelli V, Lollini PL, Romeo G, Rugolo M, Porcelli AM: A mutation threshold distinguishes the antitumorigenic effects of the mitochondrial gene MTND1, an oncojanus function. Cancer Res. 2011, 71: 6220-6229. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Brandt U: Energy converting NADH:quinone oxidoreductase (complex I). Annu Rev Biochem. 2006, 75: 69-92. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142539.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Koopman WJ, Nijtmans LG, Dieteren CE, Roestenberg P, Valsecchi F, Smeitink JA, Willems PH: Mammalian mitochondrial complex I: biogenesis, regulation, and reactive oxygen species generation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2010, 12: 1431-1470. 10.1089/ars.2009.2743.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ishikawa K, Takenaga K, Akimoto M, Koshikawa N, Yamaguchi A, Imanishi H, Nakada K, Honma Y, Hayashi J: ROS-generating mitochondrial DNA mutations can regulate tumor cell metastasis. Science. 2008, 320: 661-664. 10.1126/science.1156906.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sharma LK, Fang H, Liu J, Vartak R, Deng J, Bai Y: Mitochondrial respiratory complex I dysfunction promotes tumorigenesis through ROS alteration and AKT activation. Hum Mol Genet. 2011, 20: 4605-4616. 10.1093/hmg/ddr395.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Park JS, Sharma LK, Li H, Xiang R, Holstein D, Wu J, Lechleiter J, Naylor SL, Deng JJ, Lu J, Bai Y: A heteroplasmic, not homoplasmic, mitochondrial DNA mutation promotes tumorigenesis via alteration in reactive oxygen species generation and apoptosis. Hum Mol Genet. 2009, 18: 1578-1589. 10.1093/hmg/ddp069.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Iommarini L, Calvaruso MA, Kurelac I, Gasparre G, Porcelli AM: Complex I impairment in mitochondrial diseases and cancer: Parallel roads leading to different outcomes. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013, 45 (1): 47-63. 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.05.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zielke A, Tezelman S, Jossart GH, Wong M, Siperstein AE, Duh QY, Clark OH: Establishment of a highly differentiated thyroid cancer cell line of Hurthle cell origin. Thyroid. 1998, 8: 475-483. 10.1089/thy.1998.8.475.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bonnet C, Kaltimbacher V, Ellouze S, Augustin S, Benit P, Forster V, Rustin P, Sahel JA, Corral-Debrinski M: Allotopic mRNA localization to the mitochondrial surface rescues respiratory chain defects in fibroblasts harboring mitochondrial DNA mutations affecting complex I or v subunits. Rejuvenation Res. 2007, 10: 127-144. 10.1089/rej.2006.0526.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rozen S, Skaletsky H: Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol. 2000, 132: 365-386.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. OligoAnalyzer. [http://eu.idtdna.com/analyzer/Applications/OligoAnalyzer/]
  26. Guerra F, Kurelac I, Cormio A, Zuntini R, Amato LB, Ceccarelli C, Santini D, Cormio G, Fracasso F, Selvaggi L, Resta L, Attimonelli M, Gadaleta MN, Gasparre G: Placing mitochondrial DNA mutations within the progression model of type I endometrial carcinoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2011, 20: 2394-2405. 10.1093/hmg/ddr146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kurelac I, Lang M, Zuntini R, Calabrese C, Simone D, Vicario S, Santamaria M, Attimonelli M, Romeo G, Gasparre G: Searching for a needle in the haystack: comparing six methods to evaluate heteroplasmy in difficult sequence context. Biotechnol Adv. 2011, 30: 363-371.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Calvaruso MA, Smeitink J, Nijtmans L: Electrophoresis techniques to investigate defects in oxidative phosphorylation. Methods. 2008, 46: 281-287. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.09.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wittig I, Karas M, Schagger H: High resolution clear native electrophoresis for in-gel functional assays and fluorescence studies of membrane protein complexes. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007, 6: 1215-1225. 10.1074/mcp.M700076-MCP200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Porcelli AM, Angelin A, Ghelli A, Mariani E, Martinuzzi A, Carelli V, Petronilli V, Bernardi P, Rugolo M: Respiratory complex I dysfunction due to mitochondrial DNA mutations shifts the voltage threshold for opening of the permeability transition pore toward resting levels. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 2045-2052.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones DP: Determination of pyridine dinucleotides in cell extracts by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr. 1981, 225: 446-449. 10.1016/S0378-4347(00)80293-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Giorgio V, Petronilli V, Ghelli A, Carelli V, Rugolo M, Lenaz G, Bernardi P: The effects of idebenone on mitochondrial bioenergetics. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1817, 2011: 363-369.Google Scholar
  33. FastQC.http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc,
  34. NGS-Trex.http://www.ngs-trex.org,
  35. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK: edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010, 26: 139-140. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Bioconductor.http://www.bioconductor.org,
  37. Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A: Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010, 11: R14-10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Warde-Farley D, Donaldson SL, Comes O, Zuberi K, Badrawi R, Chao P, Franz M, Grouios C, Kazi F, Lopes CT, Maitland A, Mostafavi S, Montojo J, Shao Q, Wright G, Bader GD, Morris Q: The GeneMANIA prediction server: biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38 (Web Server issue): W214-220.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Manalo DJ, Rowan A, Lavoie T, Natarajan L, Kelly BD, Ye SQ, Garcia JG, Semenza GL: Transcriptional regulation of vascular endothelial cell responses to hypoxia by HIF-1. Blood. 2005, 105: 659-669. 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2958.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Greijer AE, van der Groep P, Kemming D, Shvarts A, Semenza GL, Meijer GA, van de Wiel MA, Belien JA, van Diest PJ, van der Wall E: Up-regulation of gene expression by hypoxia is mediated predominantly by hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1). J Pathol. 2005, 206: 291-304. 10.1002/path.1778.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nickols NG, Jacobs CS, Farkas ME, Dervan PB: Modulating hypoxia-inducible transcription by disrupting the HIF-1-DNA interface. ACS Chem Biol. 2007, 2: 561-571. 10.1021/cb700110z.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Benita Y, Kikuchi H, Smith AD, Zhang MQ, Chung DC, Xavier RJ: An integrative genomics approach identifies Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1 (HIF-1)-target genes that form the core response to hypoxia. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37: 4587-4602. 10.1093/nar/gkp425.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang M, Li W, Chang GQ, Ye CS, Ou JS, Li XX, Liu Y, Cheang TY, Huang XL, Wang SM: MicroRNA-21 regulates vascular smooth muscle cell function via targeting tropomyosin 1 in arteriosclerosis obliterans of lower extremities. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011, 31: 2044-2053. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.229559.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Semenza GL: Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003, 3: 721-732.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. entry H-Ag. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/3091]
  46. R-project.http://www.r-project.org,
  47. Bartoletti-Stella A, Salfi NC, Ceccarelli C, Attimonelli M, Romeo G, Gasparre G: Mitochondrial DNA mutations in oncocytic adnexal lacrimal glands of the conjunctiva. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011, 129: 664-666.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Remmele W: Stegner HE: [Recommendation for uniform definition of an immunoreactive score (IRS) for immunohistochemical estrogen receptor detection (ER-ICA) in breast cancer tissue]. Pathologe. 1987, 8: 138-140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Ricciardiello L, Ceccarelli C, Angiolini G, Pariali M, Chieco P, Paterini P, Biasco G, Martinelli GN, Roda E, Bazzoli F: High thymidylate synthase expression in colorectal cancer with microsatellite instability: implications for chemotherapeutic strategies. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11: 4234-4240. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ceccarelli C, Santini D, Chieco P, Lanciotti C, Taffurelli M, Paladini G, Marrano D: Quantitative p21(waf-1)/p53 immunohistochemical analysis defines groups of primary invasive breast carcinomas with different prognostic indicators. Int J Cancer. 2001, 95: 128-134. 10.1002/1097-0215(20010320)95:2<128::AID-IJC1022>3.0.CO;2-D.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Petros JA, Baumann AK, Ruiz-Pesini E, Amin MB, Sun CQ, Hall J, Lim S, Issa MM, Flanders WD, Hosseini SH, Marshall FF, Wallace DC: mtDNA mutations increase tumorigenicity in prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 719-724. 10.1073/pnas.0408894102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. King A, Selak MA, Gottlieb E: Succinate dehydrogenase and fumarate hydratase: linking mitochondrial dysfunction and cancer. Oncogene. 2006, 25: 4675-4682. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209594.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Selak MA, Armour SM, MacKenzie ED, Boulahbel H, Watson DG, Mansfield KD, Pan Y, Simon MC, Thompson CB, Gottlieb E: Succinate links TCA cycle dysfunction to oncogenesis by inhibiting HIF-alpha prolyl hydroxylase. Cancer Cell. 2005, 7: 77-85. 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.11.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Bunik VI, Buneeva OA, Gomazkova VS: Change in alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase cooperative properties due to dihydrolipoate and NADH. FEBS Lett. 1990, 269: 252-254. 10.1016/0014-5793(90)81166-L.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Jones RG, Thompson CB: Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth. Genes Dev. 2009, 23: 537-548. 10.1101/gad.1756509.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Agani FH, Pichiule P, Carlos Chavez J, LaManna JC: Inhibitors of mitochondrial complex I attenuate the accumulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 during hypoxia in Hep3B cells. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2002, 132: 107-109. 10.1016/S1095-6433(01)00535-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Liu Y, Morgan JB, Coothankandaswamy V, Liu R, Jekabsons MB, Mahdi F, Nagle DG, Zhou YD: The Caulerpa pigment caulerpin inhibits HIF-1 activation and mitochondrial respiration. J Nat Prod. 2009, 72: 2104-2109. 10.1021/np9005794.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Guzy RD, Hoyos B, Robin E, Chen H, Liu L, Mansfield KD, Simon MC, Hammerling U, Schumacker PT: Mitochondrial complex III is required for hypoxia-induced ROS production and cellular oxygen sensing. Cell Metab. 2005, 1: 401-408. 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Mansfield KD, Guzy RD, Pan Y, Young RM, Cash TP, Schumacker PT, Simon MC: Mitochondrial dysfunction resulting from loss of cytochrome c impairs cellular oxygen sensing and hypoxic HIF-alpha activation. Cell Metab. 2005, 1: 393-399. 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Gasparre G, Hervouet E, de Laplanche E, Demont J, Pennisi LF, Colombel M, Mege-Lechevallier F, Scoazec JY, Bonora E, Smeets R, Smeitink J, Lazar V, Lespinasse J, Giraud S, Godinot C, Romeo G, Simonnet H: Clonal expansion of mutated mitochondrial DNA is associated with tumor formation and complex I deficiency in the benign renal oncocytoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2008, 17: 986-995.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Gasparre G, Porcelli AM, Bonora E, Pennisi LF, Toller M, Iommarini L, Ghelli A, Moretti M, Betts CM, Martinelli GN, Ceroni AR, Curcio F, Carelli V, Rugolo M, Tallini G, Romeo G: Disruptive mitochondrial DNA mutations in complex I subunits are markers of oncocytic phenotype in thyroid tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 9001-9006. 10.1073/pnas.0703056104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Gasparre G, Romeo G, Rugolo M, Porcelli AM: Learning from oncocytic tumors: Why choose inefficient mitochondria?. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1807, 2010: 633-642.Google Scholar
  63. Kurelac I, MacKay A, Lambros MB, Di Cesare E, Cenacchi G, Ceccarelli C, Morra I, Melcarne A, Morandi L, Calabrese FM, Attimonelli M, Tallini G, Reis-Filho JS, Gasparre G: Somatic complex I disruptive mitochondrial DNA mutations are modifiers of tumorigenesis that correlate with low genomic instability in pituitary adenomas. Hum Mol Genet. 2013, 22: 226-238. 10.1093/hmg/dds422.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Drygin D, Rice WG, Grummt I: The RNA polymerase I transcription machinery: an emerging target for the treatment of cancer. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010, 50: 131-156. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.010909.105844.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Montanaro L, Trere D, Derenzini M: Nucleolus, ribosomes, and cancer. Am J Pathol. 2008, 173: 301-310. 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070752.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Chaika NV, Yu F, Purohit V, Mehla K, Lazenby AJ, DiMaio D, Anderson JM, Yeh JJ, Johnson KR, Hollingsworth MA, Singh PK: Differential expression of metabolic genes in tumor and stromal components of primary and metastatic loci in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e32996-10.1371/journal.pone.0032996.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Briston T, Yang J, Ashcroft M: HIF-1alpha localization with mitochondria: a new role for an old favorite?. Cell Cycle. 2011, 10: 4170-4171. 10.4161/cc.10.23.18565.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Guerra F, Perrone AM, Kurelac I, Santini D, Ceccarelli C, Cricca M, Zamagni C, De Iaco P, Gasparre G: Mitochondrial DNA mutation in serous ovarian cancer: implications for mitochondria-coded genes in chemoresistance. J Clin Oncol. 2012, 30: e373-378. 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.5933.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Gasparre G, Porcelli AM, Lenaz G, Romeo G: Relevance of mitochondrial genetics and metabolism in cancer development. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013, 5 (2):Google Scholar
  70. Schroedl C, McClintock DS, Budinger GR, Chandel NS: Hypoxic but not anoxic stabilization of HIF-1alpha requires mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002, 283: L922-931.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Calabrese et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement