Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research
  • Open Access

PGC-1α supports glutamine metabolism in breast cancer

  • †1, 2,
  • †1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 3,
  • 4,
  • 4,
  • 1, 5,
  • 2, 6, 7,
  • 1, 3,
  • 1, 2 and
  • 1, 2Email author
†Contributed equally
Cancer & Metabolism20131:22

https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-3002-1-22

©  McGuirk et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

  • Received: 19 July 2013
  • Accepted: 19 November 2013
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Glutamine metabolism is a central metabolic pathway in cancer. Recently, reductive carboxylation of glutamine for lipogenesis has been shown to constitute a key anabolic route in cancer cells. However, little is known regarding central regulators of the various glutamine metabolic pathways in cancer cells.

Methods

The impact of PGC-1α and ERRα on glutamine enzyme expression was assessed in ERBB2+ breast cancer cell lines with quantitative RT-PCR, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and immunoblotting experiments. Glutamine flux was quantified using 13C-labeled glutamine and GC/MS analyses. Functional assays for lipogenesis were performed using 14C-labeled glutamine. The expression of glutamine metabolism genes in breast cancer patients was determined by bioinformatics analyses using The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Results

We show that the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1α, along with the transcription factor ERRα, is a positive regulator of the expression of glutamine metabolism genes in ERBB2+ breast cancer. Indeed, ERBB2+ breast cancer cells with increased expression of PGC-1α display elevated expression of glutamine metabolism genes. Furthermore, ERBB2+ breast cancer cells with reduced expression of PGC-1α or when treated with C29, a pharmacological inhibitor of ERRα, exhibit diminished expression of glutamine metabolism genes. The biological relevance of the control of glutamine metabolism genes by the PGC-1α/ERRα axis is demonstrated by consequent regulation of glutamine flux through the citric acid cycle. PGC-1α and ERRα regulate both the canonical citric acid cycle (forward) and the reductive carboxylation (reverse) fluxes; the latter can be used to support de novo lipogenesis reactions, most notably in hypoxic conditions. Importantly, murine and human ERBB2+ cells lines display a significant dependence on glutamine availability for their growth. Finally, we show that PGC-1α expression is positively correlated with that of the glutamine pathway in ERBB2+ breast cancer patients, and high expression of this pathway is associated with reduced patient survival.

Conclusions

These data reveal that the PGC-1α/ERRα axis is a central regulator of glutamine metabolism in ERBB2+ breast cancer. This novel regulatory link, as well as the marked reduction in patient survival time associated with increased glutamine pathway gene expression, suggests that targeting glutamine metabolism may have therapeutic potential in the treatment of ERBB2+ breast cancer.

Keywords

  • PGC-1α
  • Glutamine
  • Metabolism
  • Breast cancer
  • Metabolomics

Background

Altered metabolism is an emerging hallmark of cancer cells [1]. The most studied metabolic alteration of cancer cells is their high reliance on glycolysis even if there is sufficient oxygen to support mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (Warburg effect). The rapid ATP production of glycolysis is thought to benefit the enhanced proliferation of cancer cells. However, glutamine metabolism has been increasingly recognized as a central metabolic pathway in cancer, and it is thought that the catabolic and anabolic roles of glucose and glutamine cooperate in fuelling tumor growth [2]. The discovery that the oncogene Myc is an important regulator of glutamine metabolism has further strengthened the importance of this metabolic pathway in cancer [3, 4].

Recent studies revealed that reductive carboxylation of glutamine to citrate through reversal of the citric acid cycle (CAC) and the subsequent use of citrate for lipogenesis constitute a key anabolic route in hypoxia in cancer cells, as well as in cancer cells with mitochondrial dysfunctions [5–8]. Hypoxia-induced factor 1 (HIF-1) plays an important role in this metabolic reprogramming, as cells constitutively expressing HIF-1α perform reductive carboxylation of glutamine in normoxia [5, 7]. Clearly, the ability to rely on this metabolic pathway will be a distinct advantage for solid tumors that experience fluctuating levels of oxygen by permitting elevated production of lipids, which are important notably for membrane biogenesis.

The family of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 (PGC-1) consists of three members, PGC-1α, PGC-1β, and PRC. These transcriptional coactivators play a central role in metabolism [9, 10]. Even though the importance of the PGC-1s in regulating mitochondrial functions and metabolism is well established in general, their roles in regulating cancer metabolism and proliferation have only started to emerge recently. The PGC-1s have been shown to have both pro- and anti-tumorigenesis effects [11, 12]. In breast cancer, PGC-1α has been shown to promote the growth of ERBB2+ tumors in vivo and to regulate their mitochondrial metabolism and angiogenic properties [12, 13]. In this paper, we inquired whether PGC-1α participates in the control of glutamine metabolism in breast cancer. We reveal that PGC-1α increases the expression of glutamine metabolism genes, augments glutamine-mediated forward and reverse CAC fluxes, as well as elevates glutamine-mediated lipogenesis in hypoxia. This PGC-1α-mediated increase in glutamine metabolism will confer an advantage to solid breast cancer tumors experiencing limited nutrients and oxygen supply. Relevance to the human disease is underlined by the findings that PGC-1α expression is positively correlated with that of the glutamine pathway in ERBB2+ breast cancer patients, and that high expression of the glutamine pathway is associated with shorter survival time.

Methods

Animals

All procedures were conducted in accordance with approved animal protocols by the McGill University Animal Care Committee. Wild-type mice (C57BL/6J) and muscle creatine kinase (mck)-PGC-1α transgenic mice (C57BL/6-Tg(Ckm-Ppargc1a)31Brsp/J) as described in [14] were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). All animals used were female and were sacrificed at approximately 12 weeks of age.

Tissue culture

Stable cell lines Control-1, PGC-1α-1.1, and PGC-1α-1.2 have been described in [13]. These cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM), 10% FBS, 10 μg/mL insulin, 20 mM HEPES, penicillin/streptomycin, 1 μg/mL puromycin, 400 μg/mL G418, at 37°C and 5% CO2. SK-BR-3 and BT-474 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and penicillin/streptomycin. Hypoxia experiments were performed in a Thermo Scientific (Rockford, IL, USA) Heraeus HERAcell 150 set at 1% O2 and 5% CO2. Pharmacological inhibition of ERRα was performed using Compound 29 (C29) at 5 μM (0.1% DMSO). C29 was synthesized according to [15].

Gene expression

Total RNA from cultured cells, grown to 50% to 60% confluence in 35 mm plates, was extracted using the Aurum Total RNA Mini Kit (Bio-Rad, Mississauga, Canada) and was reverse transcribed with iScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). mRNA expression analyses by real-time PCR were performed using iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) and gene-specific primers with the MyiQ2 Real-Time Detection System (Bio-Rad). Values were normalized to TATA binding protein (Tbp) for murine cell lines or beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) for human cell lines.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

Chromatin was prepared from PGC-1α-1.1 cells, using approximately 107 cells per chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). ChIP was performed as described previously [16] using a specific anti-PGC-1α antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA, catalog #sc-13067) or specific anti-ERRα antibody (Epitomics, Burlingame, CA, USA, catalog #2131-1). Quantification of PGC-1α or ERRα ChIP enrichment was performed using real-time PCR using the LightCycler 480 instrument (Roche, Mississauga, Canada) and specific primers for genomic regions. ChIP enrichment was normalized against the control region and further normalized against the IgG control.

Immunoblotting

Total proteins from cultured cells or muscle tissue were extracted with lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.4, 1% Triton X-100, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) with inhibitors (2 μg/mL pepstatin, 1 μg/mL aprotinin, 1 μg/mL leupeptin, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate) and quantified with the Bio-Rad Protein Assay kit (Catalog #500-0006). The blots were incubated according to the manufacturer's instructions with the following primary antibodies: Glud1 (GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA, GTX88164), Gls (Abcam, Toronto, Canada, AB93434), Got1 (GeneTex, GTX88903), Got2 (GeneTex, GTX88925), Hsp90 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-101494), and Actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-1616) and with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare, Mississauga, Canada, or Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The results were visualized using Western Lightning Plus-ECL (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) or SuperSignal West Femto ECL (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Densitometry analyses were conducted using ImageJ software (NIH).

siRNA

BT-474 cells were subjected to either 10 nM control siRNA (Dharmacon, Rockford, IL, USA, D-001810-10-05) or a combined 10 nM pool of four siRNA specifically targeting PPARGC1A (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA, FlexiTube GeneSolution GS10891). Cells were transfected using calcium phosphate (CaPO4) and incubated for 120 h before extraction.

14C-lipid incorporation assay

Cells were seeded at a density of 400,000 cells per 35 mm plate in standard growth media and conditions. After 24 h, the medium was supplemented with trace amounts of [U-14C]-glutamine (0.094 μCi/mL) and the cells were further incubated either in normoxia (21% O2) or hypoxia (1% O2) for 24 h (Control-1 and PGC-1α-1.1) or 48 h (BT-474). Individual experiments were conducted in triplicate with additional plates for cell counting. Cells were washed with PBS, collected using 0.5% Triton X-100, and stored at −80°C. After thawing, lipids were extracted using chloroform/methanol; the lipid-rich chloroform phase was dried under air and resuspended in 150 μL chloroform. Scintillation counts were measured over 5 minutes per sample using a MicroBeta2 scintillation counter (Perkin-Elmer) and Eco-Lume reagent (MPBio, Solon, OH, USA). Counts were normalized for cell number.

Glutamine uptake

Cellular glutamine uptake was measured using the BioProfile 400 analyzer (Nova Biomedical Corp., Waltham, MA, USA). Following growth under normoxic (21% O2) or hypoxic (1% O2) conditions, media were removed and maintained on ice until analysis. Glutamine uptake was calculated as the difference in glutamine content between culture media and unseeded media incubated in parallel plates and normalized for cell count.

Mass isotopomer distribution analysis

The metabolomics analyses by GC/MS were adapted from [17]. Additional details are provided in Additional file 1.

The Cancer Genome Atlas analyses

Breast cancer data, clinical data, and survival data for 732 patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) [18]. RNAseq data were downloaded from TCGA web portal using the reads per kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads (RPKM) quantification [19]. RPKM data was log2 transformed and expression values lower than 0.25 RPKM were removed. To generate an overall pathway score, all nine genes in the glutamine metabolism pathway were Z-transformed (mean 0 and standard deviation of 1). Mean of zero corrects for the fact that the genes may be expressed at different levels. Transforming the standard deviation to 1 causes the genes to change in the same magnitude, so we can see if the overall pathway is over/underexpressed. If the genes are expressed at different levels, the changes in the pathway will be dominated by the genes that were originally expressed at higher levels. We used the median of Z-scores to generate a pathway score, which was used in correlation and survival analysis.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc., CA, USA), Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, CA, USA) or Matlab (The Mathworks, Inc., MA, USA). Survival analysis was calculated using an implementation of Kaplan-Meir log rank testing from Matlab Exchange [20].

Additional methods

Additional methods are provided in Additional file 1 and in Additional file 2: Table S1.

Results

PGC-1α modulates the expression of enzymes involved in glutamine metabolism in ERBB2/Neu-induced breast cancer cells

To assess the impact of PGC-1α on the expression of glutamine metabolism genes, we used clones of ERBB2/Neu-induced breast cancer cells with modestly increased expression of PGC-1α (α-1.1 and α-1.2) and control cells (Ctl-1) [13]. These cells have been extensively characterized [13], and as expected, they display an approximately 30% increase in expression of well-known PGC-1α mitochondrial target genes [13] [see Additional file 3: Figure S1A]. Here we reveal that the mRNA expression of enzymes involved in glutamine catabolism, transport, and synthesis were significantly increased in PGC-1α clones compared with control (Figure 1A,B). In support of this point, cells with reduced expression of PGC-1α displayed lowered expression of glutamine metabolism genes [see Additional file 3: Figure S1B]. In addition, PGC-1α controls these genes in a cancer-independent context, as PGC-1α muscle-specific transgenic animals exhibited increased expression of several glutamine metabolism genes [see Additional file 3: Figure S1C,D]. Given the known functional relationship between PGC-1α and the estrogen-related receptor α (ERRα) in the control of metabolism genes [10], we tested whether PGC-1α could be recruited at promoter sites targeted by ERRα using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments. ERBB2/Neu-induced breast cancer cells with increased expression of PGC-1α (α-1.1) displayed two-fold enrichment or greater for PGC-1α and ERRα at the promoter of glutamine metabolism genes (Figure 1C), supporting the tight association between the ERRs and PGC-1 s in the control of metabolic genes [10, 12]. Finally, we confirmed that the PGC-1α-mediated increase in expression of glutamine metabolism genes resulted in approximately two-fold or greater increase in protein levels (Figure 1D,E). This coordinated augmentation in mRNA and protein expression, in addition to corresponding enrichments observed in ChIP analyses, demonstrates that PGC-1α and ERRα exert a concerted control of glutamine metabolism genes; such pathway control has been shown to have strong biological relevance [21].
Figure 1
Figure 1

PGC-1α modulates the expression of glutamine metabolism enzymes. (A) Schematic representation of glutamine metabolism in cells. SLC1A5, solute carrier family 1, member 5; GLS1, kidney-type glutaminase; GLS2, liver-type glutaminase; GLUD1, glutamate dehydrogenase 1; GOT2, mitochondrial glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase; GPT2, mitochondrial glutamic pyruvate transaminase; GOT1, cytoplasmic glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase; GPT1, cytoplasmic glutamic pyruvate transaminase; GLUL, glutamate-ammonia ligase; Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamate; OAA, oxaloacetate; Asp, aspartate; Pyr, pyruvate; Ala, alanine; α-KG, α-ketoglutarate; CAC, citric acid cycle. (B) Expression of glutamine metabolism genes in ERBB2/Neu-induced breast cancer cells (NT2196) with increased expression of PGC-1α (α-1.1, α-1.2) normalized to that in control cells. Data are presented as means ± S.E.M., n = 4. *P <0.05, paired Student's t-test. (C) ChIP analyses for PGC-1α and ERRα at ERRE sites on the promoter of glutamine metabolism genes in NT2196 cells with increased expression of PGC-1α (α-1.1). Data represent the fold enrichment for two independent experiments. (D) Representative western blot for select glutamine metabolism enzymes in NT2196 cells with increased expression of PGC-1α (α-1.1, α-1.2) and control (Ctl-1). (E) Quantification of five independent western blot experiments, normalized to ACTIN levels. Data are presented as means ± S.E.M., n = 5. *P <0.05, paired Student's t-test.

PGC-1α/ERRα modulate forward and reverse glutamine flux through the citric acid cycle

To demonstrate the biological significance of the changes in glutamine gene expression, we first quantified relative glutamine uptake in ERBB2/Neu-induced breast cancer cells with increased expression of PGC-1α (α-1.1) and control cells. The α-1.1 cells showed a 25% increase in glutamine uptake both in normoxia and hypoxia compared with control (Figure 2A). This increase is similar in magnitude to that elicited by oncogenic levels of Myc [3].
Figure 2
Figure 2

PGC-1α modulates glutamine metabolism in normoxia and hypoxia. (A) Glutamine uptake in NT2196 cells with increased expression of PGC-1α (α-1.1) and control. Cells were cultured in either normoxia or hypoxia for 24 h. Data are represented as fold difference for α-1.1 cells compared to control. Data are presented as means ± S.E.M., n = 5. *P <0.05, paired Student's t-test. (B) Schematic representation depicting metabolomics experiments using [U-13C]-glutamine to evaluate forward (green) and reverse (red) citric acid cycle (CAC) fluxes. Herein, 13C is represented as black circles and endogenous 12C as white circles. (C) Mass isotopomer enrichment of α-ketoglutarate in NT2196 cells with increased expression of PGC-1α (α-1.1) and control (Ctl-1) pulsed with [U-13C]-glutamine in normoxia and hypoxia. Data are presented as means ± S.E.M., n = 6. †P <0.05, paired Student's t-test. (D) Mass isotopomer enrichment of citrate. Data are presented as means ± S.E.M., n = 6. *(m + 4, forward flux) and †(m + 5, reverse flux) P <0.05, paired Student's t-test. (E) Mass isotopomer enrichment of malate. Data are presented as means ± S.E.M., n = 6. *(m + 4, forward flux) and †(m + 3, reverse flux) P <0.05, paired Student's t-test. (F) Mass isotopomer enrichment of fumarate. Data are presented as means ± S.E.M., n = 6. *(m + 4, forward flux) and †(m + 3, reverse flux) P <0.05, paired Student's t-test. For panels C-F, normalized ion amounts were calculated as normalized MDV* multiplied by fold change in steady state levels, relative to Ctl-1 cells in normoxia.

To gain insight on the flux of glutamine upon increased PGC-1α expression, α-1.1 and control cells were incubated with [U-13C]-glutamine labelled at all five carbons (Figure 2B). α-ketoglutarate m + 5 is generated from glutamine m + 5 ([U-13C]-glutamine) and serves as an entry point in the CAC, where it can either generate isocitrate m + 5 by reductive carboxylation (reverse flux) or succinate m + 4 by oxidative decarboxylation (forward flux) (Figure 2B). Reverse CAC flux leads to enrichments in citrate m + 5, malate m + 3, and fumarate m + 3, and forward CAC leads to the enrichment of m + 4 metabolites (Figure 2B). Citrate m + 4 and m + 5 can be used for lipid biosynthesis, but citrate generated specifically through reverse CAC (m + 5) plays a central role in glutamine-derived lipogenesis in cancer cells (Figure 2B) [5–7].

We performed glutamine labeling experiments in normoxia and hypoxia given that reductive carboxylation of glutamine is particularly active in hypoxia [5–7]. In normoxia, α-1.1 cells displayed increased entry of glutamine in the CAC as illustrated by elevated amount of m + 5 α-ketoglutarate compared with control (Figure 2C). The α-ketoglutarate can then enter both the forward and reverse CAC reactions. The α-1.1 cells displayed higher forward and reverse CAC activity compared with controls (Figure 2C-F). The elevated forward flux can be seen from the higher amount of m + 4 citrate, malate, and fumarate, while the elevated reverse flux can be observed in the higher amount of m + 5 citrate as well as m + 3 malate and fumarate (Figure 2D-F) [see Additional file 4: Figure S2A]. The reverse flux represented a small fraction of the total CAC flux in normoxia. In hypoxia, there was an increase in the entry of glutamine in the CAC at α-ketoglutarate both for the control and α-1.1 cells compared with normoxia (Figure 2C). In general, hypoxia caused an increase in the reverse flux for both the control and α-1.1 cells (Figure 2D-F) [see Additional file 4: Figure S2A], but the effects were more pronounced in the α-1.1 cells and can be best appreciated when examining the labeling on citrate (Figure 2D). Indeed, α-1.1 cells displayed a large m + 5 labeling on citrate in hypoxia and devoted a larger fraction of their CAC flux for reverse reactions than control cells in hypoxia (Figure 2D). Together, these metabolomics experiments illustrate that PGC-1α can stimulate glutamine-mediated forward and reverse CAC fluxes in normoxia and hypoxia.

Next, we investigated whether ERRα could also regulate glutamine flux through the CAC given that it can be recruited with PGC-1α to the promoter of glutamine metabolism genes. To do so, we used the ERRα pharmacological inhibitor C29 [15] in the ERBB2+ human breast cancer cell lines SK-BR-3 and BT-474. Treatment of SK-BR-3 cells with C29 both in normoxia and hypoxia decreased the expression of glutamine metabolism and CAC genes (Figure 3A). This is supported by a concomitant decrease in glutamine metabolism protein levels [see Additional file 5: Figure S3]. In agreement with these changes, SK-BR-3 cells treated with C29 displayed a decrease in forward CAC flux, most notably in hypoxia, illustrated by reduced fraction of m + 4 citrate, malate, and fumarate (Figure 3C). The reverse CAC flux was significantly decreased in the presence of C29 in normoxia and hypoxia, demonstrated by a reduced fraction of m + 5 α-ketoglutarate and citrate as well as m + 3 malate and fumarate (Figure 3C). In BT-474 cells, C29 decreased the expression of glutamine metabolism and CAC genes and also reduced forward and reverse CAC fluxes in hypoxia (Figure 3B,C). The lack of effect of C29 in BT-474 cells in normoxia is most likely explained by the fact that these cells are not as dependent on ERRα activity as SK-BR-3 cells under standard conditions [22]. Together, the metabolite flux experiments performed with PGC-1α and ERRα illustrate that they both play a central role in controlling glutamine-mediated forward and reverse CAC fluxes in ERBB2+ breast cancer cells. It is important to note that we did not detect glutamine-derived lactate in all ERBB2+ cells we tested [see Additional file 4: Figure S2B-D].
Figure 3
Figure 3

ERRα modulates glutamine metabolism in normoxia and hypoxia. (A) Expression of glutamine metabolism genes in SK-BR-3 cells treated with ERRα inhibitor C29 and cultured in either normoxia or hypoxia for 24 h. Expression is normalized to normoxic control cells. Data are represented as means ± S.E.M., from three biological replicates representative of two independent experiments. *P <0.05, unpaired Student's t-test. (B) Expression of glutamine metabolism genes in BT-474 cells treated with C29 and cultured in either normoxia or hypoxia for 24 h. Expression is normalized to normoxic control cells. Data are represented as means ± S.E.M., from four independent cultures. *P <0.05, paired Student's t-test. (C) Mass isotopomer distribution analysis of CAC intermediates in SK-BR-3 and BT-474 cells treated as in A and B, respectively, and pulsed with [U-13C]-glutamine. For SK-BR-3, data are represented as means ± S.E.M., from three biological replicates representative of two independent experiments. *P <0.05, unpaired Student's t-test. For BT-474, data are represented as means ± S.E.M., from four independent cultures. *P <0.05, paired Student's t-test. For panel C, relative ion levels represent specific mass isotopomer fractions normalized to that of control cells in normoxia.

PGC-1α increases glutamine-mediated fatty acid biosynthesis and favors proliferation in limited nutrient conditions

One central function of glutamine metabolism is to replenish the CAC of intermediates that are used for biosynthetic processes, notably citrate that is used in lipid synthesis [2]. Indeed, glutamine has been shown to play a central role in lipid biosynthesis in cancer cells [23, 24]. We measured the impact of PGC-1α on the expression of key genes involved in lipid biosynthesis. ERBB2/Neu-induced breast cancer cells with increased expression of PGC-1α (α-1.1 and α-1.2) displayed an elevated expression of lipogenic genes compared with control cells (Ctl-1; Figure 4A,B). In order to determine the involvement of PGC-1α in glutamine-mediated lipid biosynthesis, we incubated α-1.1 cells and control with trace amounts of [U-14C]-glutamine and monitored 14C incorporation in whole lipid extracts. The α-1.1 cells displayed a significant (48%) increase in 14C incorporation compared with controls in normoxia, as well as a robust (63%) increase in 14C incorporation compared with controls in hypoxia (Figure 4C). As expected, there was an important increase in glutamine-mediated lipid biosynthesis in hypoxia in both control and α-1.1 cells (Figure 4C) [7]. Also, ERRα is an important regulator of glutamine-mediated lipogenesis as BT-474 cells treated with C29 elicited a significant (62%) decrease in [U-14C]-glutamine incorporation into lipids in hypoxia [see Additional file 6: Figure S4A]. These data illustrate that PGC-1α and ERRα are key regulators of glutamine-mediated lipid biosynthesis.
Figure 4
Figure 4

PGC-1α promotes glutamine-mediated lipid biosynthesis and favors proliferation in limited nutrient conditions. (A) Schematic representation depicting lipogenesis from glutamine through reverse citric acid cycle (CAC) activity. Glutamine-derived α-ketoglutarate is converted to isocitrate by mitochondrial NADP+/NADPH-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH2), producing citrate. Citrate is exported to the cytoplasm to generate acetyl CoA and oxaloacetate via ATP citrate lyase (ACLY). Acetyl CoA is converted to malonyl CoA by acetyl CoA carboxylase (ACC). Iterative additions of acetyl CoA to malonyl CoA by fatty acid synthase (FAS) yield fatty acid products (shown: palmitate). Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamate; OAA, oxaloacetate; GLS1, kidney-type glutaminase; GLS2, liver-type glutaminase; GLUD1, glutamate dehydrogenase 1; GOT2, mitochondrial glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase; GPT2, mitochondrial glutamic pyruvate transaminase. (B) Expression of lipogenic genes in ERBB2/Neu-induced breast cancer cells (NT2196) with increased expression of PGC-1α (α-1.1, α-1.2) normalized to that in control cells. Data are presented as means ± S.E.M., n = 3. *P <0.05, paired Student's t-test. (C) Incorporation of 14C into lipids from trace [U-14C]-glutamine in α-1.1 and Ctl-1 cells under normoxia or hypoxia. Counts were normalized for cell number and expressed relative to that of control cells in normoxia. Data are presented as means ± S.E.M., n = 6. *P <0.05, paired Student's t-test. (D) Relative proliferation of α-1.1 and Ctl-1 cells in the absence of glutamine compared to proliferation in standard glutamine conditions. Data are presented as fold values of cell count in standard glutamine conditions at 5 days ± S.E.M., n = 6. *P <0.05, paired Student's t-test. (E) Relative proliferation of α-1.1 and Ctl-1 cells in hypoxia under low glucose conditions compared to proliferation in normoxia and standard glucose conditions. Data are presented as fold values of cell count in normoxia and standard glucose conditions at 6 days ± S.E.M., n = 4. *P <0.05, paired Student's t-test.

Next, we tested the impact of PGC-1α on the sensitivity of ERBB2/Neu-induced breast cancer cells to glutamine deprivation, low glucose, and hypoxia, in order to mimic the environment of solid growing tumors. The growth of both ERBB2/Neu-induced breast cancer cells with increased expression of PGC-1α (α-1.1) and controls was ablated in the absence of glutamine (Figure 4D), illustrating that ERBB2/Neu-induced breast cancer cells require glutamine for their growth. A similar dependency on glutamine was observed with human ERBB2+ breast cancer cell lines [see Additional file 6: Figure S4B,C]. We then tested the impact of PGC-1α on cellular proliferation in low glucose and hypoxia, two conditions that can favor glutamine usage (Figure 4E) [5, 7, 25]. The proliferation of α-1.1 cells was less sensitive to a combination of low glucose and hypoxia than controls as indicated by their smaller reduction in proliferation (Figure 4E). Together, these data demonstrate that glutamine is a key metabolite for the growth of ERBB2/Neu-induced breast cancer cells, and that the PGC-1α-mediated increase in glutamine metabolism is associated with protection against low glucose conditions and hypoxia, two conditions that can favor glutamine metabolism.

Gene expression analyses of PGC-1α and glutamine enzymes in breast cancer patients

We examined the expression of PGC-1α (PPARGC1A) and glutamine enzymes in 732 breast cancer patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to determine their expression pattern across breast cancer subtypes and correlation with survival. PPARGC1A expression was highest in basal and ERBB2-enriched breast cancer subtypes, which have poorer prognosis than luminal A and B subtypes (Figure 5A). The expression of glutamine enzymes (glutamine cluster) was positively correlated with PPARGC1A expression in the basal and ERBB2-enriched breast cancer subtypes, in agreement with the fact that these subtypes have the highest expression of PPARGC1A (Figure 5B). Then, we determined if the expression of the glutamine cluster was correlated with clinical outcome. High expression of the glutamine cluster was associated with reduced survival in ERBB2-enriched and luminal B subtypes, and this association held true when looking at all breast cancer patients (Figure 5B,C). The fact that high expression of the glutamine cluster is associated with reduced survival in luminal B subtype but is not positively correlated with PPARGC1A expression suggests that, while glutamine metabolism is clinically relevant in this subtype, factors other than PGC-1α are driving the expression of this pathway. Overall, these data provide clinical relevance to the notion that PGC-1α is a central regulator of glutamine metabolism in ERBB2+ breast cancer cells.
Figure 5
Figure 5

Expression analyses of PGC-1α and glutamine pathway in breast cancer patients. (A) Expression of PGC-1α across the different breast cancer clinical subtypes in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data set, where crosses represent outliers for this subtype. Expression is given in log2-normalized reads per kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads (RPKM). The number of samples for Basal-like, ERBB2-enriched, Luminal A, Luminal B, and Normal-like is 87, 53, 201, 110, and 7, respectively. PGC-1α expression is higher in basal than luminal A and B subtypes, higher in luminal A subtype than luminal B subtype, and higher in ERBB2-enriched than luminal B subtype. P <1E-13 for Kruskal-Wallis, *P <0.05 using a posteriori Tukey-Kramer test. (B) (top) Expression of the glutamine metabolism genes is correlated with that of PGC-1α. The table shows the Pearson correlation coefficients between PGC-1α expression and the pathway score of the glutamine cluster. Colors represent the intensity of correlation as per the gradient shown. (bottom) Patient survival is related to glutamine cluster expression. The table shows P values for survival. Higher expression of glutamine cluster correlated with reduced survival in ERBB2-enriched and luminal B subtypes as well as in combined subtypes. Green arrows represent significant differences. P <0.05, logrank test. (C) High expression of glutamine metabolism genes is associated with reduced survival in all patients (all subtypes, left) and ERBB2-enriched patients (right). Kaplan-Meier survival curves represent the differences in survival between patients with high and low expression of the glutamine cluster.

Discussion

In this manuscript, we report that the PGC-1α/ERRα axis is a key regulator of glutamine metabolism in ERBB2+ breast cancer cells. We revealed that PGC-1α/ERRα bind the promoter of glutamine metabolism genes and regulate their expression, which ultimately controls the flux of glutamine in cells. This can contribute to increased lipid biosynthesis, especially under hypoxic conditions. Finally, we demonstrate that the PGC-1α-mediated control of glutamine metabolism has clinical relevance in ERBB2+ breast cancer patients.

Even though the importance of glutamine metabolism in cancer cells is well appreciated, much less is known regarding central regulators of glutamine metabolic pathways. Major transcriptional regulators of glutamine metabolism identified so far are c-Myc [3, 4, 26, 27] and HIF-1 [5, 7]. In this study, we reveal that PGC-1α/ERRα are central regulators of glutamine-mediated forward and reverse CAC fluxes. Interestingly, a recent report showed that glutamine reductive carboxylation for lipogenesis is particularly active in brown fat cells [28], the same cell type where PGC-1α was discovered and which display very high expression of this coactivator [29]. In recent years, PGC-1s/ERRs have been involved in the control of the expression of numerous metabolic pathways in breast cancer cells [12, 22, 30]. Both PGC-1α and ERRα have been shown to promote the growth of ERBB2+ tumors in vivo and to regulate the metabolism of this specific breast cancer subtype [12, 13, 22, 31]. Interestingly, increased expression of PGC-1α reduced the proliferation of ERBB2+ cells in vitro, but promoted tumor growth in vivo by promoting nutrient supply [13]. We show here that ERBB2+ cells are dependent on glutamine for their growth as complete glutamine removal from cell culture severely compromised cell growth. Although the glucose dependence of ERBB2+ cells is well known [32], the role of glutamine in this system has been largely overlooked. A point supporting the importance of glutamine in ERBB2+ tumors is the observation that ERBB2 signaling elevates c-Myc expression, which is a central regulator of glutamine metabolism [22]. Furthermore, it would not be surprising that the pro-growth effect of PGC-1α and ERRα in ERBB2+ tumors is mediated at least in part through their positive impact on glutamine metabolism. In support of this point, the expression of PGC-1α and that of the glutamine pathway are positively correlated in ERBB2+ breast cancer patients, and high expression of glutamine metabolism enzymes is associated with shorter survival. It is important to emphasize that we do not exclude the possibility that PGC-1α may associate with other transcription factors, in addition to ERRα, to control the expression of glutamine metabolism genes.

Conclusions

In this paper, we reveal that the PGC-1α/ERRα axis is a central regulator of glutamine metabolism in ERBB2+ breast cancer. PGC-1α/ERRα likely regulate similar metabolic programs in diverse cancer types as the metabolic targets of PGC-1α/ERRα in various normal tissues and cancer cells/tumors are similar. The positive or negative impact of PGC-1α/ERRα on tumor growth will depend on the specific metabolic alterations of each tumor. There is significant effort currently underway to associate metabolic signatures to specific oncogenes. Furthermore, it is important to appreciate that the PGC-1α/ERRα axis also regulates the expression of genes not directly associated with metabolism; these genes may be equally or even more important in defining the roles of PGC-1α/ERRα in various cancer types. For example, ERRα regulates the expression of genes located in the ERBB2 amplicon that are involved in signal transduction, cell migration and invasion, as well as tamoxifen resistance [31]. Overall, much remains to be discovered regarding the importance of PGC-1α/ERRα in contributing to the altered metabolism of various cancer types and to link this new metabolic state with clinical outcome. Also, the importance of PGC-1α/ERRα target genes involved in other hallmarks of cancer cells such as migration/invasion, apoptosis, and angiogenesis [1] needs to be established. That being said, the identification of PGC-1α/ERRα as central regulators of glutamine metabolism may open novel therapeutic avenues for tumors showing strong dependence on this metabolic pathway.

Authors’ information

Co-first authors: Shawn McGuirk and Simon-Pierre Gravel.

Notes

Abbreviations

CAC: 

Citric acid cycle

ChIP: 

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

RPKM: 

Reads per kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads

TCGA: 

The Cancer Genome Atlas.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge salary support from Canderel (to S-P.G.), Michael D'Avirro Fellowship in Molecular Oncology (to S.M.), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (to B.F. and R.G.J.), Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ) (to J.St-P.), McGill Integrated Cancer Research Training Program (MICRTP) (to D.J.P., FRN53888), and US department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program (to G.D., W81XWH-10-1-0489). This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research [grant number MOP-106603 to J.St-P.; MOP-93799 to R.G.J.; MOP-64275 to V.G.] and Terry Fox Foundation [grant number TFF-116128 to J.St-P., R.G.J., V.G., and Metabolomics Core Facility]. We also thank Erzsebet Nagy Kovacs for technical assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Goodman Cancer Research Centre, McGill University, 1160 Pine Ave. West, Montréal, PQ, H3A 1A3, Canada
(2)
Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, 3655 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, Montréal, PQ, H3G 1Y6, Canada
(3)
Department of Physiology, McGill University, 3655 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, Montréal, PQ, H3G 1Y6, Canada
(4)
Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, 7 Avenue des Hauts-Fourneaux, Esch-Belval, L-4362, Luxembourg
(5)
Metabolomics Core Facility, McGill University, 1160 Pine Ave. West, Montréal, PQ, H3A 1A3, Canada
(6)
Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, 1212 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY 10027, USA
(7)
Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Columbia University Medical Center, 1130 St. Nicholas Ave, New York, NY 10032, USA

References

  1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA: Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011, 144: 646-674. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. DeBerardinis RJ, Cheng T: Q's next: the diverse functions of glutamine in metabolism, cell biology and cancer. Oncogene. 2010, 29: 313-324. 10.1038/onc.2009.358.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wise DR, DeBerardinis RJ, Mancuso A, Sayed N, Zhang XY, Pfeiffer HK, Nissim I, Daikhin E, Yudkoff M, McMahon SB, Thompson CB: Myc regulates a transcriptional program that stimulates mitochondrial glutaminolysis and leads to glutamine addiction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 18782-18787. 10.1073/pnas.0810199105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gao P, Tchernyshyov I, Chang TC, Lee YS, Kita K, Ochi T, Zeller KI, De Marzo AM, Van Eyk JE, Mendell JT: Dang CV: c-Myc suppression of miR-23a/b enhances mitochondrial glutaminase expression and glutamine metabolism. Nature. 2009, 458: 762-765. 10.1038/nature07823.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wise DR, Ward PS, Shay JE, Cross JR, Gruber JJ, Sachdeva UM, Platt JM, DeMatteo RG, Simon MC, Thompson CB: Hypoxia promotes isocitrate dehydrogenase-dependent carboxylation of alpha-ketoglutarate to citrate to support cell growth and viability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011, 108: 19611-19616. 10.1073/pnas.1117773108.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mullen AR, Wheaton WW, Jin ES, Chen PH, Sullivan LB, Cheng T, Yang Y, Linehan WM, Chandel NS, DeBerardinis RJ: Reductive carboxylation supports growth in tumour cells with defective mitochondria. Nature. 2012, 481: 385-388.Google Scholar
  7. Metallo CM, Gameiro PA, Bell EL, Mattaini KR, Yang J, Hiller K, Jewell CM, Johnson ZR, Irvine DJ, Guarente L, Kelleher JK, Vander Heiden MG, Iliopoulos O, Stephanopoulos G: Reductive glutamine metabolism by IDH1 mediates lipogenesis under hypoxia. Nature. 2012, 481: 380-384.Google Scholar
  8. Filipp FV, Ratnikov B, De Ingeniis J, Smith JW, Osterman AL, Scott DA: Glutamine-fueled mitochondrial metabolism is decoupled from glycolysis in melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2012, 25: 732-739. 10.1111/pcmr.12000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Handschin C, Spiegelman BM: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 coactivators, energy homeostasis, and metabolism. Endocr Rev. 2006, 27: 728-735.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Giguere V: Transcriptional control of energy homeostasis by the estrogen-related receptors. Endocr Rev. 2008, 29: 677-696. 10.1210/er.2008-0017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Girnun GD: The diverse role of the PPARgamma coactivator 1 family of transcriptional coactivators in cancer. Seminars Cell Dev Biol. 2012, 23: 381-388. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.01.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Deblois G, St-Pierre J, Giguere V: The PGC-1/ERR signaling axis in cancer. Oncogene. 2013, 32: 3483-3490. 10.1038/onc.2012.529.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Klimcakova E, Chenard V, McGuirk S, Germain D, Avizonis D, Muller WJ, St-Pierre J: PGC-1alpha promotes the growth of ErbB2/Neu-induced mammary tumors by regulating nutrient supply. Cancer Res. 2012, 72: 1538-1546. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2967.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin J, Wu H, Tarr PT, Zhang CY, Wu Z, Boss O, Michael LF, Puigserver P, Isotani E, Olson EN, Lowell BB, Bassel-Duby R, Spiegelman BM: Transcriptional co-activator PGC-1 alpha drives the formation of slow-twitch muscle fibres. Nature. 2002, 418: 797-801. 10.1038/nature00904.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Patch RJ, Searle LL, Kim AJ, De D, Zhu X, Askari HB, O'Neill JC, Abad MC, Rentzeperis D, Liu J, Kemmerer M, Lin L, Kasturi J, Geisler JG, Lenhard JM, Player MR, Gaul MD: Identification of diaryl ether-based ligands for estrogen-related receptor alpha as potential antidiabetic agents. J Med Chem. 2011, 54: 788-808. 10.1021/jm101063h.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Laganiere J, Tremblay GB, Dufour CR, Giroux S, Rousseau F, Giguere V: A polymorphic autoregulatory hormone response element in the human estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRalpha) promoter dictates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1alpha control of ERRalpha expression. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 18504-18510. 10.1074/jbc.M313543200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Faubert B, Boily G, Izreig S, Griss T, Samborska B, Dong Z, Dupuy F, Chambers C, Fuerth BJ, Viollet B, Mamer OA, Avizonis D, DeBerardinis RJ, Siegel PM, Jones RG: AMPK is a negative regulator of the warburg effect and suppresses tumor growth in vivo. Cell Metab. 2013, 17: 113-124. 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cancer Genome Atlas Network: Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012, 490: 61-70. 10.1038/nature11412.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B: Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods. 2008, 5: 621-628. 10.1038/nmeth.1226.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cardillo G: LogRank: Comparing survival curves of two groups using the log rank test. [http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/22317-logrank]
  21. Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, Lehar J, Puigserver P, Carlsson E, Ridderstrale M, Laurila E, Houstis N, Daly MJ, Patterson N, Mesirov JP, Golub TR, Tamayo P, Spiegelman B, Lander ES, Hirschhorn JN, Altshuler D, Groop LC: PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 2003, 34: 267-273. 10.1038/ng1180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chang CY, Kazmin D, Jasper JS, Kunder R, Zuercher WJ, McDonnell DP: The metabolic regulator ERRalpha, a downstream target of HER2/IGF-1R, as a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2011, 20: 500-510. 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.08.023.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Deberardinis RJ, Sayed N, Ditsworth D, Thompson CB: Brick by brick: metabolism and tumor cell growth. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2008, 18: 54-61. 10.1016/j.gde.2008.02.003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Anastasiou D, Cantley LC: Breathless cancer cells get fat on glutamine. Cell Res. 2012, 22: 443-446. 10.1038/cr.2012.5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang C, Sudderth J, Dang T, Bachoo RM, McDonald JG, DeBerardinis RJ: Glioblastoma cells require glutamate dehydrogenase to survive impairments of glucose metabolism or Akt signaling. Cancer Res. 2009, 69: 7986-7993. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2266.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yuneva M, Zamboni N, Oefner P, Sachidanandam R, Lazebnik Y: Deficiency in glutamine but not glucose induces MYC-dependent apoptosis in human cells. J Cell Biol. 2007, 178: 93-105. 10.1083/jcb.200703099.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dang CV: MYC on the path to cancer. Cell. 2012, 149: 22-35. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Yoo H, Antoniewicz MR, Stephanopoulos G, Kelleher JK: Quantifying reductive carboxylation flux of glutamine to lipid in a brown adipocyte cell line. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 20621-20627. 10.1074/jbc.M706494200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Puigserver P, Wu Z, Park CW, Graves R, Wright M, Spiegelman BM: A cold-inducible coactivator of nuclear receptors linked to adaptive thermogenesis. Cell. 1998, 92: 829-839. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81410-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Deblois G, Giguere V: Oestrogen-related receptors in breast cancer: control of cellular metabolism and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013, 13: 27-36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Deblois G, Chahrour G, Perry MC, Sylvain-Drolet G, Muller WJ, Giguere V: Transcriptional control of the ERBB2 amplicon by ERRalpha and PGC-1beta promotes mammary gland tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2010, 70: 10277-10287. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2840.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Fantin VR, St-Pierre J, Leder P: Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance. Cancer Cell. 2006, 9: 425-434. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.04.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© McGuirk et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

Cancer & Metabolism

ISSN: 2049-3002