Skip to main content

Can inhibiting insulin/IGF signaling with dietary carbohydrate restriction play a role in treatment/prevention of cancers?

Background

Hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, and obesity have been identified as risk factors for a variety of cancers [1]. Insulin inhibition (INSINH) can potentially limit cancer growth by factors including ketosis [2], and apoptosis secondary to fatty acid synthase inhibition [3] as well as intracellular potassium depletion [4]. Furthermore, dysregulation of many signaling proteins downstream of the insulin/IGF receptors such as PI3K/Akt, mTOR (inhibition) and AMPK (amplification) is a major area of drug target development [5, 6]. We performed a four week INSINH diet in patients with advanced cancers to study safety/feasibility and also to examine a change in18F-2-fluoro, 2-deoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on PET scan as a surrogate measure for tumor response.

Methods

Eligible patients had failed or refused ≥2 standard chemotherapy courses. Exclusions included concurrent chemotherapy, end-organ disease, hypoglycemic medications, difficult compliance, or BMI < 20. A supervised INSINH diet restricted starches and sugars for 28 days, and was monitored weekly for macronutrient intake, body weight, [glucose] [BHB], [insulin], [IGF1,2]. An exit four-week PET was obtained for comparison with the baseline scan.

Results

Ten subjects with diverse cancers completed ≥ 26 days of INSINH without associated unsafe adverse effects. Mean caloric intake decreased (35 ± 6) % vs. predicted requirements despite our best efforts to encourage increased food consumption. Weight loss (median 4%, range 0.0-6.1%) was not judged a health risk in any subject. Mild, reversible side effects included constipation (n=2), transient fatigue (n=5), and leg cramps (n=2). Among nine patients with pre-trial progressive disease (PD) five demonstrated post-trial stable disease or partial remission (SD/ PR) on PET. SD/PR correlated with three-fold higher ketosis compared to those with continued PD (n=4), (p<0.02), but was uncorrelated with reduced calorie intake (p=0.45) or weight loss (p=0.81). Insulin correlated inversely with ketosis (r=0.62, p=0.026), but did not correlate with IFG(1 or 2).

Conclusions

Preliminary pilot data in ten subjects demonstrated that an INSINH diet is safe and feasible in selected patients with advanced cancer. The extent of ketosis, but neither calorie deficit nor weight loss correlated with SD/PR. The small sample size requires further study. Further exploration is also required to evaluate an insulin inhibiting diet’s: 1. mechanism in relation to calorie restriction; 2. role as an adjunct to metabolic or cytotoxic therapies; 3. long-term value to reduce overall cancer risk.

References

  1. Lann D, LeRoith D: The role of endocrine insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin in breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2008, 13: 371-379. 10.1007/s10911-008-9100-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fine EJ, Miller A, Quadros EV, Sequeira JM, Feinman RD: Acetoacetate reduces growth and ATP concentration in cancer cell lines which over-express uncoupling protein 2. Cancer Cell International. 2009, 9: 14-10.1186/1475-2867-9-14.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou W, Simpson PJ, McFadden JM, et al: Fatty acid synthase inhibition triggers apoptosis during S phase in human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 7330-7337.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bortner CD, Sifre MI, Cidlowski JA: Cationic gradient reversal and cytoskeleton-independent volume regulatory pathways define an early stage of apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 7219-7229. 10.1074/jbc.M707809200.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yao JC, Lombard-Bohas C, Baudin E, Kvols LK, Rougier P, Ruszniewski P, et al: Daily oral everolimus activity in patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after failure of cytotoxic chemotherapy: a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28: 69-76. 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2669.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Luo Z, Zang M, Guo W: AMPK as a metabolic tumor suppressor: control of metabolism and cell growth. Future Oncol. 2010, 6: 457-470. 10.2217/fon.09.174.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the State University of New York Research Foundation and the Robert and Veronica Atkins Foundation. This publication also was supported in part by CTSA grants UL1RR025750, KL2RR025749 (gs4), and TL1RR025748 from the National Center for Research Resources, a component of the National Institutes of Health, and the National Institutesof Health Roadmap for Medical Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fine, E.J., Segal-Isaacson, C., Herzkopf, S. et al. Can inhibiting insulin/IGF signaling with dietary carbohydrate restriction play a role in treatment/prevention of cancers?. Cancer Metab 2 (Suppl 1), O31 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-3002-2-S1-O31

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-3002-2-S1-O31

Keywords